Assessing the Need for Downscaling RCM Data for Hydrologic Impact Study
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 6
Abstract
Climate change impact studies have generally downscaled large-scale global climate model (GCM) output data; however, few studies have considered downscaling regional climate model (RCM) data. It is unclear whether further downscaling raw RCM data could be beneficial or not in a hydrologic impact study. This study provides some experimental results to address that question. Raw Canadian regional climate model (CRCM4.2) data are downscaled by using a common statistical downscaling method (SDSM) and a data-driven technique called a time-lagged feedforward network (TLFN). Regardless of the downscaling methods and the predictands (e.g., precipitation, temperature), the downscaled CRCM4.2 data are found to be much closer to the observed data than the raw CRCM4.2 data. When the downscaled CRCM4.2 data are used in a hydrologic model (HBV), the model’s ability to accurately simulate streamflow and reservoir inflow is significantly improved as compared to the use of the raw CRCM4.2 data. Simulations of future river flow and reservoir inflow reveal that the general patterns of changes in future flow are quite similar whether downscaled or raw CRCM4.2 data are used. However, the use of downscaled CRCM4.2 data seems to provide more consistent predictions of the magnitude and timing of changes. It appears that the RCM may still suffer from the bias problem inherent to the parent GCM. Further downscaling raw RCM data permits bias correction, improves hydrologic modeling, and provides more consistent changes (magnitude and timing) of future flows.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was made possible through a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERCNSERC) of Canada. The authors would like to thank the Aluminum Co. of Canada (now Alcoa) and Environment Canada for providing the experiment data. The SMHI-HBV has kindly been made available by the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute. The authors are grateful to the associate editor and three anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped to improve the manuscript.
References
Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., and Bobee, B. (2001). “Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(5), 367–376.
Coulibaly, P., and Dibike, Y. B. (2004). “Downscaling global climate model outputs for flood frequency analysis in the Saguenay River system.” Research Rep. Project No. S02-15-01, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Coulibaly, P., Dibike, Y. B., and Anctil, F. (2005). “Downscaling precipitation and temperature with temporal neural networks.” J. Hydrometeorol., 6(4), 483–496.
Dibike, Y. B., and Coulibaly, P. (2005). “Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: Comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 307(1–4), 145–163.
Dibike, Y. B., and Coulibaly, P. (2007). “Validation of hydrologic models for climate scenario simulation: The case of Saguenay watershed in Quebec.” Hydrol. Processes, 21(23), 3123–3135.
Graham, L. P., Hagemann, S., Jaun, S., and Beniston, M. (2007). “On interpreting hydrological changes from regional climate models.” Clim. Change, 81, 97–122.
Hay, L. E., and Clark, M. P. (2003). “Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 282(1–4), 56–75.
Haylock, M. R., Cawley, G. C., Harpham, C., Wilby, R. L., and Goodess, C. M. (2006). “Downscaling heavy precipitation over the United Kingdom: A comparison of dynamical and statistical methods and their future scenarios.” Int. J. Climatol., 26(10), 1397–1415.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). “Climate change 2007: Synthesis report.” Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, and A. Reisinger, eds., Geneva.
Liden, R., and Harlin, J. (2000). “Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 238(3–4), 231–247.
Music, B., and Caya, D. (2007). “Evaluation of the hydrological cycle over the Mississippi River basin as simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM).” J. Hydrometeorol., 8(5), 969–988.
Wilby, R. L., and Dawson, C. W. (2007). SDSM—A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts, Loughborough Univ., Leicestershire, UK.
Wilby, R. L., Dawson, C. W., and Barrow, E. M. (2002). “SDSM—A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts.” Environ. Model. Software, 17, 145–157.
Wilby, R. L., et al. (2000). “Hydrological responses to dynamically and statistically downscaled climate model output.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1199–1202.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16 • Issue 6 • June 2011
Pages: 534 - 539
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 17, 2009
Accepted: Oct 28, 2010
Published online: Oct 30, 2010
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.