Relative Importance of the Different Rainfall Statistics in the Calibration of Stochastic Rainfall Generation Models
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 3
Abstract
Stochastic rainfall generators are used in hydrologic analysis because they can provide precipitation input to models whenever data are not available, and their parameters are calculated so that the long-term statistics of the synthetic rainfall time series match those of the rainfall records. However, although mentioned in the literature, the relative importance of each rainfall statistic on the watershed response has not been addressed yet, and no guidance on how to account for it has been provided. In this paper, this relative importance is estimated and used to ponder each statistic differently in the calibration of rainfall generators so that it better reflects the watershed hydrology. Rainfall records of 1,249 rain gauges throughout the contiguous United States were used in the study. It was found that when synthetic rainfall time series are generated by weighting the precipitation statistics according to their relative importance, predicted runoff depths and peak flows are underestimated by 4 and 3%, respectively, whereas when they are generated by giving the same weight to all statistics, the underestimation is by 20 and 14%, respectively. These results, based on a significant number of rain gauges, confirm the benefit of weighing the statistics differently for watershed analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Burton, A., Kilsby, C. G., Fowler, H. J., Cowpertwait, P. S. P., and O’Connell, P. E. (2008). “RainSim: A spatial-temporal stochastic rainfall modelling system.” Environ. Modell. Software, 23(12), 1356–1369.
Calenda, G., and Napolitano, F. (1999). “Parameter estimation of Neyman-Scott processes for temporal point rainfall simulation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 225(1–2), 45–66.
Chandler, R. E. (1997). “A spectral method for estimating parameters in rainfall models.” Bernoulli, 3(3), 301–322.
Chatterjee, S., and Hadi, A. S. (2006). Regression analysis by example, 4th Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P. (1995). “A generalized spatial-temporal model of rainfall based on a clustered point process.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 450(1938), 163–175.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P., Isham, V., and Onof, C. (2007). “Point process models of rainfall: Developments for fine-scale structure.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 463(2086), 2569–2587.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P., and O’Connell, P. E. (1997). “A regionalised Neyman-Scott model of rainfall with convective and stratiform cells.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1(1), 71–80.
Cowpertwait, P. S. P., O’Connell, P. E., Metcalfe, A. V., and Mawdsley, J. A. (1996). “Stochastic point process modelling of rainfall. I. Single-site fitting and validation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 175(1–4), 17–46.
Favre, A. C., Musy, A., and Morgenthaler, S. (2004). “Unbiased parameter estimation of the Neyman-Scott model for rainfall simulation with related confidence interval.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 286(1–4), 168–178.
Gabellani, S., Boni, G., Ferraris, L., von Hardenberg, J., and Provenzale, A. (2007). “Propagation of uncertainty from rainfall to runoff: A case study with a stochastic rainfall generator.” Adv. Water Resour., 30(10), 2061–2071.
Green, W. H., and Ampt, G. A. (1911). “Studies on soil physics part I—The flow of air and water through soils.” J. Agric. Sci., 4(01), 1–24.
Gyasi-Agyei, Y. (1999). “Identification of regional parameters of a stochastic model for rainfall disaggregation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 223(3–4), 148–163.
Hawk, K., and Eagleson, P. S. (1992). “Climatology of station storm rainfall in the continental United States: Parameters of the Bartlett Lewis and Poisson rectangular pulses models.” Rep. No. 336, Ralph M. Parsons Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Hoerl, A. E., and Kennard, R. W. (1970). “Ridge regession—Applications to nonorthogonal problems.” Technometrics, 12(1), 69–82.
Isham, S., Entekhabi, D., and Bras, R. L. (1990). “Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis for the modified Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulses model of rainfall.” J. Geophys. Res., 95(D3), 2093–2100.
James, W. P., Warinner, J., and Reedy, M. (1992). “Application of the Green-Ampt infiltration equation to watershed modeling.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(3), 623–635.
Khaliq, M., and Cunnane, C. (1996). “Modelling point rainfall occurrences with the modified Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulses model.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 180(1-4), 109–138.
Marani, M., Grossi, G., Napolitano, F., and Wallace, M. (1997). “Forcing, intermittency, and land surface hydrologic partitioning.” Water Resour. Res., 33(1), 167–175.
Michel, C., Andreassian, V., and Perrin, C. (2005). “Soil conservation service curve number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure?” Water Resour. Res., 41(2), W02011.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). (2010). Online climate data directory. 〈http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/climatedata.html#hourly〉 (Oct. 28, 2010).
Nearing, M. A., Liu, B. Y., Risse, L. M., and Zhang, X. (1996). “Curve numbers and Green-Ampt effective hydraulic conductivities.” Water Resour. Bull., 32(1), 125–136.
Olsson, J., and Burlando, P. (2002). “Reproduction of temporal scaling by a rectangular pulses rainfall model.” Hydrol. Processes, 16(3), 611–630.
Onof, C., Chandler, R. E., Kakou, A., Northrop, P., Wheater, H. S., and Isham, V. (2000). “Rainfall modelling using Poisson-cluster processes: A review of developments.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 14(6), 384–411.
Onof, C., and Wheater, H. S. (1994). “Improvements to the modeling of British rainfall using a modified random parameter Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulse model.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 157(1–4), 177–195.
Pearson, K. (1901). “On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space.” Philos. Mag., 2(11), 559–572.
Ponce, V. M., and Hawkins, R. H. (1996). “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng., 1(1), 11–19.
Richards, L. A. (1931). “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” J. Appl. Phys., 1(5), 318–333.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1987). “Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 410(1839), 269–288.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1988). “A point process model for rainfall: Further developments.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 417(1853), 283–298.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1972). National engineering handbook—Section 4—Hydrology, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Vanmullem, J. A. (1991). “Runoff and peak discharges using Green-Ampt infiltration-model.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 117(3), 354–370.
van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y. (2008). “Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 35(11), L11403.
Verhoest, N., Troch, P. A., and De Troch, F. P. (1997). “On the applicability of Bartlett-Lewis rectangular pulses models in the modeling of design storms at a point.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 202(1–4), 108–120.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17 • Issue 3 • March 2012
Pages: 368 - 376
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 11, 2010
Accepted: Jun 7, 2011
Published online: Jun 10, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.