Technical Papers
Mar 19, 2012

Deriving Spatially Distributed Precipitation Data Using the Artificial Neural Network and Multilinear Regression Models

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

Precipitation is the primary driver for hydrologic modeling. Because hydrologic models often require long-term, spatially distributed precipitation data sets for calibration and validation, a novel approach was developed to generate spatially distributed precipitation data using an artificial neural network (ANN) for the periods when Next-Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) data are either unavailable or the quality of the NEXRAD data is not good. The multilinear regression (MLR) technique was also evaluated for completeness. The study’s focus was the Saugahatchee Creek watershed in southeast Alabama. In the study area, the wet seasons are dominated by frontal precipitations, whereas the dry seasons primarily contain patchy, convective thunderstorms. The basic approach was to train and validate the ANN and MLR models using recent NEXRAD and rain gauge precipitations, and then use the trained model with the rain gauge precipitation data to generate past, spatially distributed precipitation estimates at the NEXRAD grid locations. For the testing period, the ANN-simulated wet season precipitations in all the NEXRAD grids had a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency greater than or equal to 0.72 and a mass balance error less than or equal to 14%. The same model performance parameters were 0.65 and 17%, respectively, for the dry season. The MLR model did not perform as well as the ANN model. For the MLR model, the wet season mass balance error ranged from 13–48%, whereas the dry season mass balance error ranged from 0.1–36% on the testing data set. An uncalibrated soil and water assessment tool model was used to assess the improvements in stream flow simulations with the ANN-simulated spatially distributed precipitation data. The stream flow simulations using ANN-generated, spatially distributed precipitations were closer to the observed stream flows relative to stream flows generated using the rain gauge precipitations. Overall, the results suggest that the method developed in this study can be used to generate past, spatially distributed precipitations at NEXRAD grid locations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Amiri, B. J., and Nakane, K. (2009). “Comparative prediction of stream water total nitrogen from land cover using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression approaches.” Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 18(2), 151–160.
ASCE. (2000a). “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: Preliminary concepts.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 115–123.
ASCE. (2000b). “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(2), 124–137.
Azpurua, M., and Ramos, K. D. (2010). “A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnetic field magnitude.” Prog. Electromagn. Res., 14(1), 135–145.
Baeck, M. L., and Smith, J. A. (1998). “Rainfall estimation by the WSR-88D for heavy rainfall events.” Weather Forecast., 13(2), 416–436.
Bedient, P. B., Hoblit, B. C., Gladwell, D. C., and Vieux, B. E. (2000). “Nexrad radar for flood prediction in Houston.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 5(3), 269–277.
Bowden, G. J., Dandy, G. C., and Maier, H. R. (2005). “Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—Background and methodology.” J. Hyrdol., 301(1–4), 75–92.
Chakraborty, K., Mehorotra, K., Mohan, C. K., and Ranka, S. (1992). “Forecasting the behavior of multivariate time series using neural networks.” Neural Networks, 5(6), 961–970.
DEM. (2010). “Digital elevation model.” 〈http://www.seamless.usgs.gov〉 (Jan. 10, 2010).
Di Luzio, M., and Arnold, J. G. (2004). “Formulation of a hybrid calibration approach for a physically based distributed model with NEXRAD data input.” J. Hydrol., 298(1–4), 136–154.
Ellouze, M., Azri, C., and Abida, H. (2009). “Spatial variability of monthly and annual rainfall data over southern Tunisia.” Atmos. Res., 93(4), 832–839.
French, M. N., Krajewski, W. F., and Cuykendall, R. R. (1992). “Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 137(1–4), 1–31.
Fulton, R. A. (2002). “Activities to improve WSR-88D radar rainfall estimation in the National Weather Service.” Proc., 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conf., Advisory Committee on Water Information, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1–15.
Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach, J. P., Seo, D. J., Miller, D. A., and O’Bannon, T. (1998). “The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm.” Weather Forecast., 13(2), 377–395.
Goudenhoofdt, E., and Delobbe, L. (2009). “Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(2), 195–203.
Govindaraju, R. S., and Rao, A. R. (2000). Artificial neural networks in hydrology, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Grecu, M., and Krajewski, W. F. (2000). “Simulation study of the effects of model uncertainty in variational assimilation of radar data on rainfall forecasting.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 239(1–4), 85–96.
