Technical Papers
Dec 26, 2012

Improving Groundwater Predictions Utilizing Seasonal Precipitation Forecasts from General Circulation Models Forced with Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 1

Abstract

Recent studies have found a significant association between climatic variability and basin hydroclimatology, particularly groundwater levels, over the southeast United States. The research reported in this paper evaluates the potential in developing 6-month-ahead groundwater-level forecasts based on the precipitation forecasts from ECHAM 4.5 General Circulation Model Forced with Sea Surface Temperature forecasts. Ten groundwater wells and nine streamgauges from the USGS Groundwater Climate Response Network and Hydro-Climatic Data Network were selected to represent groundwater and surface water flows, respectively, having minimal anthropogenic influences within the Flint River Basin in Georgia, United States. The writers employ two low-dimensional models [principle component regression (PCR) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA)] for predicting groundwater and streamflow at both seasonal and monthly timescales. Three modeling schemes are considered at the beginning of January to predict winter (January, February, and March) and spring (April, May, and June) streamflow and groundwater for the selected sites within the Flint River Basin. The first scheme (model 1) is a null model and is developed using PCR for every streamflow and groundwater site using previous 3-month observations (October, November, and December) available at that particular site as predictors. Modeling schemes 2 and 3 are developed using PCR and CCA, respectively, to evaluate the role of precipitation forecasts in improving monthly and seasonal groundwater predictions. Modeling scheme 3, which employs a CCA approach, is developed for each site by considering observed groundwater levels from nearby sites as predictands. The performance of these three schemes is evaluated using two metrics (correlation coefficient and relative RMS error) by developing groundwater-level forecasts based on leave-five-out cross-validation. Results from the research reported in this paper show that using precipitation forecasts in climate models improves the ability to predict the interannual variability of winter and spring streamflow and groundwater levels over the basin. However, significant conditional bias exists in all the three modeling schemes, which indicates the need to consider improved modeling schemes as well as the availability of longer time-series of observed hydroclimatic information over the basin.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alley, W. M., Healy, R. W., LaBaugh, J. W., and Reilly, T. E. (2002). “Flow and storage in groundwater systems.” Science, 296(5575), 1985–1990.
Almanaseer, N., and Sankarasubramanian, A. (2012). “Role of climate variability in modulating the surface water and groundwater interaction over the southeast United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1001–1010.
ArcGIS 9.1 [Computer software]. Esri, Redlands, CA.
Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). “An analysis of transformations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26(2), 211–252.
Daly, C., Neilson, R. P., and Philips, D. L. (1994). “A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain.” J. Appl. Meteorol., 33(2), 140–158.
Devineni, N., and Sankarasubramanian, A. (2010). “Improving the prediction of winter precipitation and temperature over the continental United States: Role of ENSO state in developing multimodel combinations.” Mon. Weather Rev., 138(6), 2447–2468.
Devineni, N., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Ghosh, S. (2008). “Multi-model ensembling of probabilistic streamflow forecasts: Role of predictor state space in skill evaluation.” Water Resour. Res., 44(1), W09404.
ECHAM 4.5 [Computer software]. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, 〈http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/SOURCES/.IRI/.FD/.ECHAM4p5/.Forecast/.ca_sst/〉 (Oct. 3, 2013).
Green, T. R., Taniguchi, M., and Kooi, H. (2007). “Potential impacts of climate change and human activity on subsurface water resources.” Vadose Zone J., 6(3), 531–532.
Hanson, R. T., and Dettinger, M. D. (2005). “Ground water/surface water responses to global climate simulations, Santa Clara–Calleguas Basin, Ventura, California.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(3), 517–536.
Hanson, R. T., Izbicki, J. A., Reichard, E. G., Edwards, B. E., Land, M. T., and Martin, P. (2009). “Comparison of ground-water flow in southern California coastal aquifers.” Earth sciences in the urban ocean—The southern California continental borderland, H. J. Lee and B. Normark, eds., Vol. 454, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 345–373.
Holman, I. P. (2006). “Climate change impacts on ground-water recharge–Uncertainty, shortcomings, and the way forward?” Hydrogeol. J., 14(5), 637–647.
