Technical Papers
Dec 18, 2013

Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency Using Different Climate Models and Downscaling Approaches

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 8

Abstract

The analysis of the climate change impact on flood frequency represents an important issue for water resources management and flood risk mitigation. However, for small/medium catchments (<1,000km2), the spatial-temporal resolution of global circulation models (GCMs) output is not adequate (>40,000km2) and downscaling procedures are required. In this paper, two different GCMs selected among the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 3 models, the Hadley Center Coupled Model, the Parallel Climate Model, and two statistical downscaling approaches, (1) delta change, and (2) quantile mapping, are compared. For the generation of long hourly time series of rainfall, temperature, and discharge, stochastic weather generators coupled with a continuous rainfall-runoff model are employed. Therefore, the frequency of annual maxima rainfall and discharge is projected for the future period 2070–2099 over three small subcatchments in the Upper Tiber River Basin, central Italy. Results reveal that both the GCMs and downscaling methods play a significant role in the determination of the climate change impact for future scenarios, mainly in terms of annual maxima values. By comparing the future (2070–2099) with the baseline period (1961–1990), all GCMs project a decrease of mean annual rainfall (30%) and an increase of mean annual temperature (40%). However, in terms of annual maxima (of rainfall and discharge) the results are found to be dependent on the selected GCM and downscaling method. On one hand, through the application of the delta change method, both GCMs project a decrease in the flood frequency curves. On the other hand, if the quantile mapping downscaling method is considered, the Hadley Center Coupled Model 3 projects a decrease in the frequency of annual maxima discharge; the opposite occurs for the Parallel Climate Model. The hydrological characteristics of the study catchments play an important role in the assessment of the climate change impacts. For that, the need to use ensemble GCM results and multiple downscaling methods is underlined.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers wish to thank R. Rosi for technical assistance. They are also grateful to Umbria Region for providing most of the analyzed data. The writers are also grateful to the four anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. The writers want to make memory by this paper of the coauthor Dr. Florisa Melone, who passed away on October 28, 2012. The sole consolation is that the writers have had the honour and privilege of working with Dr. Malone, but even more the joy of Dr. Malone’s friendship.