Gupta, H. V., Hsu, K., and Sorooshian, S. (2000). “Effective and efficient modeling for streamflow forecasting.” Artificial neural networks in hydrology, R. S. Govindaraju and A. Ramachandra, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 7–22.
Haan, C. T. (1977). Statistical methods in hydrology, Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.
Harun, S., Kassim, A. H. M., and Nor, A. N. I. (2002). “Rainfall-runoff model using artificial neural network.” Proc., World Engineering Congress, Federation of Engineering Institutions of Islamic Countries, Selangor, Malaysia, 19–23.
Hinton, G. E. (1992). “How neural networks learn from experience.” Sci. Am., 267(3), 145–151.
Houze, R. A. Jr. (1997). “Stratiform precipitation in regions of convection: A meteorological paradox.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78(10), 2179–2196.
Jain, S. K., and Sudheer, K. P. (2008). “Fitting of hydrologic models: A closer look at the Nash-Sutcliffe index.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(10), 981–986.
Jatho, N., Pluntke, T., Kurbjuhn, C., and Bernhofer, C. (2010). “An approach to combine radar and gauge based rainfall data under consideration of their qualities in low mountain ranges of Saxony.” Nat. Haz. Earth Syst. Sci., 10(3), 429–446.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J. G. (2004). “Comparison of rain gauge and WSR-88D stage III precipitation data over the Texas-Gulf basin.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 292(1–4), 135–152.
Jayakrishnan, R., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., and Arnold, J. G. (2005). “Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management.” Hydrol. Proc., 19(3), 749–762.
Johnson, L. E., and Olsen, B. G. (1998). “Assessment of quantitative precipitation forecasts.” Weather Forecast., 13(1), 75–83.
Kalin, L., and Hantush, M. M. (2006). “Hydrologic modeling of an eastern Pennsylvania watershed with NEXRAD and rain gauge data.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11(6), 555–569.
Kalin, L., Isik, S., Schoonover, J. E., and Lockaby, B. G. (2010). “Predicting water quality in unmonitored watersheds using artificial neural networks.” J. Environ. Qual., 39(4), 1429–1440.
Kisi, O. (2007). “Stream flow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(5), 532–539.
Kohonen, T. (1997). Self-organizing maps, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Krajewski, W. F., and Smith, J. A. (2002). “Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation.” Adv. Water Resour., 25(8–12), 1387–1394.
Lallahem, S., and Mania, J. (2003). “A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using neural network technique: Example in fractured porous media.” Math. Comput. Model., 37(9–10), 1047–1061.
Legates, D. R. (2000). “Real-time calibration of radar precipitation estimates.” Prof. Geogr., 52(2), 235–246.
Marchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., and Gaume, E. (2010). “Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 394(1–2), 118–133.
Moon, J., Srinivasan, R., and Jacobs, J. H. (2004). “Stream flow estimation using spatially distributed rainfall in the trinity river basin, Texas.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agr. Biol. Eng., 47(5), 1445–1451.
Morin, E., Goodrich, D. C., Maddox, R. A., Gao, X., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (2006). “Spatial patterns in thunderstorm rainfall events and their coupling with watershed hydrological response.” Adv. Water Resour., 29(6), 843–860.
Naoum, S., and Tsanis, I. K. (2004). “Ranking spatial interpolation techniques using a GIS-based DSS.” Global NEST: Int. J., 6(1), 1–20.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 10(3), 282–290.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). (2012). “Land-based station data.” 〈http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/radar/jnx〉 (Nov. 10, 2012).
National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). (2010). “National land cover data set.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd-2001.html〉 (Jan. 5, 2010).
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2005). “Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation. Version 2005.”, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX.
Partal, T., and Cigizoglu, H. K. (2009). “Prediction of daily precipitation using wavelet neural networks.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 54(2), 234–246.
Qi, M., and Zhang, G. P. (2001). “An investigation of model selection criteria for neural network time series forecasting.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 132(3), 666–680.
Raghuwanshi, N. S., Singh, R., and Reddy, L. S. (2006). “Runoff and sediment yield modeling using artificial neural networks: Upper Siwane River, India.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 11(1), 71–79.
Ren, L., and Zhao, M. Z. (2002). “An optimal neural network and concrete strength modeling.” Adv. Eng. Softw., 33(3), 117–130.
Sauvageot, H. (1994). “Rainfall measurement by radar: A review.” Atmos. Res., 35(1), 27–54.
Seo, D. J. (1998). “Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gage data.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 208(1–2), 37–52.
Seo, D. J., Breidenbach, J. P., and Johnson, E. R. (1999). “Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 223(3–4), 131–147.