Kumar, D. N., Lall, U., and Peterson, M. (2000). “Multi-site disaggregation of monthly to daily streamflow.” Water Resour. Res., 36(7), 1823–1834.
Landman, W. A., and Goddard, L. (2003). “Model output statistics applied to multi-model ensemble forecasts for southern Africa.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and Oceanography, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 249–250.
Li, S., and Goddard, L. (2005). “Retrospective forecasts with the ECHAM4.5 AGCM.”, IRI for Climate and Society, Palisades, NY.
Lim, K. J., et al. (2005). “Automated web GIS based hydrograph analysis tool, WHAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(6), 1407–1416.
Luo, L., Wood, E. F., and Pan, M. (2007). “Bayesian merging of multiple climate model forecast for seasonal hydrological predictions.” J. Geophys. Res., 112(D10), D10102.
Maurer, E., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2004). “Potential effects of long-lead hydrologic predictability on Missouri River main-stem reservoirs.” J. Clim., 17(1), 174–186.
Oh, J., and Sankarasubramanian, A. (2012). “Climate, streamflow and water quality interactions over the southeastern US.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(7), 2285–2298.
Roeckner, E. (1996). “The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM4: Model description and simulation of present-day climate.”, Hamburg, Germany.
Ropelewski, C. F., and Halpert, M. S. (1987). “Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El-Nino Southern Oscillation.” Mon. Weather Rev., 115(8), 1606–1626.
Sankarasubramanian, A., Lall, U., Devineni, N., and Espunevea, S. (2009). “Utility of operational streamflow forecasts in improving intra-seasonal water allocation.” J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 48(7), 1464–1482.
Sankarasubramanian, A., Lall, U., and Espuneva, S. (2008). “Role of retrospective forecasts of GCM forced with persisted SST anomalies in operational streamflow forecasts development.” J. Hydrometeorol., 9(2), 212–227.
Sankarasubramanian, A., and Vogel, R. M. (2002). “Comment on the paper: ‘Basin hydrologic response relations to distributed physiographic descriptors and climate’ by Karen Plaut Berger, Dara Entekhabi, 2001. Journal of Hydrology 247, 169–182.” J. Hydrol., 263(1), 257–261.
Slack, J. R., Lumb, A. M., and Landwehr, J. M. (1993). “Hydroclimatic data network (HCDN): A U.S. Geological Survey streamflow data set for the United States for the study of climate variation, 1874–1988.”, Reston, VA.
Sophocleous, M. A., Koelliker, J. K., Govindaraju, R. S., Birdie, T., Ramireddygari, S. R., and Perkins, S. P. (1999). “Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: The case of the Rattlesnake Creek Basin in south-central Kansas.” J. Hydrol., 214(1), 179–196.
Stedinger, J. R., and Vogel, R. M. (1984). “Disaggregation procedures for serially correlated flow vectors.” Water Resour. Res., 20(1), 47–56.
Stone, M. (1974). “Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with discussion).” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser B, 36(2), 111–147.
Tippett, M. K., Anderson, J. L., Bishop, C. H., Hamill, T. M., and Whitaker, J. S. (2003). “Ensemble square root filters.” Mon. Weather Rev., 131(7), 1485–1490.
Tootle, G. A., and Piechota, T. C. (2006). “Relationships between Pacific and Atlantic Ocean sea surface temperatures and U.S. streamflow variability.” Water Resour. Res., 42(7), W07411.
Torak, L. J., Painter, J. A., and Peck, M. F. (2010). “Geohydrology of the Aucilla-Suwannee-Ochlockonee River Basin, south-central Georgia and adjacent parts of Florida.”, Reston, VA.
USGS. (2007). “U.S. Geological Survey ground-water climate response network.” U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2007–3003, Reston, VA.
Vogel, R. M., and Sankarasubramanian, A. (2005). USGS hydro-climatic data network (HCDN): Monthly climate database, 1951–1990, Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Wilks, D. S. (1995). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, Academic, New York.
Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (2002). “Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States.” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 107(D20), ACL-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 1January 2014
Pages: 87 - 98

History

Received: Mar 7, 2012
Accepted: Dec 21, 2012
Published online: Dec 26, 2012
Discussion open until: May 26, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Naser Almanaseer
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Water Resources and Environmental Management, Al-Balqa Applied Univ., Al-Salt 19117, Jordan.
A. Sankarasubramanian [email protected]
M.ASCE
Associate Professor, Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Dept., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jerad Bales
Chief Scientist for Water, United States Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., Reston, VA 20192-0002.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share