References

Brocca, L., et al. (2011a). “Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe.” Rem. Sensing Environ., 115(12), 3390–3408.
Brocca, L., Camici, S., Tarpanelli, A., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T. (2011b). “Analysis of climate change effects on floods frequency through a continuous hydrological modelling.” Climate change and its effects on water resources: NATO science for peace and security series C: Environmental security, Vol. 3, A. Baba, et al., eds., Springer, Netherlands, 97–104.
Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T. (2011c). “Distributed rainfall-runoff modelling for flood frequency estimation and flood forecasting.” Hydrol. Process., 25(18), 2801–2813.
Camici, S., Tarpanelli, A., Brocca, L., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T. (2011). “Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm-based rainfall-runoff modelling.” Water Resour. Res., 47(5),.
Cayan, D. R., Maurer, E. P., Dettinger, M. D., Tyree, M., and Hayhoe, K. (2008). “Climate change scenarios for the California region.” Clim. Change, 87(S1), 21–42.
Chen, H., Xu, C. Y., and Guo, S. (2012). “Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCMs, statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate change impacts on runoff.” J. Hydrol., 434–435, 36–45,.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., and Leconte, R. (2011a). “Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 401(3–4), 190–202.
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., Poulin, A., and Leconte, R. (2011b). “Overall uncertainty study of the hydrological impacts of climate change for a Canadian watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 47(12),.
Chiew, F. H. S., et al. (2010). “Comparison of runoff modelled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical and future climates.” J. Hydrol., 387(1–2), 10–23.
Cowpertwait, P. (1991). “Further developments of the Neyman-Scott clustered point process for modeling rainfall.” Water Resour. Res., 27(7), 1431–1438.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P., Kilsby, C. G., and O’Connell, P. E. (2002). “A space-time Neyman-Scott model of rainfall: Empirical analysis of extremes.” Water Resour. Res., 38(8), 1–14.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P., O’Connell, P. E. O., Metcalfe, A. V., and Mawdsley, J. A. (1996). “Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. I. Single-site fitting validation.” J. Hydrol., 175(1–4), 17–46.
Das, T., Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., and Hidalgo, H. G. (2011). “Potential increase in floods in California Sierra Nevada under future climate projections.” Clim. Change, 109(1), 71–94.
Déqué, M., et al. (2007). “An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe: Assessing uncertainties in model projections.” Clim. Change, 81, 53–70.
Dettinger, M. (2012). “Projections and downscaling of 21st century temperatures, precipitation, radiative fluxes and winds for the southwestern US, with focus on Lake Tahoe.” Clim. Change, 116(1), 17–33.
Dibike, Y. B., and Coulibaly, P. (2005). “Hydrological impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 307(1–4), 145–163.
Dobler, C., Hagemann, S., Wilby, R. L., and Stotter, J. (2012). “Quantifying different sources of uncertainty in hydrological projections at the catchment scale.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9(7), 8173–8211.
Faggian, P., and Giorgi, F. (2009). “An analysis of global model projections over Italy, with particular attention to the Italian Greater Alpine Region (GAR).” Clim. Change, 96(1–2), 239–258.
Fiseha, B. M., Melesse, A. M., Romano, E., Volpi, E., and Fiori, A. (2012). “Statistical downscaling of precipitation and temperature for the Upper Tiber Basin in Central Italy.” Int. J. Water Sci., 1(3), 1–14.
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebaldi, C. (2007). “Review. Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: Recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling.” Int. J. Climatol., 27(12), 1547–1578.
Groppelli, B., Bocchiola, D., and Rosso, R. (2010). “Precipitation downscaling using random cascades: A case study in Italy.” Adv. Geosci., 26, 39–44,.
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., and Engen-Skaugen, T. (2012). “Technical note: Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using quantile mapping–A comparison of methods.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9(9), 6185–6201.
Hayhoe, H., et al. (2004). “Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101(34), 12422–12427,.
Hewitson, B. C., and Crane, R. G. (1996). “Climate downscaling: Techniques and application.” Clim. Res., 7, 85–95.
Horton, P., Schaefli, B., Mezghani, A., Hingray, B., and Musy, A. (2006). “Assessment of climate-change impacts on alpine discharge regimes with climate model uncertainty.” Hydrol. Process., 20(10), 2091–2109.
Ines, A. V., and Hansen, J. W. (2006). “Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies.” Agr. Forest Meteorol., 138(1–4), 44–53.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). “Climate change 2007: The physical science basis.” Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, and M. Manning, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kay, A., Davies, H., Bell, V., and Jones, R. (2009). “Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: Flood frequency in England.” Clim. Change, 92(1–2), 41–63.