Smith, J. A., Seo, D. J., Baeck, M. L., and Hudlow, M. D. (1996). “An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2035–2045.
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO). (2010). “Soil survey geographic database.” 〈soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov〉 (Jan 5, 2010).
Southeast River Forecast Center (SERFC). (2012). “Nexrad data.” 〈http://dipper.nws.noaa.gov/hdsb/data/nexrad/serfc_mpe.php〉 (Nov. 10, 2012).
Srivastava, P., McNair, J. N., and Johnson, T. E. (2006). “Comparison of process-based and artificial neural network approaches for streamflow modeling in agricultural watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(3), 545–563.
Starks, P. J., and Moriasi, D. N. (2009). “Spatial resolution effect of precipitation data on SWAT calibration and performance: Implications for CEAP.” Trans. Am. Soc. Agr. Biol. Eng., 52(4), 1171–1180.
Tao, T., Chocat, B., Liu, S., and Xin, K. (2009). “Uncertainty analysis of interpolation methods in rainfall spatial distribution—A case of small catchment in Lyon.” J. Water Resour. Prot., 1(2), 136–144.
Tobin, K. J., and Bennett, M. E. (2009). “Using SWAT to model stream flow in two river basins with ground and satellite precipitation data.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(1), 253–271.
Trichakis, I. C., Nikolos, I. K., and Karatzas, G. P. (2009). “Optimal selection of artificial neural network parameters for the prediction of a karstic aquifer’s response.” Hydrol. Process., 23(20), 2956–2969.
Valverde-Ramirez, M. C., Ferreira, N. J., and Campos-Velho, H. F. (2006). “Linear and nonlinear statistical downscaling for rainfall forecasting over southeastern Brazil.” Weather Forecast., 21(6), 969–989.
Velasco-Forero, C. A., Sempere-Torres, D., Cassiraga, E. F., and Gomez-Hernandez, J. J. (2009). “A non-parametric automatic blending methodology to estimate rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data.” Adv. Water Resour., 32(7), 986–1002.
Waleed, A. R. M., Amin, M., Halim, G. A., Shariff, A. R. M., and Aimrun, W. (2009). “Calibrated radar-derived rainfall data for rainfall-runoff modeling.” Eur. J. Sci. Res., 30(4), 608–619.
Wang, X., Xie, H., Sharif, H., and Zeitler, J. (2008). “Validating NEXRAD MPE and stage III precipitation products for uniform rainfall on the Upper Gudalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country.” J. Hydrol., 348(1–2), 73–86.
Westrick, K. J., Mass, C. F., and Colle, B. A. (1999). “The limitations of the WSR-88D radar network for quantitative precipitation measurement over the coastal western United States.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80(11), 2289–2298.
Willmott, C. J. (1982). “Some comments on the evaluation of model performance.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 63(11), 1309–1313.
Winchell, M., Srinivasan, R., Di Luzio, M., and Arnold, J. (2008). “ArcSWAT interface for SWAT 2005. User’s guide.”, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX.
Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., and Fan, C. (2010). “Prediction of rainfall time series using modular artificial neural networks coupled with data-preprocessing techniques.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 389(1–2), 146–167.
Xie, H., et al. (2006). “Comparison of NEXRAD stage III and gauge precipitation estimates over a semiarid region.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(1), 237–256.
Xie, H., Zhou, X., Vivoni, E. R., Hendrickx, J. M. H., and Small, E. E. (2005). “GIS-based NEXRAD stage III precipitation database: Automated approaches for data processing and visualization.” Comput. Geosci., 31(1), 65–76.
Young, C. B., Nelson, B. R., Bradley, A. A., Krajewski, W. F., Kruger, A., and Morrissey, M. L. (2000). “An evaluation study of NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol., 1(3), 241–254.
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Y., and Liao, H. (2008). “Design of ensemble neural network using the Akaike information criterion.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 21(8), 1182–1188.
Zoccatelli, D., Borga, M., Zanon, F., Antonescu, B., and Stancalie, G. (2010). “Which rainfall spatial information for flash flood response modelling? A numerical investigation based on data from the Carpathian Range, Romania.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 394(1–2), 148–161.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 194 - 205

History

Received: Jan 26, 2011
Accepted: Mar 15, 2012
Published online: Mar 19, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Suresh Sharma
Ph.D. Student, Biosystems Engineering Dept., Tom E. Corley Building, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849.
Sabahattin Isik
M.ASCE
Postdoctorate, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Forestry and Wildlife Building, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849.
Puneet Srivastava [email protected]
Associate Professor, Biosystems Engineering Dept., Tom E. Corley Building, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Latif Kalin
M.ASCE
Associate Professor, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Forestry and Wildlife Building, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share