Estimation of Continuous Streamflow in Ontario Ungauged Basins: Comparison of Regionalization Methods
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 5
Abstract
Regionalization, a process of transferring hydrological information [i.e., parameters of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, namely, the McMaster University-Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (MAC-HBV)] from gauged to ungauged basins, was applied to estimate continuous flows in ungauged basins across Ontario, Canada. To identify appropriate regionalization methods, different regionalization methods were applied, including the spatial proximity [i.e., kriging, inverse distance weighted (IDW), and mean parameters], physical similarity, and regression-based approaches. Furthermore, an approach coupling the spatial-proximity (IDW) method and the physical similarity approach is proposed. The analysis results show that the coupled regionalization approach as well as the IDW and kriging produce better model performances than the remaining three. Further investigations show that the coupled-regionalization approach provides slightly better performances than the other two spatial proximity methods. In addition, a modified Monte Carlo simulation method is used to assess the estimated flow confidence intervals. The prediction confidence intervals provide additional information on the range of variability of the simulated continuous streamflow in the ungauged basins, and this can be particularly useful for decision making, such as environmental flow determination in ungauged basins.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. The experiment data (precipitation, temperature, flow) were obtained from Environment Canada. The Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data were obtained from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) available at http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/cbanddataproducts.html. The writers acknowledge the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) for providing the original HBV and user manual that was very helpful for the development of the MAC-HBV model. The writers are grateful to three anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their comments that helped to improve the manuscript.
References
Acres International Limited. (1988). “Streamflow analysis methodology for ungauged small-scale hydro sites in Ontario: Study documentation rep.” Environment Canada Inland Water Directorate supported by the Federal Panel on Energy R&D, Ottawa.
Adamowski, K. (2000). “Regional analysis of annual maximum and partial duration flood data by nonparametric and -moment methods.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 229, 219–231.
Bergström, S. (1976). “Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments.” Series A, No. 52, Lund Institute of Technology/Univ. of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Bergström, S. (1991). “Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling.” Nord. Hydrol., 22, 123–136.
Buytaert, W., and Beven, K. (2009). “Regionalization as a learning process.” Water Resour. Res., 45, W11419.
Chang, C., Fiona, A., Damaia, S., and Mann, W. (2002). Ontario flow assessment techniques Version 1.0, User’s Manual, Northeast Science and Information Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario.
Cheng, Q., Koa, C., Yuana, Y., Gea, Y., and Zhang, S. (2006). “GIS modeling for predicting river runoff volume in ungauged drainages in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada.” Comput. Geosci., 32, 1108–1119.
Croke, B. F. W., Merrittc, W. S., and Jakeman, A. J. (2004). “A dynamic model for predicting hydrologic response to land cover changes in gauged and ungauged catchments.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 291, 115–131.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015–1031.
Environment Canada. (2004). HYDAT CD-ROM Version 2.04: Surface water and sediment data, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Environmental Systems Research Institute Canada, Inc. (ESRI). (1997). ESRI ArcCanada: Schools and libraries Version 1.0 [Computer files], Redlands, CA.
Goswami, M., O’Connor, K. M., and Bhattarai, K. P. (2007). “Development of regionalisation procedures using a multi-model approach for flow simulation in an ungauged catchment.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 333, 517–531.
Götzinger, J., and Bárdossy, A. (2007). “Comparison of four regionalisation methods for a distributed hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 333, 374–384.
Groupe de Recherché en Hydrologie Statisque (GREHYS). (1996a). “Inter-comparison of regional flood frequency procedures for Canadian rivers.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 186, 85–103.
Groupe de Recherché en Hydrologie Statisque (GREHYS). (1996b). “Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 186(1–4), 63–84.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F. (2009). “Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 377(1–2), 80–91.
Heuvelmans, G., Muys, B., and Feyen, J. (2006). “Regionalisation of the parameters of a hydrological model: Comparison of linear regression models with artificial neural nets.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 319(1–4), 245–265.
Kay, A. L., Jones, D. A., Crooks, S. M., Calver, A., and Reynard, N. S. (2006). “A comparison of three approaches to spatial generalization of rainfall-runoff models.” Hydrol. Processes, 20, 3953–3973.
Kling, H., and Gupta, H. (2009). “On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 373(3–4), 337–351.
Laahaa, G., and Blöschl, G. (2006). “A comparison of low flow regionalization methods-catchment grouping.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 323, 193–214.
Leclerc, M., and Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2007). “Non-stationary regional flood frequency analysis at ungauged sites.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 343, 254–265.
Lindström, G. (1997). “A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV Model.” Nord. Hydrol., 28(3), 153–168.
Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2004). “Regionalisation of catchment model parameters.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 287, 95–123.
Ministry of Environment and Energy (MEE). (1995). Regionalization of low flow characteristics, Northeastern and Northwestern Ontario, Unionville, Ontario.
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). (2000). Flood Regionalization for Ontario, Ottawa.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2009). “Development in hydrometric networks design: A review.” Rev. Geophys., 47, RG2001.
Mishra, A. K., and Coulibaly, P. (2010). “Hydrometric networks evaluation for Canadian watersheds.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 380, 420–437.
Nathan, R. J., and McMahon, T. A. (1990). “Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalisation.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 121, 217–238.
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Le Moine, N. (2008). “Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 44, W03413.
Oudin, L., Perrin, C., Mathevet, T., Andréassian, V., and Michel, C. (2006). “Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 320, 62–83.
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G. (2005). “A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 157–171.
Post, D. A., and Jakeman, A. J. (1999). “Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in SE Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model.” Ecol. Model., 123, 91–104.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN.” The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Sefton, C. E. M., and Howart, S. M. (1998). “Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 211, 1–16.
Seibert, J. (1999). “Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall runoff model.” Agric. For. Meteorol., 98–99, 279–293.
Seibert, J., and Beven, K. J. (2009). “Gauging the ungauged basin: How many discharge measurements are needed?” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 13(6), 883–892.
Shepard, D. (1968). “A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data.” Proc., 1968 ACM National Conf., New York, 517–524.
Singh, V. P., and Woolhiser, D. A. (2002). “Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(4), 270–292.
et al. (2003). “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB): 2003-2012 PUB science and implementation plan.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857–880.
Stainton, R. T., and Metcalfe, R. A. (2007). “Characterisation and classification of flow regimes of natural rivers in Ontario to support the identification of potential reference basins.” Waterpower Project Science Transfer Rep. 7.0, Ministry of Natural Resources, 90, Ottawa.
Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut (SMHI). (2005). Integrated hydrological modelling system (IHMS) Manual Version 5.8, Norrköping, Sweden, 109.
Viviroli, D., Mittelbach, H., Gurtz, J., and Weingartner, R. (2009). “Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland—Part II: Parameter regionalisation and flood estimation results.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 377, 208–225.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H. V. (2007). “Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins.” Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1756–1774.
Yokoo, Y., Kazama, S., Sawamoto, M., and Nishimura, H. (2001). “Regionalization of lumped water balance model parameters based on multiple regression.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 246, 209–222.
Young, A. R. (2006). “Stream flow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam), 320, 155–172.
Zhang, Y., and Chiew, F. H. S. (2009). “Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments.” Water Resour. Res., 45, W07412.
Zhang, Z., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Bhushan, R. (2008). “Reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins by combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multiobjective optimization.” Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B04.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 16 • Issue 5 • May 2011
Pages: 447 - 459
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 21, 2010
Accepted: Oct 8, 2010
Published online: Apr 15, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.