Rainfall Uncertainty in Flood Forecasting: Belgian Case Study of Rivierbeek
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 10
Abstract
Rainfall forecast errors are the key sources of uncertainty in flood forecasting. To quantify this uncertainty operational flood forecasting centers make use of rainfall forecasts obtained by ensemble predicting systems (EPS). The EPS forecasts are generated by perturbing the initial conditions of numerical weather prediction models. Question, however, remains whether these EPS cover the real forecast uncertainty range and whether the EPS-based uncertainty estimates are similar to the ones obtained by statistical methods. Both questions are addressed in this research based on data of a flood forecasting system in Belgium. Comparison is made between the uncertainty bounds generated by EPS and by a Monte Carlo-based statistical method after historical forecasted rainfall uncertainty analysis. The latter analysis calculates the error between forecasted and observed catchment rainfall, taking into account the dependency on lead time and rainfall depth. The forecasted rainfall errors are described by truncated normal distributions, which allow to calculate the full uncertainty distribution on a deterministic rainfall forecast. It is concluded that the EPS may underestimate the influence of the total forecasted rainfall uncertainty. For the Belgian case study of the Rivierbeek, the forecasted rainfall uncertainty explains 30% of the total river flow forecast uncertainty.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The results presented in this paper were obtained by a research project on flood forecasting for Flanders Hydraulics Research of the Flemish Government of Belgium. The authors also wish to thank the Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium for providing the EPS data.
References
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed model: Calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279–298.
Buizza, R., et al. (1998). “Impacts of model resolution and ensemble size on the performance of an ensemble prediction system.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc., 124, 1935–1960.
Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P.L., Toth, Z., Pellerin, G., Wei, M., and Zhu, Y. (2005). “A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems.” Month. Weather Rev., 133, 1076–1097.
Buizza, R., Miller, M., and Palmer, T. N. (1999). “Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc., 125, 2887–2908.
Choi, H. T., and Beven, K. J. (2007). “Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework.” J. Hydrol., 332(3–4), 316–336.
Cloke, H. L., and Pappenberger, F. (2009). “Ensemble flood forecasting: A review.” J. Hydrol., 375(3–4), 613–626.
Coccia, G., and Todini, E. (2011). “Recent developments in predictive uncertainty assessment based on the model conditional processor approach.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3253–3274.
Dietrich, J., et al. (2009). “Assessing uncertainties in flood forecasts for decision making: Prototype of an operational flood management system integrating ensemble predictions.” Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci., 9, 1529–1540.
Fortin, V., Favre, A., and Saïd, M. (2006). “Probabilistic forecasting from ensemble prediction systems: improving upon the best-member method by using a different weight and dressing kernel for each member.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc., 132(617), 1349–1369.
Gerard, L., Piriou, J.-M., Brožková, R., Geleyn, J.-F., and Banciu, D. (2009). “Cloud and precipitation parametrization in a meso-gamma-scale operational weather prediction model.” Mon. Weather Rev., 137(11), 3960–3977.
Golding, B. (2000). “Quantitative precipitation forecasting in the UK.” J. Hydrol., 239(1–4), 286–305.
Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hostache, R., Matgen, P., Montanari, A., Montanari, M., Hoffmann, L., and Pfister, L. (2011). “Propagation of uncertainties in coupled hydro-meteorological forecasting systems: A stochastic approach for the assessment of the total predictive uncertainty.” Atmos. Res., 100(2–3), 263–274.
Krzysztofowicz, R. (2002). “Bayesian system for probabilistic river stage forecasting.” J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 16–40.
Madsen, H. (2000). “Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives.” J. Hydrol., 235(3–4), 276–288.
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N., and Petrogliatis, T. (1996). “The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation.” Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc., 122, 73–119.
Montanari, A. (2005). “Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 41(8), W08406.
Nielsen, S. A., and Hansen, E. (1973). “Numerical simulation of the rainfall-runoff process on a daily basis.” Nord. Hydrol., 4, 171–190.
Palmer, T., and Buizza, R. (2007). “Fifteenth anniversary of EPS.” ECMWF Newsletter 114, Winter 07/08, 14, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, U.K.
Pappenberger, F., et al. (2005). “Cascading model uncertainty from medium range weather forecasts (10 days) through a rainfall-runoff model to flood inundation predictions within the European Flood Forecasting System (EFFS).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9(4), 381–393.
Park, Y.-Y., Buizza, R., and Leutbecher, M. (2008). TIGGE: Preliminary results on comparing and combining ensembles, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, U.K.
Rossa, A., et al. (2011). “The COST 731 action: A review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems.” Atmos. Res., 100(2–3), 150–167.
Roulin, E., and Vannitsem, S. (2005). “Skill of medium-range hydrological ensemble predictions.” J. Hydrometeorol., 6(5), 729–744.
Roulin, E., and Vannitsem, S. (2012). “Postprocessing of ensemble precipitation predictions with extended logistic regression based on hindcasts.” Mon. Weather Rev., 140(3), 874–888.
Salamon, P., and Feyen, L. (2010). “Disentangling uncertainties in distributed hydrological modeling using multiplicative error models and sequential data assimilation.” Water Resour. Res., 46(12), W12501.
Van Steenbergen, N., Ronsyn, J., and Willems, P. (2012). “A non-parametric data-based approach for probabilistic flood forecasting in support of uncertainty communication.” Environ. Modell. Software, 33, 92–105.
Van Steenbergen, N., and Willems, P. (2014). “Uncertainty decomposition and reduction in river flood forecasting: Belgian case study.” J. Flood Risk Manage., (in press).
Verkade, J. S., Brown, J. D., Reggiani, P., and Weerts, A. H. (2013). “Post-processing ECMWF precipitation and temperature ensemble reforecasts for operational hydrologic forecasting at various spatial scales.” J. Hydrol., 501, 73–91.
Willems, P. (2008). “Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling.” Water Res., 42(13), 3539–3551.
Willems, P. (2012). “Model uncertainty analysis by variance decomposition.” Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 42–44, 21–30.
Zappa, M., Jaun, S., Germann, U., Walser, A., and Fundel, F. (2011). “Superposition of uncertainties in operational flood forecasting chains.” Atmos. Res., 100(2–3), 246–262.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19 • Issue 10 • October 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 19, 2013
Accepted: Mar 24, 2014
Published online: Mar 26, 2014
Published in print: Oct 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 25, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.