CASE STUDIES
May 17, 2010

Derivation of Flood Hydrographs for Ungauged Upstream Subwatersheds Using a Main Outlet Hydrograph

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 12

Abstract

Understanding watershed systems is a necessary prerequisite for comprehensive management of the overall basin. Applying simple hydrologic techniques, for which fundamental information is available, is a feasible solution for determination of subwatershed contributions to the generation of total runoff. In this study, an attempt was made to develop an analytical procedure through which the outflow hydrographs could be determined for each subwatershed/area. The technique was based on reverse application of the Muskingum hydrologic routing model and the Area-CN role factor. The technique introduced was then tested to determine if it could solve flood routing problems associated with data for which the input hydrographs were known. A high degree of affinity (i.e., relative error below 32%) was observed between the estimated hydrographs and the recorded data, which verified the satisfactory applicability of the developed approach for estimation of the runoff generated by each subwatershed/area.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers are indebted to Professor G. Das for his constructive suggestions and comments at model development stage. We also acknowledge Iran Ministries of Jihad-e-Agriculture and Power for providing necessary information and data.

References

Ahmed, N. (1996). “Statistical distributions and natural hydrograph.” Proc., North American Water and Environment Congress & Destructive Water, C. Bathala, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 292–297.
Birkhead, A. L., and James, C. S. (2002). “Muskingum river routing with dynamic bank storage.” J. Hydrol., 264, 113–132.
Chen, J., and Yang, X. (2007). “Optimal parameter estimation for Muskingum model based on gray-encoded accelerating genetic algorithm.” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 12, 849–858.
Choudhury, P., Shrivastava, R. K., and Narulkar, S. M. (2002). “Flood routing in river networks using equivalent Muskingum inflow.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(6), 413–419.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. M. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Coles, N. A., Sivapalan, M., Larsen, J. E., Linnet, P. E., and Fahrner, C. K. (1997). “Modeling runoff generation on small agricultural catchments: Can real world runoff responses be captured?” Hydrolog. Process., 11(2), 111–136.
Hann, C. T., Barfield, B. J., and Hayes, J. C. (1996). Design hydrology and sedimentology for small watersheds, Academic, San Diego.
Kuhn, N. J., and Yair, A. (2004). “Spatial distribution of surface conditions and runoff generation in small arid watersheds, Zin Valley Badlands, Israel.” Geomorphology, 57, 183–200.
Lange, J., Leibundgut, C., and Schick, A. P. (2001). “Design flood estimation in ungauged arid catchments-rainfall-runoff models or regionalized runoff statistics?” Proc., EGS XXVI General Assembly, European Geophysical Society, Germany.
Liu, X., and Li, J. (2008). “Application of SCS model in estimation of runoff from small watershed in Loess plateau of China.” Chin. Geogr. Sci., 18(3), 235–241.
Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L., and Dalezios, N. R. (2002). “Runoff estimation for ungauged watersheds using a conceptual model and neural networks.” Proc., EGS XXVII General Assembly, European Geophysical Society, Germany.
Moussa, R., Chahinian, N., and Bocquillon, C. (2007). “Distributed hydrological modelling of a Mediterranean mountainous catchment: Model construction and multi-site validation.” J. Hydrol., 337, 35–51.
Mwakalila, S. (2002). “Estimation of stream flows of ungauged catchments for river basin management.” Proc., 3rd WaterNet/Warfsa Symp., Water Demand Management for Sustainable Development, Southern African Development Community, South Africa, 1–9.
Ping, F., and Xiaofang, R. (1999). “Method of flood routing for multibranch rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(3), 271–276.
Roughani, M., Ghafouri, M., and Tabatabaei, M. (2007). “An innovative methodology for the prioritization of sub-catchments for flood control.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 9, 79–87.
Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2000). “Some aspects of spatial and temporal distribution and development of prediction models of watershed sediment yield.” Ph.D. dissertation, G.B. Pant Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Sadeghi, S. H. R., and Mahdavi, M. (2004). “Applicability of SEDIMOT II model in flood and sediment yield estimation.” J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 6(3&4), 147–154.
Sadeghi, S. H. R., and Singh, J. K. (2005). “Development of synthetic sediment graph using hydrological data.” J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 7(1&2), 69–77.
Sadeghi, S. H. R., Singh, J. K., and Das, G. (2000). “Rainfall-runoff relationship model for Amameh watershed in Iran.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Integrated Water Resources Management, 796–804.
Singh, J. K., and Sadeghi, S. H. R. (2007). “Hydrologic response evaluation of ungauged sub-watersheds in generation of total runoff from a watershed.” Proc., Water Resources Management 2007, J. Wilson, ed., International Association of Science and Technology for Development, USA, 155–158.
Singh, V. P. (1992). Elementary hydrology, Eastern Economy Edition, New Delhi, India.
Singh, V. P., and Scarlatos, P. D. (1987). “Analysis of nonlinear muskingum flood routing.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 113(1), 61–79.
Subramanya, K. (2000). Engineering hydrology, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India.
Syed, K. H., Goodrich, D. C., Myers, D. E., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff.” J. Hydrol., 271, 1–21.
Tung, Y. K. (1985). “River flood routing by nonlinear muskingum method.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 111(12), 1447–1460.
Water Resources Research Center (WRRC). (1997). Water Year Rep., Tehran, Iran.
Wilson, B. N., Barfield, B. J., Warner, A. D., and Moore, I. D. (1981). “SEDIMOT II: A design hydrology and sedimentology model for surface mine lands.” Proc., Surface Mining Hydrology, Sedimentology and Reclamation, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
Xiong, Y., and Melching, C. S. (2005). “Comparison of kinematic-wave and nonlinear reservoir routing of urban watershed runoff.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 10(1), 39–49.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15Issue 12December 2010
Pages: 1059 - 1069

History

Received: Jan 3, 2008
Accepted: May 10, 2010
Published online: May 17, 2010
Published in print: Dec 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi [email protected]
Head and Associate Professor, Dept. of Watershed Management Engineering, College of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares Univ., Noor 46417-76489, Mazandaran, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jai Karan Singh [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, College of Technology, Govind Ballabh Pant Univ. of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar 263145, Uttaranchal, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share