Pore Pressure Generation of Gravelly Soils in Constant Volume Cyclic Simple Shear
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 2
Abstract
Excess pore pressure generation of uniform gravel and gravel-sand mixtures was evaluated in this study. Comparisons were made with existing relationships for pore pressure generation of sands and show that gravel and gravel-sand mixtures can exhibit different pore pressure responses. The influence of liquefaction definition, gravel particle angularity, particle size, relative density, initial vertical effective stress, cyclic stress ratio, and gravel percentage, on the generation of excess pore water pressure of gravel and gravel-sand mixtures was studied. Liquefaction definition, particle size, initial vertical effective stress, and cyclic stress ratio were found to not have a significant effect on the normalized excess pore pressure generation (i.e., versus ). Conversely, relative density, particle angularity, and mixture percentage of gravels were found to have a more significant effect on the normalized excess pore pressure generation response (i.e., versus ). Additionally, the coefficient of uniformity () was found to have a strong correlation with increased excess pore pressure generation ratio at values of less than 0.40, highlighting the influence of grain size distribution on early pore pressure generation response. A new pore pressure model was developed to predict based on for gravelly soils.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Student Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE 1256260, by the National Science Foundation CAREER Grant No. 1351403, and by CMMI Grant No. 1663288. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
References
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for consolidated undrained cyclic direct simple shear test under constant volume with load control or displacement control. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Banerjee, N. G., H. B. Seed, and C. K. Chan. 1979. Cyclic behavior of dense coarse-grained materials in relation to the seismic stability of dams. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Belkhatir, M., T. Schanz, A. Arab, N. Della, and A. Kadri. 2014. “Insight into the effects of gradation on the pore pressure generation of sand–silt mixtures.” Geotech. Test. J. 37 (5): 20130051. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20130051.
Berrill, J. B., and R. O. Davis. 1985. “Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: Revised model.” Soils Found. 25 (2): 106–118. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.2_106.
Booker, J. R., M. S. Rahman, and H. B. Seed. 1976. GADFLEA: A computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Chang, W. J., C. W. Chang, and J. K. Zeng. 2014. “Liquefaction characteristics of gap-graded gravelly soils in condition.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 56 (Nov): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.10.005.
Cubrinovski, M., and K. Ishihara. 2002. “Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sands.” Soils Found. 42 (6): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.6_65.
Dash, H. K., and T. G. Sitharam. 2009. “Undrained cyclic pore pressure response of sand–silt mixtures: Effect of nonplastic fines and other parameters.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 27 (4): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9252-5.
De Alba, P., C. K. Chan, and H. B. Seed. 1975. Determination of soil liquefaction characteristics by large scale laboratory tests. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquake by the cyclic strain method. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
Dobry, R., W. G. Pierce, R. Dyvik, G. E. Thomas, and R. S. Ladd. 1985. Pore pressure model for cyclic straining of sand. Research Rep. No. CE-85. New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Dyvik, R., T. Berre, S. Lacasse, and B. Raadim. 1987. “Comparison of truly undrained and constant volume direct simple shear tests.” Geotechnique 37 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.3.
Evans, M. D., and H. B. Seed. 1987. Undrained cyclic triaxial testing of gravels—The effect of membrane compliance. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Evans, M. D., and S. Zhou. 1995. “Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (3): 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:3(287).
Fragaszy, R. J., and S. Sneider. 1991. “Compaction control of granular soils: Final report.” Research Project GC 8720, Task 08. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Planning, Research and Public Transportation Division.
Green, R. A., J. K. Mitchell, and C. P. Polito. 2000. “An energy-based excess pore pressure generation model for cohesionless soils.” In Proc., The John Booker Memorial Symp.—Developments in Theoretical Geomechanics, 383–390. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Haeri, S. M., and M. R. Shakeri. 2010. “Effects of membrane compliance on pore water pressure generation in gravelly sands under cyclic loading.” Geotech. Test. J. 33 (5): 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ102433.
Hubler, J. F., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2017a. “Monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001723.
Hubler, J. F., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2017b. “Pore pressure generation of pea gravel, sand, and gravel-sand mixtures in constant volume simple shear.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (PBD-III). Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Hubler, J. F., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2018. “Monotonic and cyclic simple shear response of gravel-sand mixtures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (11): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.016.
Hynes, M. E. 1988. “Pore pressure generation characteristics of gravel under undrained cyclic loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California.
Kammerer, A. M., J. Wu, M. F. Riemer, J. M. Pestana, and R. B. Seed. 2004. “A new multi-directional direct simple shear testing database.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Kokusho, T. 2013. “Liquefaction potential evaluations: Energy-based method versus stress-based method.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (10): 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0456.
Lade, P. V., C. D. Liggio, and J. A. Yamamuro. 1998. “Effects of non-plastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand.” ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 21 (4): 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11373J.
Lee, K. L., and A. Albaisa. 1974. “Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 100 (4): 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000034.
Martin, G. R., H. B. Seed, and W. D. L. Finn. 1975. “Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101 (5): 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000164.
Mei, X., S. Olson, and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2018. “Empirical porewater pressure generation model parameters in 1-D seismic site response analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114 (7): 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.011.
Polito, C. P. 1999. “The effects of non-plastic and plastic fines on the liquefaction of sandy soils.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
Polito, C. P., R. A. Green, and J. Lee. 2008. “Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490).
Polito, C. P., and J. R. Martin. 2001. “Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (5): 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408).
Polito, C. P., and E. L. Sibley. 2020. “Threshold fines content and behavior of sands with nonplastic silts.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (3): 462–465. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0698.
Porcino, D., and V. Diano. 2016. “Laboratory study on pore pressure generation and liquefaction of low-plasticity silty sandy soils during the 2012 earthquake in Italy.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (10): 04016048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001518.
Seed, H. B., P. P. Martin, and J. Lysmer. 1975. The generation and dissipation of pore-water pressures during soil liquefaction. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Sivathayalan, S. 2000. “Fabric, initial state and stress path effects on liquefaction susceptibility of sands.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Vaid, Y. P., and S. Sivathayalan. 1996. “Static and cyclic liquefaction potential of Fraser Delta sand in simple shear and triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 33 (2): 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-007.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1986. Pore pressure build-up and liquefaction at level sandy sites during earthquakes. New York: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Wong, R. T., H. B. Seed, and C. K. Chan. 1974. Liquefaction of gravelly soils under cyclic loading conditions. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Wu, J., A. M. Kammerer, M. F. Riemer, R. B. Seed, and J. M. Pestana. 2004. “Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, BC, Canada: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Zekkos, D., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, J. F. Hubler, X. Fei, K. Zehtab, and A. Marr. 2018. “Development of a large-size cyclic direct simple shear device for characterization of ground materials with oversized particles.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (2): 20160271. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160271.
Zorapapel, G. B. T., and M. Vucetic. 1994. “The effects of seismic pore water pressure on ground surface motion.” Earthquake Spectra 10 (2): 403–438. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585780.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149 • Issue 2 • February 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 7, 2021
Accepted: Aug 10, 2022
Published online: Dec 1, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 1, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Guoxing Chen, You Qin, Qi Wu, Xiaoqiang Gu, C. Hsein Juang, A Unified Model of Cyclic Shear–Volume Coupling and Excess Pore Water Pressure Generation for Sandy Soils under Various Cyclic Loading Patterns, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12247, 150, 9, (2024).
- Anna Chiaradonna, Rayka Mohammadi, Paola Monaco, Simulation of the Seismic Response of a Man-Made Well-Graded Gravel as Recorded by a Vertical Instrumented Array, Geo-Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485316.015, (132-140), (2024).