Application of Bayesian Model Averaging Approach to Multimodel Ensemble Hydrologic Forecasting
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 11
Abstract
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a statistical method that can synthesize the advantages of different models or methods. The objective of this research is to explore the use of BMA to forecast combinations among several hydrological models. BMA is a statistical scheme that infers the posterior distribution of forecasting variables by weighing individual posterior distributions based on their probabilistic likelihood measures, with the better performing predictions receiving higher weights than the worse predictions. The Topographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration and Xin’anjiang models were applied to the Dongwan basin, Yellow River, China, for flood simulation. Observed and simulated discharge time series were transformed into normally distributed variables through the normal quantile transform. The Gaussian mixture model was constructed by weighing the posterior distribution of individual hydrological models in the transformed space. The posterior probability measuring samples belonging to each specific hydrological model were treated as the weights. The parameters of the Gaussian mixture model and the weight of each hydrological model were estimated by the expectation maximization algorithm. Thus, the forecast combination in the catchment was obtained from the two hydrological models. For flood forecasting, the results provided not only the mean discharge values, but also quantitative evaluation of forecasting uncertainties (e.g., standard deviation and confidence interval), because the BMA approach calculated the estimation of the probability distribution of forecasted variables.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” Program) (Grant No. 2010CB951102), and by Program for Yangtze River Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) of China (Grant IRT0717), and by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51079039; 51179046). We are also grateful to three referees for their extremely helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.
References
Abbott, M. B., and Bathurst, J. C. (1986). “An introduction to the European hydrological system—System Hydrologique European, “SHE” 1: History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modeling system.” J. Hydrol., 87(1–2), 45–49.
Ajami, N. K., Duan, Q. Y., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 43(1), W01403.
Beven, K. J. (1989). “Changing ideas in hydrology—The case of physically based models.” J. Hydrol., 105(1–2), 157–172.
Bilmes, J. A. (1998). “A gentle tutorial of the EM algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models.” Technical Rep., Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 1–13.
Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A. (1973). “A generalized streamflow system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers.” Joint Federal State River Forecasts Centre, Sacramento, CA.
Crowford, N. H., and Linsley, R. K. (1966). “Digital simulation in hydrology: Standford watershed model IV.”, Dept. Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 210.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B, 39(1), 1–38.
Dickinson, J. P. (1975). “Some comments on the combination of forecasts.” Oper. Res. Q., 26(1), 205–210.
Duan, Q. Y., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S. (2007). “Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(5), 1371–1386.
Hoeting, J. A., Raftery, M. D., and Volinsky, A. E. (1999). “Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial.” Stat. Sci., 14(4), 382–401.
Hosking, J. R. M. (1990). “L-moments: Analysis and estimation of distribution using linear combinations of order statistics.” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B, 52(1), 105–124.
Huang, Z. P. (2003). Hydrologic statistics, Hohai University Press, Nanjing, China, 234–236.
Kelly, K. S., and Krzysztofowicz, R. (1994). “Probability distributions for flood warning systems.” Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1145–1152.
Madigan, D., and Raftery, A. E. (1994). “Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam’s window.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89(428), 1535–1546.
Makridakis, S., et al. (1982). “The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition.” J. Forecasting, 1(2), 111–153.
Makridakis, S., and Winkler, R. L. (1983). “Average of forecasts: Some empirical results.” Manage. Sci., 29(9), 987–996.
Neuman, S. P., and Wierenga, P. J. (2003). “A comprehensive strategy of hydrologic modeling and uncertainty analysis for nuclear facilities and sites.”, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). “Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion).” Sociological methodology, P. V. Marsden, ed., Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA, 111–196.
Raftery, A. E., Balabdaoui, F., Gneiting, T., and Polakowski, M. (2003). “Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.” Technical Rep. 440, Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Raftery, A. E., Geneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., and Polakowski, M. (2005). “Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles.” Mon. Weather Rev., 133(5), 1155–1174.
Rubin, D. B., and Schenker, N. (1986). “Efficiently simulating the coverage properties of interval estimates.” J. Royal Statis. Soci.: Seri. C, 35(2), 159–167.
See, L., and Abrahart, R. J. (2001). “Multi-model data fusion for hydrological forecasting.” Comput. Geosci., 27(8), 987–994.
Shamseldin, A. Y., O’Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C. (1997). “Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models.” J. Hydrol., 197(1–4), 203–229.
Sherman, L. K. (1932). “Streamflow from rainfall by the unit hydrograph method.” Eng. N. Rec., 108, 501–505.
Sugawara, M., et al. (1974). “Tank model and its application to Bird Creek, Wollombi Brook, Bikin River, Kitsu River, Sanga River and Nam Mune.” Research Note, Vol. 11, National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, Ibaraki, Japan, 1–64.
Thomthwaite, C. W., and Mather, J. R. (1995). The water balance, Laboratory of Climatology, Centerton, NJ, 86.
Todini, E. (1995). “New trends in modeling soil processes from hill-slope to GCMS Scales.” The role of water and the hydrological cycle in global change: NATO ASI Series I—Global environmental change, H. R. Oliver and S. A. Oliver, eds., Vol. 31, 317–347.
Xiong, L., Shamseldin, A. Y., and O’Connor, K. M. (2001). “A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system.” J. Hydrol., 245(1–4), 196–217.
Zhao, R. J. (1992). “The Xin’anjiang model applied in China.” J. Hydrol., 135(1–4), 371–381.
Zhao, R. J., Zhang, Y. L., Fang, L. R., Liu, X. R., and Zhang, Q. S. (1980). “The Xinanjiang model.” Hydrological Forecasting Proceedings Oxford Symposium, IAHS publication no. 129, 351–356.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 6, 2010
Accepted: Aug 15, 2011
Published online: Aug 18, 2011
Discussion open until: Jan 18, 2012
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.