Comparison of Lumped and Quasi-Distributed Clark Runoff Models Using the SCS Curve Number Equation
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 10
Abstract
The Clark synthetic unit hydrograph and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number method has been used to simulate the rainfall and runoff behavior of a watershed for many years. Methodologies like Clark generally rely on the use of lumped or average rainfall and runoff parameters defined for the watershed, even though such parameters are spatially variable. In an attempt to leverage spatial parameters derived from geographic information, a modified Clark (ModClark) method or quasi-distributed model was developed for HEC-HMS. The ModClark method was initially developed to use the national network of WSR-88D radar (NEXRAD) rainfall data but few has been published on its application which is likely because of the difficulties in obtaining usable and reliable radar rainfall data and because of a lack of despisal preprocessing tools required to parameterize a ModClark simulation. While the original implementation and testing of the ModClark method required the use of NEXRAD data in specific formats, this study shows that it is possible to use any real or synthetic rainfall data whether it is spatially distributed or not. By not restricting the use of the distributed ModClark method to the use of spatially varying rainfall, distributed loss methods such as the commonly used SCS curve number can vary spatially over a grid and the effects of distributed watershed loss parameters can be analyzed with or without distributed rainfall. The implementation of the ModClark method in HEC-HMS is validated by comparing results to the Clark method using identical CN values. Further tests and examination of the SCS equation demonstrate that the runoff computed from distributed CN is always greater than the runoff computed from the traditional composite or area-averaged CN for ordinary ranges of rainfall depths. Moreover, by allowing a relatively fine grid resolution, the ModClark method determines the overall runoff from the watershed using a discharge weighted approach as opposed to weighted CN, which as reported in the National Engineering Handbook Part 630 is more accurate.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ajami, N. K., Gupta, H., Wagner, T., and Sorooshian, S. (2004). “Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system.” J. Hydrol., 298, 112–135.
Charley, W., Pabst, A., and Peters, J. (1995). “The hydrologic modeling system (HEC-HMS): Design and development issues.” Technical Rep. No. 149, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
Davis, D. W. (1993). “The HEC NEXGEN software development project, Technical Paper 138.” Rep. No. TP-138, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
Dodson & Associates. (1992). “Hands on HEC-1.” Technical Rep. No. 88, Dodson & Associates, Houston, Tex.
EPA. (2008). ⟨http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm⟩ (Nov. 1, 2008).
Hartman, B. R., and Nelson, E. J. (2001). “A central method for geospatial data acquisition (GSDA).” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE/EWRI, Orlando, Fla.
Kull, D. W., and Feldman, A. D. (1998). “Evolution of Clark’s unit hydrograph method to spatially distributed runoff.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 3(1), 9–19.
Nelson, E. J. (2006). Watershed modeling system (WMS), user’s manual, Brigham Young University Environmental Modeling Research Lab, Provo, Utah.
Peters, J. C., and Easton, D. J. (1996). “Runoff simulation using radar rainfall data.” Water Resour. Bull., 32, 753–760.
Sui, D. Z., and Maggio, R. C. (1999). “Integrating GIS with hydrological modeling: Practices, problems, and prospects.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 23(4), 33–51.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. (1994). “Flood runoff analysis.” Rep. No. EM 1110-2-1417, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center. (1998). HEC-1 flood hydrograph package user’s manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center. (2001). HEC HMS, user’s manual version 2.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, Washington, D.C.
USDA-NRCS. (2004). “Part 630 hydrology: Chapter 10.” National engineering handbook, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
USGS. (2008a). ⟨http://edc2.usgs.gov/geodata/index.php⟩ (Nov. 1, 2008).
USGS. (2008b). ⟨http://seamless.usgs.gov⟩ (Nov. 1, 2008).
Wanielista, M., Maggio, R. C., and Kersten, R. (1997). Hydrology—Water quantity and quality control, Wiley, New York, 68.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 22, 2008
Accepted: Feb 6, 2009
Published online: Sep 15, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.