Assessment of Right-Tail Prediction Ability of Some Distributions by Monte Carlo Analyses
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 5
Abstract
The probability distributions of Gumbel, three-parameter lognormal (LN3), general extreme values (GEV), three-parameter gamma (G3), and three-parameter log-gamma (LG3), whose parameters are computed by the methods of moments (MOM), maximum-likelihood (ML), probability-weighted moments (PWM), and self-determined probability-weighted moments (SDPWM) are compared from the aspect of predicting the right-tail quantiles of return periods in the range: from finite-length sample series by a Monte Carlo analysis. The parameters of the LN3 distribution are also computed by the method of zero-sample-skewness. Synthetic series of 1 million elements having skewness coefficients: , , , , are generated by LN3, GEV, and G3 distributions, separately, resulting in 15 different 1 million-element synthetic series (). The right-tail quantiles having exceedance probabilities (Pex) 0.1, 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, 0.005, 0.002, 0.001, 0.0005, 0.0002, 0.0001 are first computed by the parent distribution. The right-tail quantiles having those Pexs are also computed by these 21 probability models using all short series of lengths: , 30, 50, 100, 200. Instead of biases and root mean square errors of differences of quantiles from those of the parent distribution separately for individual return periods (), (e.g., 100 years, 1,000 years), which has been the usual procedure so far, mean relative differences (s), mean absolute relative differences (s), standard deviations of relative differences (s), and standard deviations of absolute relative differences (s) of the areas between the frequency curves of the short series and the frequency curve of the parent distribution over the entire range: are proposed. Ranked tables of s, s, s, and s computed from -element series are investigated as a more comprehensive criterion of goodness of a probability distribution to predict right-tail population quantiles from short-length sample series. The G3-PWM distribution is found to be better, followed by the LN3-MOM, LN3-PWM, G3-MOM, GEV-MOM, and LN3-ML distributions for the ranges covered.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adeloye, A. J., and Montaseri, M. (2002). “Preliminary streamflow data analyses prior to water resources planning study.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 47(5), 679–692.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bobee, B., Cavadias, G., Ashkar, F., Bernier, J., and Rasmussen, P. F. (1993). “Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydrol., 142, 121–136.
Bobee, B., and Rasmussen, P. F. (1995). “Recent advances in flood frequency analysis.” Reviews of Geophysics, Supplement, US National Report to International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1991–1994, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1111–1116.
Burn, D. H. (1990). “Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach.” Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2257–2265.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cunnane, C. (1989). “Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis.”, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Deng, J., and Pandey, M. D. (2010). “Derivation of sample oriented quantile function using maximum entropy and self-determined probability weighted moments.” Environmetrics, 21, 113–132.
DMI. (2005). “Recorded annual rainfall peaks data of Turkey.” General Directorate of State Meteorological Works, Rasattepe, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Douglas, E. M., and Fairbank, C. A. (2011). “Is precipitation in northern New England becoming more extreme? Statistical analysis of extreme rainfall in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine and updated estimates of the 100-year storm.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(3), 203–217.
Dyck, S. (1976). Angewante hydrologie, Verlag fuer Bauwesen, Berlin (in German).
Ehsanzade, E., El Adlouni, S., and Bobee, B. (2010). “Frequency analysis incorporating a decision support system for hydroclimatic variables.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(11), 869–881.
EIE. (1935–2007). “Records of gauged discharges of natural streams in Turkey for the water year of ….” General Directorate of Electrical Works Planning, Eskisehir Yolu, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Haktanir, T. (1992). “Comparison of various flood frequency distributions using annual flood peaks data of rivers in Anatolia.” J. Hydrol., 136(1–4), 1–31.
Haktanir, T. (1997). “Self-determined probability-weighted moments method and its application to various distributions.” J. Hydrol., 194, 180–200.
Hosking, J. R. M., Wallis, J. R., and Wood, E. F. (1985). “Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability weighted moments.” Technometrics, 27(3), 251–261.
Hosking, J. R. M., and Wallis, J. R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis—An approach based on -moments, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Jing, D., Dedun, S., and Ronfu, Y. (1989a). “Further research on application of probability weighted moments in estimating parameters of the Pearson type three distribution.” J. Hydrol., 110, 239–257.
Jing, D., Dedun, S., and Ronfu, Y. (1989b). “Expressions relating probability weighted moments to parameters of several distributions inexpressible in inverse form.” J. Hydrol., 110, 259–270.