Khazaei, M. R., Zahabiyoun, B., and Saghafian, B. (2012).“Assessment of climate change impact on floods using weather generator and continuous rainfall-runoff model.” Int. J. Climatol., 32(13), 1997–2006.
Lafon, T., Dadson, S., Buys, G., and Prudhomme, C. (2013). “Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: A comparison of methods.” Int. J. Climatol., 33(6), 1367–1381.
Li, H., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F. (2010). “Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching.” J. Geophys. Res., 115(D10), D10101.
Lofgren, B. M., Hunter, T. S., and Wilbarger, J. (2011). “Effects of using air temperature as a proxy for potential evapotranspiration in climate change scenarios of Great Lakes Basin hydrology.” J. Great Lakes Res., 37(4), 744–752.
Maurer, E. P., and Hidalgo, H. G. (2008). “Utility of daily vs. monthly large scale climate data: An intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12(2), 551–563.
Minville, M., Brissette, F., and Leconte, R. (2008). “ Uncertainty of the impact of climate change on the hydrology of a Nordic watershed.” J. Hydrol., 358(1–2), 70–83.
Montanari, A., Rosso, R., and Taqqu, M. S. (1997). “Fractionally differenced ARIMA models applied to hydrologic time series: Identification, estimation and simulation.” Water Resour. Res., 33(5), 1035–1044.
Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2000). Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Piani, C., Haerter, J., and Coppola, E. (2010). “Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe.” Theor. Appl. Climatol., 99(1–2), 187–192.
Prudhomme, C., and Davies, H. (2009). “Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 1: Baseline climate.” Clim. Change, 93(1–2), 177–195.
Prudhomme, C., Jakob, D., and Svensson, C. (2003).”Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments.” J. Hydrol., 277(1–2), 1–23.
Prudhomme, C., Reynard, N., and Crooks, S. (2002). “Downscaling of global climate models for flood frequency analysis: Where are we now?” Hydrol. Process., 16(6), 1137–1150.
Romano, E., Petrangeli, A. B., and Preziosi, E. (2011). “Spatial and time analysis of rainfall in the Tiber River Basin (central Italy) in relation to discharge measurements (1920–2010).” Procedia Env. Sci., 7, 258–263,.
Romano, E., and Preziosi, E. (2012). “Precipitation pattern analysis in the Tiber River Basin (central Italy) using standardized indices.” Int. J. Climatol., 33(7), 1781–1792.
Samadi, S., Carbone, G. J., Mahdavi, M., Sharif, F., and Bihamta, M. R. (2012). “Statistical downscaling of climate data to estimate streamflow in a semi-arid catchment.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9(z4), 4868–4918,.
Schmidli, J., et al. (2007). “Statistical and dynamical downscaling of precipitation: An evaluation and comparison of scenarios for the European Alps.” J. Geophys. Res., 112(D4), D04105,.
Segui, P. Q., Ribes, A., Martin, E., Habets, F., and Boe, J. (2010). “Comparison of three downscaling method in simulating the impact of climate change on the hydrology of Mediterranean basins.” J. Hydrol., 383(1–2), 111–124.
Stoll, S., Franssen, H. J., Butts, M., and Kinzelbach, W. (2011). “Analysis of the impact of climate change on groundwater related hydrological fluxes: A multi-model approach including different downscaling methods.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(1), 21–38.
Sunyer, M. A., Madsen, H., and Ang, P. H. (2011). “A comparison of different regional climate models and statistical downscaling methods for extreme rainfall estimation under climate change.” Atmos. Res., 119–128.
Teutschbein, C., and Seibert, J. (2012). “Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods.” J. Hydrol., 456–457, 12–29.
Teutschbein, C., Wetterhall, F., and Seibert, J. (2011). “Evaluation of different downscaling techniques for hydrological climate-change impact studies at the catchment scale.” Clim. Dyn., 37(9–10), 2087–2105.
Themeßl, M. J., Gobiet, A., and Leuprecht, A. (2011). “Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate models.” Int. J. Climatol., 31(10), 1530–1544.
Veijalainen, N., Lotsari, E., Alho, P., Vehvilainen, B., and Kayhko, J. (2010). “National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland.” J. Hydrol., 391(3–4), 333–350.
Wigley, T. M. L., and Jones, P. D. (1987). “England and Wales precipitation: A discussion of recent changes in variability and an update to 1985.” J. Climatol., 7(3), 231–246,.
Wilby, R. L., and Harris, I. (2006). “A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK.” Water Resour. Res., 42(2), W02419,.
Wood, A. W., Leung, L. R., Sridhar, V., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2004). “Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs.” Clim. Change, 62(1–3), 189–216.
Xu, C. Y., Widen, E., and Halldin, S. (2005). “Modelling hydrological consequences of climate change–Progress and challenges.” Adv. Atmos. Sci., 22(6), 789–797.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 8August 2014

History

Received: Oct 19, 2012
Accepted: Dec 16, 2013
Published online: Dec 18, 2013
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 20, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, 06128 Perugia, Italy (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Researcher, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, 06128 Perugia, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, 06128 Perugia, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
T. Moramarco, M.ASCE [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, 06128 Perugia, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share