TECHNICAL NOTES
Jun 14, 2011

Modeling Hydrologic Processes and NPS Pollution in a Small Watershed in Subhumid Subtropics Using SWAT

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 3

Abstract

The soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) has been calibrated and validated to predict stream flow, and to transport sediment and non-point source (NPS) pollutants to the downstream water resources from a small (1,695 ha) watershed in sub-humid subtropics that receives variable monsoon rains. Observed rainfall, temperature, stream flow, and sediment yield data for three years have been utilized to test the model's prediction capability for daily stream flow and sediment yield during the monsoon months from June to October. Because of the variability of monsoon rains, the model has been calibrated for a normal rainfall year (M-SD<RF<M+SD and RF=1.2*M) and then validated for a relatively dry (RF<M-SD) and a medium rainfall year (RF>M-SD and RF<0.8M). The results reveal that a calibrated model for a normal rainfall year can be used successfully for predicting hydrologic processes and NPS pollution for a relatively dry rainfall year. However, for the medium rainfall year the model prediction shows more deviations from the measured values. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies in dry and medium rainfall years are 0.70 and 0.62 for daily stream flow and 0.73 and 0.69 for daily sediment yield. NPS pollutants simulation results indicate that a calibrated SWAT model is used in estimating hydrologic responses related to water quality problems of watersheds situated in monsoon regions in which the nature of rainfall shows varying characteristics every year. The results of the study have implications for watershed management to reduce the sediment and NPS pollutants load into downstream water bodies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). “Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 300.
Arnold, J. G., and Allen, P. M. (1996). “Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 176(1-4), 57–77.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., Allen, P. M., and Walker, C. (1999). “Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 35(5), 1037–1052.
Arnold, G. J., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Behera, S., and Panda, R. K. (2006). “Evaluation of management alternatives for an agricultural watershed in a sub-humid subtropical region using a physical process model.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 113(1–4), 62–72.
Bingner, R. L., Murphee, C. E., and Mutchler, C. K. (1989). “Comparison of sediment yield models on watershed in Mississippi.” Trans. ASABE, 32(2), 529–534.
Dhar, S., and Mazumdar, A. (2009). “Hydrological modelling of the Kangsabati river under changed climate scenario: case study in India.” Hydrol. Processes, 23(16), 2394–2406.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G. (2007). “The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions.” Trans. ASABE, 50(4), 1211–1250.
Gosain, A. K., Rao, S., and Basuray, D. (2006). “Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins.” Curr. Sci., 90(3), 346–353.
Kashyap, P. S., and Panda, R. K. (2001). “Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region.” Agric. Water Manage., 50(1), 9–25.
Kim, S. H., and Delleur, J. W. (2001). “Stochastic structures between quantity and quality responses of rainfall-runoff at an upland agricultural watershed.” Water Sci. Technol., 44(7), 91–104.
Kusre, B. C., Baruah, D. C., Bordoloi, P. K., and Patra, S. C. (2010). “Assesment of hydropower potential using GIS and hydrological modeling technique in Kopili River basin in Assam (India).” Appl. Energy, 87(1), 298–309.
Mandal, U. K., et al. (2005). “Soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield from a shallow soil with varied stone cover and intensity of rain.” Eur. J. Soil Sci., 56(4), 435–443.
Mishra, A., Froebrich, J., and Gassman, P. W. (2007). “Evaluation of the SWAT model for assessing sediment control structures in a small watershed in India.” Trans. ASABE, 50(2), 469–477.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-1 : A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., J. R. Kiniry, Williams, J. R., and King, K. W. (2002). “Soil and water assessment tool: theoretical documentation (version 2000).” 〈http://swatmodel.tamu.edu/media/1290/swat2000theory.pdf〉 (2004–2004).
Rosenthal, W. D., Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J. G. (1995). “Alternative river management using a linked GIS-hydrology model.” Trans. ASABE, 38(3), 783–790.
Saleh, A., et al. (2000). “Application of SWAT for the Upper North Bosque River watershed.” Trans. ASABE, 43(5), 1077–1087.
Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Hauck, L. M., and Dugas, W. A. (2001). “Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and nonpoint source pollution.” Trans. ASABE, 44(6), 1559–1570.
Sloan, P. G., and Moore, I. D. (1984). “Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds.” Water Resour. Res., 20(12), 1815–1822.
Srinivasan, M. S., Hamlett, J. M., Day, R. L., Sams, J. I., and Petersen, G. W. (1998). “Hydrologic modeling of two glaciated watersheds in Northeast Pennsylvania.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(4), 963–972.
USDA Soil Conservation Service. (1972). “Section 4: Hydrology.” In: National Engineering Handbook, Washington, D.C.
Williams, J. R., and Berndt, H. D. (1977). “Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology.” Trans. ASABE, 20(6), 1100–1104.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17Issue 3March 2012
Pages: 445 - 454

History

Received: Aug 10, 2009
Accepted: Jun 10, 2011
Published online: Jun 14, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ashok Mishra [email protected]
Agricultural and Food Engineering Dept., Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, Kharagpur (W.B.)-721302, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
S. Kar
Agricultural and Food Engineering Dept., Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, Kharagpur (W.B.)-721302, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share