Assessment of Hydrologic Controls on Applicability of Routing Methods
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 8
Abstract
Various applicability criteria have been developed to determine the appropriateness of different hydraulic routing methods (e.g., kinematic, diffusive, or dynamic) a priori (i.e., before any routing is done). However, little has been done to account for hydrologic variability and basin size in these criteria. To account for hydrologic variability and basin size in this paper, an existing applicability criteria for routing methods is linked analytically to a model of peak flow, a simple stochastic representation of rainfall, and relationships of river basin geomorphology. This linkage provides a novel way for understanding and quantifying the interrelationship between basin-scale hydrologic phenomena and routing methods. Using this linkage, the aim of this paper is to explore and assess the applicability of routing methods in strongly coupled systems or headwater basins. To illustrate and assess the linkage, the Illinois River basin is used. From this assessment, the diffusive and dynamic contributions are both found to increase for the general condition of an increasing peak flow and decreasing time to peak at a given basin size. After accounting for scale dependencies, the mean diffusive and dynamic contributions are found to increase with the basin size. The rate of increase seems controlled by the interplay between the slope-area relationship and the scaling of the time to peak, which in turn depends on both the mean rainfall duration and the time of concentration in this paper. In terms of the annual maximum flood series, the dynamic and diffusive contributions show decreasing and increasing trends, respectively, as a function of the basin size for a fixed return period. The latter is found to depend on the scaling of peak floods and the slope-area relationship. For a fixed basin size, both the diffusive and dynamic contributions are found to increase with the return period. The developed framework is able to provide insight at the basin scale into the influence of hydrologic controls arising from climate, runoff, and geomorphology on the applicability of routing methods.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was performed while the author held a National Research Council Research Associateship Award at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Weather Service (NWS), Office of Hydrologic Development. The author thanks the editors and reviewers for their valuable comments, criticisms, and suggestions.
References
Brunner, G. W. (2008). HEC-RAS, river analysis system user’s manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
Dingman, S. L. (2007). “Analytical derivation of at-a-station hydraulic-geometry relations.” J. Hydrol., 334(1–2), 17–27.
Dodov, B., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (2004). “Generalized hydraulic geometry: Derivation based on a multiscaling formalism.” Water Resour. Res., 40(6), W06302.
Eagleson, P. S. (1972). “Dynamics of flood frequency.” Water Resour. Res., 8(4), 878–898.
Ferrick, M. (1985). “Analysis of river wave types.” Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 209–220.
Fiorentino, M., and Iacobellis, V. (2001). “New insights about the climatic and geologic control on the probability distribution of floods.” Water Resour. Res., 37(3), 721–730.
Fread, D. L. (1985). Applicability criteria for kinematic and diffusion routing models, Laboratory of Hydrology, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Silver Spring, MD.
Fread, D. L. (1993). “Flow routing.” Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 10.1–10.36.
Gioia, A., Iacobellis, V., Manfreda, S., and Fiorentino, M. (2008). “Runoff thresholds in derived flood frequency distributions.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12(6), 1295–1307.
Gottschalk, L., and Weingartner, R. (1998). “Distribution of peak flow derived from a distribution of rainfall volume and runoff coefficient, and a unit hydrograph.” J. Hydrol., 208(3–4), 148–162.
Guo, Y., and Markus, M. (2011). “Analytical probabilistic approach for estimating design flood peaks of small watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(11), 847–857.
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open channel flow, Prentice Hall, New York.
Iacobellis, V., and Fiorentino, M. (2000). “Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climatic appeal.” Water Resour. Res., 36(2), 469–482.
Koren, V., Reed, S., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., and Seo, D.-J. (2004). “Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US National Weather Service.” J. Hydrol., 291(3–4), 297–318.
Leopold, L. B. (1994). A view of the river, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T. (1953). “The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications.”, USGS, Washington, DC.
Lettenmaier, D. L., and Wood, E. F. (1993). “Hydrologic forecasting.” Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Li, H., Sivapalan, M., and Tian, F. (2012). “Comparative diagnostic analysis of runoff generation processes in Oklahoma DMIP2 basins: The Blue River and the Illinois River.” J. Hydrol., 418–419, 90–109.
McCuen, R. H. (2002). “Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(1), 43–48.
Mejia, A. I., and Reed, S. M. (2011a). “Evaluating the effects of simplified routing and parameterized cross section shapes with a coupled distributed hydrologic and hydraulic model.” J. Hydrol., 409(1–2), 512–524.
Mejia, A. I., and Reed, S. M. (2011b). “Role of channel and floodplain cross-section geometry in the basin response.” Water Resour. Res., 47(9), W09518.
Moramarco, T., Pandolfo, C., and Singh, V. P. (2008). “Accuracy of kinematic wave approximation for flood routing. II. Unsteady analysis.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(11), 1089–1096.
Morris, H. M. (1980). “The propagation of waves in shallow water flow with lateral flow.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 25(1), 25–32.
Moussa, R., and Bocquillon, C. (1996). “Criteria for the choice of flood-routing methods in natural channels.” J. Hydrol., 186(1–4), 1–30.
Moussa, R., and Bocquillon, C. (2000). “Approximation zones of the Saint-Venant equations for flood routing with overbank flow.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4(2), 251–260.
Nadarajah, S. (2007). “Exact distribution of the peak streamflow.” Water Resour. Res., 43(2), W02501.
Nash, J. E. (1960). “A unit hydrograph study with particular reference to British catchments.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 17(3), 249–282.
Paik, K., and Kumar, P. (2004). “Hydraulic geometry and the nonlinearity of the network instantaneous response.” Water Resour. Res., 40(3), W03602.
Plate, E. J. (2009). “Classification of hydrological models for flood management.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(10), 1939–1951.
Ponce, V. M., Li, R.-M., and Simons, D. B. (1978). “Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models.” J. Hydraul. Div., 104(HY3), 353–360.
Ponce, V. M., and Simons, D. B. (1977). “Shallow wave propagation in open channel flow.” J. Hydraul. Div., 103(HY12), 1461–1476.
Reed, S. (2010). “Lessons learned from transitioning NWS operational hydraulic models to HEC-RAS.” ASCE-EWRI World Water Congress 2010, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Reed, S., Schaake, J., and Zhang, Z. (2007). “A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency-based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations.” J. Hydrol., 337(3–4), 402–420.
Restrepo-Posada, P. J., and Eagleson, P. S. (1982). “Identification of independent rainstorms.” J. Hydrol., 55(1–4), 303–319.
Robinson, J., and Sivapalan, M. (1997). “An investigation into the physical causes of scaling and heterogeneity of regional flood frequency.” Water Resour. Res., 33(5), 1045–1059.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A. (1997). Fractal river basins: Chance and self-organization, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Singh, V. P. (1996). Kinematic wave modeling in water resources, surface-water hydrology, Wiley, New York.
Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Wood, E. F. (1987). “On hydrologic similarity: 2. A scaled model of storm runoff production.” Water Resour. Res., 23(12), 2266–2278.
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993). “Frequency analysis of extreme events.” Handbook of hydrology, D. R. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Tsai, C. W. (2003). “Applicability of kinematic, noninertia, and quasi-steady dynamic wave models to unsteady flow routing.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 129(8), 613–627.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18 • Issue 8 • August 2013
Pages: 948 - 957
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 19, 2011
Accepted: Jul 2, 2012
Published online: Aug 6, 2012
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2013
Published in print: Aug 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.