Efficient Calibration Technique under Irregular Response Surface
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 9
Abstract
Conceptual rainfall-runoff models that aim at predicting streamflow from the knowledge of rainfall over a catchment are a basic tool for flood forecasting. The parameter calibration of a conceptual model usually involves the selection of an automatic optimization algorithm to search for the parameter values that minimize the distance between the simulated and observed data. However, practical experience with model calibration suggests that traditional optimization methods, such as the Newton-Raphson, conjugate gradient, and downhill simplex methods, are easily trapped in local minimums because the objective function surface is rough, caused by model structure errors and data errors. The across-ridge calibration method (ARC), an effective and efficient methodology for searching global optimization problem, is proposed in this paper. The method searches for all local optima in a fixed boundary, which makes it less susceptible to the irregularity of the response surface. The features and capabilities of ARC are illustrated by means of a binary function, an ideal conceptual rainfall-runoff model (Xinanjiang model) without model and data errors and a real model (Xinanjiang model) with structure and data errors. The results indicate that the proposed across-ridge calibration method can converge quickly from any starting point even when the response surface is rough. The optimized parameter sets for the Xinanjiang model (XAJ) are unique and conceptually realistic; the simulation performance of these parameters is reasonable and efficient.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901015/41001011/51079038/40930635), the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51190090, 51190091), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B1020062/B1020072), the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education, China (20090094120008), the Special Fund of State Key Laboratory of China (2009586412, 2009585412), the Common Will Vocation Science Research Funding of the Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (200701031), and the Key Program of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2009C13011).
References
Bao, W. M. (2006). “The analysis about the hydrology forecasting.” Chapter 10, Hydrological forecasting, China Water Power, Beijing, 92–137 (in Chinese).
Bao, W. M., Zhang, X. Q., and Qu, S. M. (2009). “Dynamic correction of roughness in the hydrodynamic model.” J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B, 21(2), 255–263.
Cheney, E. W., and and Goldstein, A. A. (1959). “Newton's method for convex programming and Tchebycheff approximation.” Numer. Math., 1(1), 253–268.
Cheng, C. T., Ou, C. P., and Chau, K. W. (2002). “Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multiobjective rainfall-runoff model calibration.” J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 72–86.
Cheng, C. T., Wang, W. C., Xu, D. M., and Chau, K. W. (2008). “Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(7), 895–909.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015–1031.
Franchini, M., and Galeati, G. (1997). “Comparing several genetic algorithm schemes for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 42(3), 357–379.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S. (1985). “The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative-based optimization algorithms.” Water Resour. Res., 21(4), 473–485.
Henstens, M. R., and Stierel, E. (1952). “Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems.” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 49, 409.
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Johnston, P. R., and Pilgrim, D. H. (1976). “Parameter optimization for watershed models.” Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 477–486.
Madsen, H. (2000a). “Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives.” J. Hydrol., 235, 276–288.
Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R. (1965). “A simplex method for function minimization.” Comput. J., 7(4), 308–313.
Pickup, G. (1977). “Testing the efficiencies of algorithms and strategies for automatic calibration of rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 22(2), 257–274.
Powell, M. J. D. (1964). “An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives.” Comput. J., 7(2), 155–162.
Qu, S. M., Bao, W. M., Shi, P., Yu, Z. B., and Jiang, P. (2009). “Water-stage forecasting in a multitributary tidal river using a bidirectional Muskingum method.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(12), 1299–1307.
Ren, Q., and Chen, Y. B., (2010). “Global sensitivity analysis of Xinanjiang model parameters based on extend FAST method.” Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 3, 56–61 (in Chinese).
Ritzel, B. J., and Wayland Eheart, J. (1994). “Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem.” Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1589–1603.
Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). “An automatic method of finding the greatest of least value of a function.” Comput. J., 3(3), 303–307.
Savic, D. A., Walters, G. A., and Davidson, J. W. (1999). “A genetic programming approach to rainfall-runoff modeling.” Water Resour. Manage., 13(3), 219–231.
Sorooshian, S., and Brazil, E. L. (1988). “Comparison of Newton-type and direct search algorithms for calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 24(5), 691–700.
Vasques, J. A., Mailer, H. R., Lence, B. J., Tolson, B. A., and Foschi, R. O. (2000). “Achieving water quality system reliability using genetic algorithms.” J. Environ. Eng., 126(10), 954–962.
Wang, Q. J. (1991). “The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2467–2471.
Wang, W. C., Chau, K. W., Cheng, C. T., and Qiu, L. (2009). “A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series.” J. Hydrol., 374(3), 294–306.
Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., and Li, Y. S. (2009). “Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques.” Water Resour. Res., 45(8), W08432.
Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (1996). “Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Sensitivity to calibration data.” J. Hydrol., 181(1–4), 23–48.
Zhang, L., and Guan, Y. Q. (2008). “Empirical study on parameter sensitivity analysis of Xin’anjiang model.” Water Resour. Power, 5, 123–125 (in Chinese).
Zhao, R. J. (1992). “The Xinanjiang model applied in China.” J. Hydrol., 135(1–4), 371–381.
Zhao, R. J., Zhang, Y. L., Fang, L. R., Liu, X. R., and Zhang, Q. S. (1980). “The Xinanjiang model.” Hydrological Forecasting Proc., Oxford Symp., IAHS, Rennes, France, 351–356.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 16, 2011
Accepted: Sep 25, 2012
Published online: Sep 28, 2012
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2013
Published in print: Sep 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.