Interaction between Topographic and Process Parameters due to the Spatial Resolution of DEMs in Distributed Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 10
Abstract
Selecting an appropriate digital elevation model (DEM) resolution is an essential part of distributed rainfall-runoff modeling since the resolution affects parameter values and, in turn, leads to predictive uncertainty. Moreover, the DEM resolution directly determines the computational workload required for model simulation. This study conducted several experiments to clarify the interaction between topographic and process parameters due to the spatial resolution of DEMs in distributed rainfall-runoff modeling. First, five different spatial resolutions (from 50 m to 1 km) were used to analyze the effects of DEM resolution on the topographic and process parameters of a distributed rainfall-runoff model [kinematic wave method for subsurface and surface runoff (KWMSS)]. Second, parameter compatibility was tested with regard to the sensitivity of model performance to optimal parameter values for each DEM, by applying the best-performing parameter combinations for each resolution to the models based on differing resolutions. Finally, the sensitivity of model performances to artificially generated parameters (deviating ±10% from optimal parameter sets) was analyzed to determine whether fine spatial discretization yielded equally good model performance measures or indistinguishable hydrographs (i.e., equifinality). The results indicate that differing topographic parameters due to distinct DEM sizes require differing process parameters to produce identically good runoff simulations. In addition, the parameter compatibility assessment suggests that increased spatial complexity due to fine DEM resolution results in decreased identifiability in process parameters. Consequently, nonoptimal parameter values can yield acceptable model performance measures when modeling is based on DEM resolutions of 250 m and smaller. The results of the sensitivity analysis also indicate that fine spatial discretization can be a dominant factor causing equifinality as well as overparameterization in distributed rainfall-runoff modeling. These findings may provide a new perspective on the equifinality problem, which many consider to be caused by huge model parameter requirements when operating distributed models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Beven, K. (2005). “Rainfall-runoff modeling: Introduction.” Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, M. G. Anderson and J. J. McDonnell, eds., Vol. 3, Wiley, New York, 1857–1868.
Beven, K. (2006). “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol., 320(1–2), 18–36.
Brasington, J., and Richards, K. (1998). “Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL.” Comput. Geosci., 24(4), 299–314.
Brath, A., Montanari, A., and Toth, E. (2004). “Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model.” J. Hydrol., 291, 232–253.
Bruneau, P., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Robin, P., Merot, Ph., and Beven, K. (1995). “The sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data.” Hydrolog. Process., 9(1), 69–81.
Duan, Q., Gupta, V. K., and Sorooshian, S. (1993). “Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization.” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 76(3), 501–521.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015–1031.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1994). “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” J. Hydrol., 158, 265–284.
Eckhardt, K., and Arnold, J. G. (2001). “Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model.” J. Hydrol., 251, 103–109.
Frances, F., Velez, J. I., and Velez, J. J. (2007). “Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 332, 226–240.
Ichikawa, Y., Murakami, M., Tachikawa, T. and Shiiba, M. (2001). “Development of a basin runoff simulation system based on a new digital topographic model.” Journal of Hydraulic, Coastal and Environmental Engineering, JSCE, 691, 43–52 (in Japanese).
Pradhan, N. R., Tachikawa, Y., and Takara, K. (2006). “A downscaling method of topographic index distribution for matching the scales of model application and parameter identification.” Hydrolog. Process., 20, 1385–1405.
Refsgaard, J. C., Thorsen, M., Jensen, J. B., Kleeschulte, S., and Hansen, S. (1999). “Large scale modelling of groundwater contamination form nitrate leaching.” J. Hydrol., 221, 117–140.
Reggiani, P., and Schellekens, J. (2005). “Rainfall-runoff modeling: Distributed models.” Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, M. G. Anderson and J. J. McDonnell, eds., Vol. 3, Wiley, New York, 1967–1983.
Senarath, S., Ogden, F. L., Downer, C. W., and Sharif, H. O. (2000). “On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models.” Water Resour. Res., 36(6), 1495–1510.
Shiiba, M., Ichikawa, Y., Sakakibara, T. and Tachikawa, Y. (1999). “A new numerical representation form of basin topography.” Journal of Hydraulic, Coastal and Environmental Engineering, JSCE, 621, 1–9 (in Japanese).
Sivapalan, M., and Kalma, J. D. (1995). “Scale problems in hydrology: The contributions of the Robertson workshop.” Scale issues in hydrological modeling, J. D. Kalma and M. Sivapalan, eds., Wiley, New York, 1–8.
Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V. K., and (1995). “Model calibration.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Englewood, Colo., 23–68.
Tachikawa, Y., Lee, G., Pradhan, N. R., Furuichi, S., Kobayashi, K., Sayama, T., and Takara, K. (2006), “Predictions of heavy floods in 2004 and 2005 in Japan and PUB.” Proc., 3rd APHW Conf. (CD-ROM), Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resorces, Bangkok, 8.
Tachikawa, Y., Nagatani, G. and Takara, K. (2004). “Development of stage-discharge relationship equation incorporating saturated-unsaturated flow mechanism.” Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, 48, 7–12 (in Japanese).
Vazquez, R. F., Feyen, L., Feyen, J., and Refsgaard, J. C. (2002). “Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE-SHE code.” Hydrolog. Process., 16(2), 355–372.
Vieux, B. E. (2004). “Distributed hydrologic modeling.” Distributed hydrological modeling using GIS, B. E. Vieux, ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1–19.
Wagener, T., and Gupta, H. V. (2005). “Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 19, 378–387.
Wagener, T., Lees, M. J., and Wheater, H. S. (2002). “A toolkit for the development and application of parsimonious hydrological models.” Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh and D. Frevert, eds., Vol. 1, Water Resources Publishers, Englewood, Colo., 87–136.
Wolock, D. M., and Price, C. V. (1994). “Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model.” Water Resour. Res. 30(11), 3041–3052.
Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L. (1988). “Effects of spatial variability and scale with implication to hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 102, 29–47.
Zhang, W., and Montgomery, D. R. (1994). “Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 30, 1019–1028.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 14 • Issue 10 • October 2009
Pages: 1059 - 1069
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 22, 2008
Accepted: Feb 3, 2009
Published online: Feb 18, 2009
Published in print: Oct 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.