Modified Numerical Approach to Estimate Field Capacity
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 4
Abstract
Field capacity is one of the most commonly used soil parameters in irrigation systems and agriculture. Methods for determining field capacity are either time, pressure, or model based. The numerical approach to estimate field capacity using a model-based definition is found to be effective in its ability to predict field capacities; however, this modeling-based approach is difficult to run for some soil as the numerical model requires an extremely small time increment close to zero and some oscillations are produced while the top part of the soil column approaches near saturation. In this study, an approach using the Richards’ equation in conjunction with the modified van Genuchten–Mualem (MMVG) model to simulate variably saturated flow in estimating field capacity is developed. The MMVG model is found to be useful to avoid the numerical oscillations, and there is less effect from the negligible flux associated with the estimate of field capacity. For estimating the real-world soils’ field capacity, a combined soil data set was developed from two wide-ranging databases. A new neural-network pedotransfer function (PTF) was developed to match data set values and objected values calculated in the MMVG model. Using this numerical approach together with the new PTF also showed better agreement with the filed measurements than benchmarked pressure heads and the model-based method with the original MVG models. The dependency of field capacity on soil texture was shown by the contour diagrams. The potential application of this approach was shown in the distribution of field capacity in China.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to acknowledge the support by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51079101) and the Ministry of Water Resources’ Special Funds for Scientific Research of China (Grant No. 201001080). The valuable comments of anonymous reviewers are also greatly appreciated.
References
Ad-hoc-AG Boden. (2005). The German soil mapping guideline (Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung-KA5), E. Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany.
Belward, A. S., Estes, J. E., and Kline, K. D. (1999). “The IGBP-DIS global 1-km land-cover data set DISCover: A project overview.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 65(9), 1013–1020.
Bittelli, M., et al. (2010). “Development and testing of a physically based, three-dimensional model of surface and subsurface hydrology.” Adv. Water Resour., 33(1), 106–122.
FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC. (2008). Harmonized world soil database (version 1.0), FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
Givi, J., Prasher, S. O., and Patel, R. M. (2004). “Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point.” Agric. Water Manage., 70(2), 83–96.
Ippisch, O., Vogel, H. J., and Bastian, P. (2006). “Validity limits for the van Genuchten-Mualem model and implications for parameter estimation and numerical simulation.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(12), 1780–1789.
Jabro, J. D., Evans, R. G., Kim, Y., and Iversen, W. M. (2009). “Estimating in situ soil-water retention and field water capacity in two contrasting soil textures.” Irrig. Sci., 27(3), 223–229.
Keshavarzi, A., Sarmadian, F., Labbafi, R., and Ahmadi, A. (2011). “Developing pedotransfer functions for estimating field capacity and permanent wilting point using fuzzy table look-up scheme.” Comput. Inf. Sci., 4(1), 130–141.
Kroes, J. G., Van Dam, J. C., Groenendijk, P., Hendriks, R. F. A., and Jacobs, C. M. J. (2008). SWAP version 3.2: Theory description and user manual, Research Institute, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Li, Q. (1983). Red soils in China, China Science Press, Beijing.
Meyer, P. D., and Gee, G. W. (1999). “Flux-based estimation of field capacity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(7), 595–599.
Minasny, B., and McBratney, A. B. (2002). “The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66(2), 352–361.
Mualem, Y. (1976). “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 513–522.
Nemes, A., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Timlin, D. J. (2011). “Toward improving global estimates of field soil water capacity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75(3), 807–812.
Nemes, A., Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and Wösten, J. H. M. (2001). “Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0.” J. Hydrol., 251(3–4), 151–162.
Ratliff, L. F., Ritchie, J. T., and Cassel, D. K. (1983). “Field-measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47(4), 770–775.
Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2001). “Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions.” J. Hydrol., 251(3–4), 163–176.
Schaap, M. G., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2005). “A modified Mualem-van Genuchten formulation for improved description of the hydraulic conductivity near saturation.” Vadose Zone J., 5(1), 27–34.
Skaggs, T. H., Arya, L. M., Shouse, P. J., and Mohanty, B. P. (2001). “Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(4), 1038–1044.
Soil-science-CAF. (1980). Soil in Northeast China, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China Science Press, Beijing.
Twarakavi, N. K. C., Sakai, M., and Simunek, J. (2009). “An objective analysis of the dynamic nature of field capacity.” Water Resour. Res., 45(10), W10410.
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980). “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44(5), 892–898.
Vereecken, H., Weynants, M., Javaux, M., Pachepsky, Y., Schaap, M. G., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2010). “Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten-Mualem soil hydraulic properties: A review.” Vadose Zone J., 9(4), 795–820.
Vogel, T., Huang, K., Zhang, R., and van Genuchten, M. T. (1996). The HYDRUS code for simulating one-dimensional water flow, solute transport, and heat movement in variably-saturated media, version 5.0, US Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA.
Vogel, T., van Genuchten, M. T., and Cislerova, M. (2000). “Effect of the shape of the soil hydraulic functions near saturation on variably-saturated flow predictions.” Adv. Water Resour., 24(2), 133–144.
Weynants, M., Vereecken, H., and Javaux, M. (2009). “Revisiting Vereecken pedotransfer functions: Introducing a closed-form hydraulic model.” Vadose Zone J., 8(1), 86–95.
Wösten, J. H. M., Lilly, A., Nemes, A., and Le Bas, C. (1999). “Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils.” Geoderma, 90(3–4), 169–185.
Wösten, J. H. M., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Rawls, W. J. (2001). “Pedotransfer functions: Bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics.” J. Hydrol., 251(3–4), 123–150.
Xinjiang Branch CAS. (1991). Soil and land resources in Xinjiang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Science Press, Beijing.
Zacharias, S., and Bohne, K. (2008). “Attempt of a flux-based evaluation of field capacity.” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 171(3), 399–408.
Zacharias, S., and Wessolek, G. (2007). “Excluding organic matter content from pedotransfer predictors of soil water retention.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71(1), 43–50.
Zhu, X. (1989). Soil and agriculture in the Loess Plateau, China Agricultural Science Press, Beijing.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 30, 2011
Accepted: May 23, 2012
Published online: May 26, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.