Kao, S. C., and Rao, A. R. (2008). “At-site based evaluation of rainfall estimates for Indiana.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(3), 184–188.
Kim, S., and Heo, J. H. (2010). “Comparison of the probability plot correlation coefficient test statistics for the general extreme value distribution.” Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010, ASCE, Reston, VA,.
Kottegoda, N. T. (1980). Stochastic water resources technology, McMillan, London.
Kuczera, G. (1982). “Robust flood frequency models.” Water Resour. Res., 18, 315–324.
Kumar, R., and Chatterjee, C. (2005). “Regional flood frequency analysis using -moments for North Brahmatputra Region of India.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(1), 1–7.
Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., and Wallis, J. R. (1980). “Quantile estimation with more or less flood-like distributions.” Water Resour. Res., 16, 547–555.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Potter, K. W. (1985). “Testing flood frequency estimation methods using a regional generation model.” Water Resour. Res., 21, 1903–1914.
Lim, Y. H. (2007). “Regional flood frequency analysis of the Red River Basin using -moments approach.” ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007: Restoring Our Natural Habitat, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Liu, D. F., Xie, B. T., and Li, H. J. (2011). “Design flood volume of the Three Gorges Dam project.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(1), 71–80.
McCuen, R. H., and Galloway, K. E. (2010). “Record length requirements for annual maximum flood series.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(9), 704–707.
Opere, A. O., Mkhandi, S., and Willems, P. (2006). “At site flood frequency analysis for the Nile equatorial basins.” Phys. Chem. Earth, 31, 919–927.
Peel, M. C., Wang, Q. J., Vogel, R., and McMahon, T. A. (2001). “The utility of -moment ratio diagrams for selecting a regional probability distribution.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 46, 147–155.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). “Numerical recipes in Fortran 77, the art of scientific computing.” Fortran Numerical Recipes, Vol. 1, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Rahman, M. M., Arya, D. S., Goel, N. K., and Dhamy, A. P. (2011). “Design flow and stage computations in the Teesta River, Bangladesh, using frequency analysis and MIKE 11 modeling.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(2), 176–186.
Rao, A. R., and Hamed, K. H. (2000). Flood frequency analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Saf, B. (2009). “Regional flood frequency analysis using -moments for the Buyuk and Kucuk Menderes River Basins of Turkey.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 14(8), 783–794.
Samuel, J., Coulibaly, P., and Metcalfe, R. (2011). “Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: Comparison of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(5), 447–459.
Sankarasubramanian, A., and Srinivasan, K. (1999). “Investigation and comparison of sampling properties of -moments and conventional moments.” J. Hydrol., 218, 13–34.
Seckin, N., Haktanir, T., and Yurtal, R. (2011). “Flood frequency analysis of Turkey using -moments method.” Hydrol. Processes, 25, 3499–3505.
Stedinger, J. R. (1980). “Fitting log normal distributions to hydrologic data.” Water Resour. Res., 26(1), 119–131.
USGS. (1982). “Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” Bulletin #17B of the Hydrology Subcommittee, Editorial Corrections March 1982, Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Office of Water Data Coordination, Reston, Virginia.
Vogel, R. M., Wilbert, O. T., and McMahon, T. A. (1993). “Flood flow frequency model selection in Southwestern United States.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 119(3), 353–366.
Whalen, T. M., Savage, G. T., and Garret, D. (2002). “The method of self-determined probability weighted moments revisited.” J. Hydrol., 268(1–4), 177–191.
Whalen, T. M., Savage, G. T., and Jeong, G. D. (2004). “An evaluation of the self-determined probability weighted moments method for estimating extreme wind speeds.” J. Hydrol., 92(3–4), 219–239.
Wilks, D. S. (1993). “Comparison of three-parameter probability distributions for representing annual extreme and partial duration precipitation series.” Water Resour. Res., 29(10), 3543–3549.
WMO. (2009). “Guide to hydrological practices, volume II: Management of water resources and application of hydrological practices.” WMO-No. 168, 6th Ed., World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yu, F. X., and Naghavi, B. (1994). “Estimating distribution parameters using optimization techniques.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 39(4), 391–403.
Zrinji, Z., and Burn, D. H. (1996). “Regional flood frequency with hierarchical region of influence.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 122(4), 245–252.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 25, 2011
Accepted: Mar 23, 2012
Published online: Mar 26, 2012
Published in print: May 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.