Free access
Technical Breakthrough Abstracts
Oct 19, 2022

Uniqueness of Suction Stress Value at Liquid Limit of Soil

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1
The liquid limit (LL) is a soil property index in the Unified Soil Classification System, originally devised by Swedish scientist Albert Atterberg in 1911 and later refined by Casagrande’s percussion cup test. The LL marks water content at certain strength of a soil and can be related to undrained shear strength of 1.7  kPa in the fall-cone test (Hansbo 1957; Claveau-Mallet et al. 2012). Because the conventional test for determining the LL involves manual operation, repeated trials, and visual judgment, it suffers from poor repeatability, and it is labor intensive.
Effective stress σ is the stress acting on soil’s skeleton due to the total stress, pore water pressure (Terzaghi 1943), and interparticle suction stress (Lu and Likos 2006). The unified effective stress equation for soil under both saturated and unsaturated conditions is (Lu and Likos 2006)
σ=σσs(w)
(1)
where σs(w)=a soil’s suction stress characteristic curve (SSCC) being a function of water content w.
Under the unified effective stress Eq. (1), the LL is the undrained shear strength equal to the prevailing suction stress of 1.7  kPa when a soil is fully saturated. Herein, the effective stress reaches its critical state (i.e., zero) or the total stress equals to the prevailing suction stress. Thus, a soil’s SSCC can be directly linked to the liquid limit.
Soil shrinkage curve test [Fig. 1(a), Dong and Lu 2017] is used to measure a soil’s SSCC from its slurry state. From the measured SSCC, water content at the suction stresses corresponding to 1.7  kPa (LL) can be uniquely quantified [Fig. 1(b)].
Fig. 1. (a) Measurement of suction stress by a computer-automated soil shrinkage test setup in which soil specimen is undergoing drying from slurry state to air dry state; (b) measured soil water content versus suction stress for four soils; and (c) comparison between LL by ASTM D4318-17e1 and by suction stress measurements for a variety of fine-grained soils. R2 = coefficient of determination; MAPE = mean absolute percentage error; and NRMSE = normalized root mean square error.

Result

Various fine-grained soils with a wide range of liquid limit up to 500% are tested. The excellent correlation indexes (R2=0.9985, MAPE=5.06%, and NRMSE=4.86%) between the LL from the ASTM D4318-17e1 (ASTM 2017) tests and suction stress tests, shown in Fig. 1(c), experimentally validate that suction stress is the mechanics origin responsible for LL and converges uniquely to 1.7  kPa for LL of soil.

Significance

Identifying the mechanics origin of liquid limit (i.e., suction stress) confirms the validity of the unified effective stress principle: undrained failure occurs at liquid limit when effective stress reaches zero (i.e., external total stress equals to suction stress). It is shown that computer-automated suction stress measurement can accurately quantify liquid limit of soil, which opens a new window for modernizing soil classification beyond the traditional Atterberg limits tests.

References

ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Claveau-Mallet, D., F. Duhaime, and R. P. Chapuis. 2012. “Practical considerations when using the Swedish fall cone.” Geotech. Testing J. 35 (4): 104178–104628. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ104178.
Dong, Y., and N. Lu. 2017. “Measurement of suction stress characteristic curve under drying and wetting conditions.” Geotech. Testing J. 40 (1): 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160058.
Hansbo, S. 1957. “A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall-cone test.” In Proc., Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish Geotechnical Institute.
Lu, N., and W. J. Likos. 2006. “Suction stress characteristic curve for unsaturated soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(131).
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: Wiley.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Jul 21, 2022
Accepted: Aug 29, 2022
Published online: Oct 19, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-129X. Email: [email protected]
Angel Rodrigo Angulo Calderon [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401. Email: [email protected]
Alexandra Wayllace, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Teaching Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share