Comparison of Flood Top Width Predictions Using Surveyed and LiDAR-Derived Channel Geometries
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper compares flood top width predictions generated by a one-dimensional flood model using surveyed and light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-based topographic descriptions for varying storm event return intervals. Three channel geometries are used in the analysis: (1) based entirely on survey data; (2) based entirely on LiDAR data; and (3) based on a hybrid file that merges survey-derived channel bank locations and LiDAR-derived cross sections. The study area is a 6.6-km river reach located in the Piedmont area of North Carolina. Four steady flow simulations are performed representing the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year design storm events to understand the effect of storm return period on top width predictions using the three different topographic descriptions. The results from the study suggest that the LiDAR derived geometries generally predicted higher widths compared to the survey geometries, and that the magnitude of the difference is inversely related to the storm even return interval (12% average difference for a 10-year storm event to 4% for a 500-year storm event).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded in part by the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). The writers would like to thank the anonymous reviewers who greatly improved this paper.
References
Bates, P. D., Marks, K. J., and Horritt, M. S. (2003). “Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models.” Hydrolog. Process., 17(3), 537–557.
Cobby, D. M., Mason, D., Horritt, M. S., and Bates, P. D. (2003). “Two-dimensional hydraulic flood modeling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry.” Hydrolog. Process., 17(10), 1979–2000.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). (1998). “Developing a hydrology extension for ArcView spatial analyst.” ArcUser Magazine, ⟨http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/arcuser498/hydrology.html⟩ (Nov. 20, 2009).
FEMA. (2003). “Guidelines and specifications for flood hazard mapping partners. Appendix A: Guidelines for aerial mapping and surveying.” ⟨http://www.fema.gov/pdf/fhm/frm_gsaa.pdf⟩ (Apr. 14, 2008).
French, J. R. (2003). “Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modeling.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 28(3), 321–335.
Hodgson, M. E., and Bresnahan, P. (2004). “Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: Empirical assessment and error budget.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 70(3), 331–339.
Homer, C., et al. (2007). “Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 73(4), 337–341.
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (2002). “HEC-RAS, river analysis system.” Hydraulic reference manual. HEC, ⟨http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/documents/HEC-RAS_4.0_Reference_Manual.pdf⟩ (Nov. 5, 2008).
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). (2005). “HEC-GeoRAS, GIS tools for support of HEC-RAS using Arc-GIS.” Users’ manual, version 4, ⟨http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/hec-georas.html⟩ (Nov. 5, 2008).
The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). IPCC WGI, climate change 2001: The scientific basis, contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, and D. Xiaosu, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Keqi Zhang, Chen, S. C., Whitman, D., Shyu, M. L., Yan, J. H., and Zhang, C. (2003). “A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements for airborne LIDAR data.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41(4), 872–882.
Marks, K., and Bates, P. (2000). “Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flood models.” Hydrolog. Process., 14(11–12), 2109–2122.
Merwade, V., Olivera, F., Arabi, M., and Edleman, S. (2008). “Uncertainty in flood inundation mapping: Current issues and future directions.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(7), 608–620.
National Academy of Science (NAS). (2007). Elevation data for floodplain mapping, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP). (2003). “Issue 37: Quality control of light detection and ranging elevation data in North Carolina for phase II of the North Carolina floodplain mapping program.” ⟨http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/pubdocs/issue_papers/IP37-phaseII_lidar_qc.pdf⟩ (Apr. 23, 2008).
Raber, G. T., Jensen, J. R., Hodgson, M. E., Tullis, J. A., Davis, B. A., and Berglund, J. (2007). “Impact of lidar nominal post-spacing on DEM accuracy and flood zone delineation.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 73(7), 793–804.
Sanders, B. F. (2007). “Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling.” Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1831–1843.
Shamsi, U. M. (2001). “GIS and modeling integration.” CE News, 13(6), 46–49.
Tate, E. C., Maidment, D. R., Olivera, F., and Anderson, D. J. (2002). “Creating a terrain model for floodplain mapping.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(2), 100–108.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and FEMA. (2000). “Hurricane Floyd assessment: Review of hurricane evacuation studies utilization and information dissemination.” Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc., ⟨http://csc.noaa.gov/hes/docs/postStorm/H_FLOYD_ASSESSMENT_REVIEW_HES_UTILIZATION_INFO_DISSEMINATION.pdf⟩ (Nov. 20, 2009).
Walker, J. P., and Willgoose, G. R. (1999). “On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology.” Water Resour. Res., 35(7), 2259–2268.
Wang, Y., and Zheng, T. (2005). “Comparison of light detection and ranging and national elevation dataset digital elevation model on floodplains of North Carolina.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 6(1), 34–40.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (2003). “Our future climate.” WMO No. 952, WMO, Geneva.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15 • Issue 2 • February 2010
Pages: 97 - 106
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 4, 2008
Accepted: Jun 26, 2009
Published online: Jun 29, 2009
Published in print: Feb 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.