Case Studies
Apr 3, 2014

Assessing Effects of Small Dams on Stream Flow and Water Quality in an Agricultural Watershed

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 10

Abstract

Small dams and associated reservoirs have notable effects on soil and water dynamics in prairie streams. In this study, we developed a simulation module of small dams in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to evaluate their long-term effects on stream flow and water quality at a watershed scale. To overcome the challenges in characterizing small storage and short retention time in small reservoir routing, concepts of equivalent reservoir storage and equivalent reservoir discharge are applied by which the average daily storage and daily discharge of the small reservoirs are calculated. Accordingly, the sediment deposition and nutrient abatement within the reservoir are computed using available SWAT routines. The effects of small dams in reduction of daily peak flow, sediment, and nutrient loads at the watershed outlet are obtained by summing the effects of all small dams within the watershed considering both reservoir and channel processes. The model is applied to the 74.6-km2 South Tobacco Creek watershed located in Southern Manitoba of Canada. A total of 26 small dams exist in the watershed with surface area ranging from 0.002 to 0.492km2 and storage capacity from 3,380 to 642,000m3. The simulation results show that the combined effect of these small dams can reduce daily peak flow by 0–14% at the watershed outlet depending on climate and initial reservoir storage conditions. The estimated average annual sediment, total nitrogen and total phosphorus reductions at the watershed outlet are about 4.51, 3.59, and 2.96%, respectively. However, the on-site effects of individual small dams are much higher depending on its size, location, shape, drainage area, and land use compositions in the contribution area. The simulation results also show that snowmelt-flooding events have higher reduction amounts but lower relative reduction rates compared to rainfall storm events and the back-flood small dams have greater impact on sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorous abatement followed by multipurpose small dams and dry dams in the study watershed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by the Canadian AAFC WEBs project and SSHRC. The authors would like to thank David Kiely, Brook Harker, Terrie Hoppe, Valerie Stuart, Lucy Clearwater, and Irene Hanuta of AAFC for administrative support; and Dr. Mohammad Khakbazan and Cliff Hamilton of AAFC for providing land management data. The authors would like to thank Drs. David Lobb and Don Flaten of University of Manitoba for their insights on our modeling efforts. The authors would also like to thank Bill Turner, Don Cruikshank, and Kelvin Hildebrandt of Deerwood Soil and Water Management Association for their excellent support on field work and data collection.

References

AAFC. (2013). “Watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices.” 〈http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/soilwater/watermgmt/fwm02s00.html〉 (Jun. 28, 2013).
Ashraf, M., Kahlown, M. A., and Ashfaq, A. (2007). “Impact of small dams on agriculture and groundwater development: A case study from Pakistan.” Agric. Water Manage., 92(1–2), 90–98.
Aviles, A., and Niell, F. X. (2007). “The control of a small dam in nutrient inputs to a hypertrophic estuary in a Mediterranean climate.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 180(1–4), 97–108.
Benaman, J., Christine, A. S., and Douglas, A. H. (2005). “Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 363–374.
Brainwood, M. A., Burgin, S., and Maheshwari, B. (2004). “Temporal variations in water quality of farm dams: Impacts of land use and water sources.” Agric. Water Manage., 70(2), 151–175.
Fiener, P., Auerswald, K., and Weigand, S. (2005). “Managing erosion and water quality in agricultural watersheds by small detention ponds.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 110(3–4), 132–142.
Gross, E. J., and Moglen, G. E. (2007). “Estimating the hydrological influence of Maryland state dams using GIS and the HEC-1 model.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 690–693.
Hope, J., Harker, D. B., and Townley, S. L. (2002). Long term land use trends for water quality protection, ten years of monitoring in the South Tobacco Creek watershed, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada—PFRA, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J. G. (2005). “Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management.” Hydrol. Process., 19(3), 749–762.
Koiter, A. J., Lobb, D. A., Owens, P. N., Tiessen, K. H. D., and Li, S. (2012). “Assessing the sources of suspended sediments in the streams of an agricultural watershed in the Canadian prairies using caesium-137 as a tracer.” EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts 14: 3925, European Geosciences Union, Munich, Germany.
Miklanek, P., Pekarova, P., Konicek, A., and Pekar, J. (2004). “Research note: Use of a distributed erosion model (AGNPS) for planning small reservoirs in the Upper Torysa basin.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8(6), 1186–1192.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, E. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Muletta, M. K., Nicklow, J. W., and Bekele, E. G. (2007). “Sensitivity of a distributed watershed simulation model to spatial scale.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 163–172.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual model.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2009). “Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): Theoretical documentation, version 2005.” Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Temple, TX.
Schneider, L. E., and McCuen, R. H. (2006). “Assessing the hydrologic performance of best management practices.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 278–281.
Schreider, S. Y., Jakeman, A. J., Letcher, R. A., Nathan, R. J., Neal, B. P., and Beavis, S. G. (2002). “Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: Farm dam development in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia.” J. Hydrol., 262(1–4), 84–98.
Smith, S. V., Renwick, W. H., Bartley, J. D., and Buddemeier, R. W. (2001). “Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape.” Sci. Total Environ., 299(1–3), 21–36.
Tiessen, K. H. D., Elliott, J. A., Stainton, M., Yarotski, J., Flaten, D. N., and Lobb, D. B. (2011). “The effectiveness of small-scale headwater storage dams and reservoirs on stream water quality and quantity in the Canadian prairies.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 66(3), 158–171.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1987). “United States Army Corps of Engineers HEC-1 flood hydrograph package.” Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2013). “Conservation effects assessment project.” 〈http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/technical/nra/ceap/〉 (Jun. 28, 2013).
Van Liew, M. W., Veith, T. L., Bosch, D. D., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). “Suitability of SWAT for the conservation effects assessment project: A comparison on USDA ARS watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 173–189.
Verstraeten, G., and Poesen, J. (2001). “Modelling the long-term sediment trap efficiency of small ponds.” Hydrol. Processes, 15(14), 2797–2819.
Verstraeten, G., and Poesen, J. (2002). “Using sediment deposits in small ponds to quantify sediment yield from small catchments: Possibilities and limitations.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 27(13), 1425–1439.
Yang, W., Rousseau, A. N., and Boxall, P. (2007). “An integrated economic-hydrologic modeling framework for the watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 62(6), 423–432.
Yarotski, J. B. (1996). “Canadian-Manitoba soil conservation agreement program, South Tobacco Creek pilot project of headwater storage on runoff peaks.” Hydrology Rep. No. 142, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada—PFRA, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Young, R. A., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D., and Anderson, W. P. (1989). “AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 44(2), 168–173.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 10October 2014

History

Received: Jul 19, 2013
Accepted: Apr 1, 2014
Published online: Apr 3, 2014
Published in print: Oct 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 30, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scientist, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1; and Senior Visiting Scholar, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wanhong Yang [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. E-mail: [email protected]
Zhiqiang Yu [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. E-mail: [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1. E-mail: [email protected]
Jim Yarotski [email protected]
Hydrologic Engineer, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 0M3. E-mail: [email protected]
Jane Elliott [email protected]
Research Scientist, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 3H5. E-mail: [email protected]
Kevin Tiessen [email protected]
Senior Program Specialist, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H9. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share