Technical Papers
Dec 22, 2012

Forecast Changes in Runoff Quality and Quantity from Urbanization in the DelMarVa Peninsula

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 1

Abstract

Anticipating future trends in land development and climate change is a constant challenge for engineers and planners who wish to effectively compensate for the resulting changes in storm water runoff that will inevitably follow. This study is a regional attempt at predicting how changes in land use will affect runoff characteristics in 17 watersheds throughout the Delaware-Maryland-Virginia (DelMarVa) Peninsula when compared to the current conditions. The authors coupled demographic and urban growth models to create maps showing the location of predicted urban land use for the year 2030, and then used nutrient loading and rainfall-runoff models to forecast the consequences of such growth on the magnitude of changes that can occur in runoff quality and quantity. The authors found that likely change in urban land use would lead to decreases in sediment and nitrogen loads by up to 8 and 37%, respectively; that phosphorus loads would increase or decrease depending on the type of existing land use that was replaced by urban land use; and that the 2-year peak flow would change by 2–9% across all scenarios, whereas relative changes to flood peaks for the 100-year peak flows were considerably smaller. Sensitivity analysis also was performed. The authors’ modeling provides a planning-oriented look into the effects of increased urban development on the predominantly agrarian study area, the majority of which drains to the Chesapeake Bay. The modeling also illustrates a useful approach for evaluating consequences of future planning and management decisions within a desired region.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this paper were greatly improved by the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers and the editorial staff at the Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. The authors thank all for their careful review of the work. This report was prepared by the authors under awards (NA05OAR4171042/SA7528085-S SA7528085-Z) from the Maryland Sea Grant, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Maryland Sea Grant, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the U.S. Department of Commerce.

References

Barbosa, S. M., and Silva, M. E. (2009). “Low-frequency sea-level change in Chesapeake Bay: Changing seasonality and long-term trends.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 83(1), 30–38.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. J. L., Donigian, J. A. S., and Johanson, R. C. (1993). “Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): Users manual for release 10.”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Ciavola, S. (2011). “Using SLEUTH land cover predictions to estimate changes in runoff quality and quantity in the DelMarVa peninsula.” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Clarke, K. C., and Gaydos, L. J. (1998). “Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore.” Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci., 12(7), 699–714.
Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., and Gaydos, L. (1997). “A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des., 24(2), 247–261.
S. J. Goetz, C. A. Jantz, S. D. Prince, A. J. Smith, D. Varlyguin and R. K. Wright, eds. (2004). “Integrated analysis of ecosystem interactions with land use change: The Chesapeake Bay watershed.” Ecosystems and land use change, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
Hejazi, M. I., and Moglen, G. E. (2008). “The effect of climate and land use change on flow duration in the Maryland Piedmont region.” Hydrol. Processes, 22, 4710–4722.
Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C., and Clarke, K. C. (2003). “The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling.” Remote Sens. Environ., 86(3), 286–302.
Homer, C., et al. (2007). “Completion of the 2001 national land cover data-base for the conterminous United States.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 73(4), 337–341.
Hopkins, K., Brown, B., Linker, L. C., and Mader, L. C., Jr. (2000). Chesapeake Bay watershed model land uses and linkages to the airshed and estuarine models, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). “Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.” M. L. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment rep. of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden and C. E. Hanson, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Jantz, C. A., Goetz, S. J., Donato, D., and Claggett, P. (2010). “Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 34(1), 1–16.
Jantz, C. A., Goetz, S. J., and Shelley, M. K. (2004). “Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des., 31(2), 251–271.
Kemp, W. M., et al. (2005). “Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: Historical trends and ecological interactions.” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 303, 1–29.
Moglen, G. E. (2007). GISHydro Nutrient Loading Interpolator for the Chesapeake Bay Program Model—Final Rep., Maryland Dept. of the Environment, Baltimore.
Moglen, G. E., Ciavola, S. J., Jantz, C. A., Ritter, B., Beck, A. J., and Reilly, J. (2011). Developing a Decision Support System for the DelMarVa Peninsula: A Tool to Integrate Alternative Growth Scenarios and Selected Environmental Assessment Methods into Local Land Use Planning—Final Rep., Maryland Sea Grant, College Park, MD.
Najjar, R. G., et al. (2010). “Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 86(1), 1–20.
National Oceanic, and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center. (2009). “Coastal change analysis program regional land cover.” 〈http://www.csc.noaa.gov/〉 (Oct. 28, 2009).
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (2009). WinTR-20 computer program for project formulation hydrology, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Rafiee, R., Mahiny, A. S., Khorasani, N., Darvishsefat, A. A., and Danekar, A. (2009). “Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM).” Cities, 26(1), 19–26.
Reilly, J. (1997a). “A method of assigning population and a progress report on the use of a spatial simulation model.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des., 24(5), 725–739.
Reilly, J. (1997b). “A methodology to assign regional employment to municipalities.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 21(6), 407–424.
Roberts, A. D., Prince, S. D., Jantz, C. A., and Goetz, S. J. (2009). “Effects of projected future urban land cover on nitrogen and phosphorus runoff to Chesapeake Bay.” Ecol. Eng., 35(12), 1758–1772.
Schueler, T. R. (1987). Controlling urban runoff: A practical manual for planning and designing urban BMPs, Dept. of Environmental Programs.
Shields, C. A., et al. (2008). “Streamflow distribution of non-point source nitrogen export from urban-rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.” Water Resour. Res., 44(9), W09416.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1973). “A method for estimating volume and rate of runoff in small watersheds.”, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1984). “Computer program for project formulation.”, Washington, DC.
Torrens, P. M., and O’Sullivan, D. (2001). “Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here?” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des., 28(2), 163–168.
USGS. (2003). “Project gigalopolis: Urban and land cover modeling.” 〈http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/〉 (Oct. 28, 2009).
Walter, R. C., and Merritts, D. J. (2008). “Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills.” Science, 319(5861), 299–304.
Wu, X. Q., Hu, Y. M., He, H. S., Bu, R. C., Onsted, J., and Xi, F. M. (2009). “Performance evaluation of the SLEUTH model in the Shenyang metropolitan area of northeastern China.” Environ. Model. Assess., 14(2), 221–230.
Yeh, A. G. O., and Li, X. (2001). “A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des., 28(5), 733–753.
Yin, J. J., Schlesinger, M. E., and Stouffer, R. J. (2009). “Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States.” Nat. Geosci., 2(4), 262–266.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 19Issue 1January 2014
Pages: 1 - 9

History

Received: May 24, 2011
Accepted: Dec 20, 2012
Published online: Dec 22, 2012
Discussion open until: May 22, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suzanne J. Ciavola
A.M.ASCE
Engineer, AECOM, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Claire A. Jantz
Associate Professor, Dept. of Geography and Earth Science, Shippensburg Univ., Shippensburg, PA 19444.
James Reilly
Consultant, Reilly Consulting, Philadelphia, PA 17257.
Glenn E. Moglen [email protected]
F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Falls Church, VA 22043 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share