Assessment of Water Quality Sampling Sites by a Dynamic Programming Approach
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17, Issue 2
Abstract
Water quality monitoring network design is an iterative procedure, where an existing network should be reassessed from time to time on the basis of changing environmental demands and objectives in water quality management. In recent years, the economic and financial constraints faced by monitoring agencies have led to the initiation of network reduction procedures in the space domain (i.e., the reduction of the number of stations within a network). In this regard, the dynamic programming approach (DPA) can be effectively used to determine which monitoring sites are to be preserved when the network is consolidated for a fixed number of stations. However, previous studies on the use of the DPA methodology in network redesign have not yet resolved two basic questions: (1) what is the required (optimum) number of stations to be retained in the network to best represent the basin? and (2) how many subbasins should be selected when segregating the basin into smaller units as foreseen by DPA? Accordingly, the primary objective of this paper is to modify the DPA approach to determine the optimum number of stations to be retained when consolidating a monitoring network. In previous studies, the selection of subbasins in DPA was realized basically by subjective approaches based on general experiences of the designers so that the secondary objective of the study is to expand the capabilities of DPA by utilizing a more systematic approach to subbasin identification. The previously mentioned modifications to the DPA methodology are demonstrated in the case of a water quality monitoring network in Gediz River basin along the Aegean coast of Turkey. The results obtained indicate that DPA can also be an effective tool in optimizing the number of stations to be retained in a monitoring network.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council (TUBITAK) through two project grants (projects coded UNSPECIFIEDYDABCAG 489 and UNSPECIFIEDYDABAG 100Y1002). This support is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Belton, V., and Stewart, J. S. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, Kluwer, UK.
Cetinkaya, C. P. (2007). “Spatial optimization of hydrologic monitoring networks on rivers.” Ph.D. thesis, Dokuz Eylul Univ. Graduate Institute of Applied Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H., and Willis, R. J. (2000). “Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights.” Comput. Oper. Res., 27(10), 963–973.
Harmancioglu, N. B., et al. (1999a). “Efficiency analysis and network optimization in DSI’s water quality monitoring networks.” Rep. prepared for the research project granted by TUBITAK, Project code: YDABCAG 489, Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, Izmir, Turkey (in Turkish).
Harmancioglu, N. B. et al. (2003). “Efficiency analysis and network optimization in DSI’s water quality monitoring networks II.” Rep. prepared for the research project granted by TUBITAK, Project code: YDABAG 100Y1002, Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, Izmir, Turkey (in Turkish).
Harmancioglu, N., Alpaslan, N., Alkan, A., Ozkul, S., Mazlum, S., and Fistikoglu, O. (1994). “Design and evaluation of water quality monitoring networks for environmental management.” Rep. prepared for the research project granted by TUBITAK, Project code: DEBAG-23, Scientific and Technical Council of Turkey, Izmir, Turkey, 514 (in Turkish).
Harmancioglu, N. B., Alpaslan, N., and Singh, V. P. (1992). “Design of water quality monitoring networks.” Geomechanics and water engineering environmental management, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 267–296.
Harmancioglu, N. B., Fistikoglu, O., Ozkul, S. D., Singh, V. P., and Alpaslan, N. (1999b). Water quality monitoring network design, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Harmancioglu, N. B., Icaga, Y., and Gul, A. (2004). “The use of an optimization method in assessment of water quality sampling sites.” EWRA Eur. Water, 5/6, 25–34.
Harmancioglu, N. B., and Singh, V. P. (2002). “Data accuracy and data validation.” Theme 11 on “Environmental and Ecological Sciences and Resources,” Chapter 11.5 on ”Environmental Systems,” Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), Knowledge for sustainable development, Vol. II, A. Sydow, ed., UNESCO Publishing-Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK, 781–798.
Horton, R. E. (1945). “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 56, 275–370.
Icaga, Y. (1998). “Spatial optimization of hydrometric data networks by systems analysis techniques.” Ph.D. thesis, Dokuz Eylul Univ. Graduate Institute of Applied Sciences, Izmir, Turkey.
Icaga, Y. (2005). “Genetic algorithm usage in water quality monitoring networks optimization in Gediz (Turkey) River Basin.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 108(1–3), 261–277.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Anderson, D. E., and Brenner, R. N. (1984). “Consolidation of a stream quality monitoring network.” Water Resour. Bull., 20(4), 473–481.
Loftis, J. C., McBride, G. B., and Ellis, J. C. (1991). “Considerations of scale in water quality monitoring and data analysis.” Water Resour. Bull., 27(2), 255–264.
Moss, M. E. (1989). “Water quality data in the information age.” Proc., Int. Symp. on the Design of Water Quality Information Systems, Information Series, No. 61, R. C. Ward, J. C. Loftis and G. B. McBride, eds., CSU, Fort Collins, CO, 8–15.
Ozkul, S., Cetinkaya, C. P., and Harmancioglu, N. (2003). “Design of the water quality network in the Gediz Basin using drainage and effluent discharge characteristics.” Proc., 1st National Water Engineering Symp., State Hydraulic Works (DSI) Publications, Ankara, Turkey, 215–227 (in Turkish).
Sanders, T. G., Ward, R. C., Loftis, J. C., Steele, T. D., Adrian, D. D., and Yevjevich, V. (1983). Design of networks for monitoring water quality, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO.
Sharp, W. E. (1970). “Stream order as a measure of sample uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 6(3), 919–926.
Sharp, W. E. (1971). “A topologically optimum water—Sampling plan for rivers and streams.” Water Resour. Res., 7(6), 1641–1646.
Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y. D. P., and Faria, A. S. (2004). “An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios.” Water Resour. Manage., 18(1), 35–54.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study, P. Parlos, ed., Kluwer, Dordrect, Netherlands.
Ward, R. C., and Loftis, J. C. (1986). “Establishing statistical design criteria for water quality monitoring systems: Review and synthesis.” Water Resour. Bull., 22(5), 759–767.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 17 • Issue 2 • February 2012
Pages: 305 - 317
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 2010
Accepted: Apr 26, 2011
Published online: Jun 10, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.