CASE STUDIES
Sep 1, 2009

Design of Integrated Bioinfiltration-Detention Urban Retrofits with Design Storm and Continuous Simulation Methods

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 6

Abstract

This article presents the elements involved in the design of a bioretention planter/trench infiltration-detention system as part of a very large-scale urban retrofit project. The prototype system was designed to intercept all of the runoff from a synthetic 5.08-mm 24-h rainfall event. Diverted flows were conveyed into bioretention planter for treatment. The bioretention systems were fingerprinted into areas comprising 0.8% of the contributory drainage areas, with an associated stone trench comprising another 3.4%. As layered systems, an approach that is capable of modeling vertical flows in addition to dynamic routing of outflows is used. The system was first modeled using HydroCAD, a design storm event modeling software. A four-compartment node system is used to model the dynamics of flow through the layers. The system was then modeled using SWMM 5.0.014 continuous simulation software. The resulting response to a design storm was computed by both of these models to compare the results of each method. The resulting SWMM model was then run on the 2005 design year rainfall distribution. Under existing conditions, over 60% of annual runoff volume exceeded the 3.50Ls1ha1 (0.05cfs-ac1) threshold for initiation of combined sewer overflows (CSOs). Nearly all runoff was intercepted by the planter/trench infiltration system and even with a soil infiltration rate of only 2.54mmh1 , 47% was infiltrated, and less than 6% was discharged at rates that could initiate CSOs. The number of CSO exceedance pulses was reduced from 233 to 6, a reduction of 97%. The volume of flows exceeding the CSO threshold decreased by 90% in the planter/trench system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was done under a contract with Camp Dresser and McKee on behalf of the Philadelphia Water Department, Office of Watersheds. The writer wishes to express thanks to these organizations for the opportunity to undertake this analysis, and to thank CDM personnel for providing support in the design and modeling approach.

References

Bedient, P. B., and Huber, W. C. (1988). Hydrology and floodplain analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Blanco-Canqui, H., Gantzer, C. J., Anderson, S. H., and Alberts, E. E. (2004a). “Grass barriers for reduced concentrated flow induced soil and nutrient loss.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1963–1972.
Blanco-Canqui, H., Gantzer, C. J., Anderson, S. H., Alberts, E. E., and Thompson, A. L. (2004b). “Grass barrier and vegetative filter strip effectiveness in reducing runoff, sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus loss.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1670–1678.
Culbertson, T. A., and Hutchinson, S. L. (2004). “Assessing bioretention cell function in a Midwest continental climate.” Proc., 2004 ASABE Annual Int. Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Ottawa.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban storm-water management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Hallam, L., and Carpenter, D. (2008). “An evaluation of planting soil mixtures on bioretention cell performance.” Proc., Low Impact Development 2008, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., and Deletic, A. (2008). “Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media storm-water filtration systems.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(7), 2535–2541.
Hatt, B. E., Siriwardene, N., Deletic, A., and Fletcher, T. D. (2005). “Filter media for stormwater treatment and recycling: The influence of hydraulic properties of flow on pollutant removal.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Urban Drainage, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen.
Hunt, W. F., Smith, J. T., Shedlock, S. J., Hathaway, J. M., and Eubanks, P. R. (2008). “Pollutant loading and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, N.C.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(5), 403–408.
James, W., et al. (2008). User’s guide to SWMM5, Computational Hydraulics International, Guelph, Ont.
Le Coustumer, S., Fletcher, T. D., Deletic, A., and Barraud, S. (2007). “Hydraulic performance of biofilters for stormwater management: First lessons from both laboratory and field studies.” Water Sci. Technol., 56(10), 93–100.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2008). “Urban particle capture in bioretention media. I: Laboratory and field studies.” J. Environ. Eng., 134(6), 419–432.
LimnoTech. (2009). “Case studies of hydrologic and hydraulic modeling efforts to support assessment of green infrastructure as a CSO mitigation measure.” Draft Rep. Prepared for U.S. EPA.
Lucas, W. C., and Greenway, M. (2007). “A study of hydraulic dynamics in vegetated and non-vegetated bioretention mesocosms.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on HydroScience and Engineering (ICHE 2006), Drexel University, Philadelphia, ⟨http://idea.library.drexel.edu/bitstream/1860/1453/1/2007017108.pdf⟩ (April 5, 2010).
Nestingen, R. S., Asleson, B. C., Gulliver, J. S., Hozalski, M., and Nieber, J. L. (2007). “Techniques to assess rain gardens as stormwater best management practices.” Proc., Stormwater and Urban Water Systems Modeling Conf., Computational Hydraulics International, Toronto.
Novák, V., Simunek, J., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2000). “Infiltration of water into soil with cracks.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 126(1), 41–47.
Pitt, R. E. (1987). “Small storm flow and particulate washoff contributions to outfall discharges.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
Rachman, A., Anderson, S. H., Gantzer, C. J., and Thompson, A. L. (2004). “Influence of stiff-stemmed grass hedge systems on infiltration.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 2000–2006.
Ralston, M. R. (2004). “Fox hollow infiltration facility.” Proc., Putting the LID on Stormwater Management: 1st National Low Impact Development Conf., B. Rustia, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Rose, C. W. (2004). An introduction to the environmental physics of soil water and watersheds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Saxton, K. E. (2005). “SPAW. Soil-plant-atmosphere-water field & pond hydrology operational manual.” ⟨http://users.adelphia.net/~ksaxton/ftp%20files/SPAW%20Operational%20Manual-6.02.52.doc⟩ (July 8, 2008).
Saxton, K. E., and Rawls, W. J. (2006). “Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1569–1578.
Seobi, T., Anderson, S. H., Udawatta, R. P., and Gantzer, C. J. (2005). “Influence of grass and agroforestry buffer strips on soil hydraulic properties for an albaqualf.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 893–901.
Sharma, S. K., Mohanty, B. P., and Zhu, J. (2006). “Including topography and vegetation attributes for developing pedotransfer functions.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1430–1440.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 15Issue 6June 2010
Pages: 486 - 498

History

Received: Dec 8, 2008
Accepted: Aug 28, 2009
Published online: Sep 1, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William C. Lucas, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Doctoral Candidate, Griffith Univ., Nathan Campus, Brisbane, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share