Membrane Behavior of Kaolin–Bentonite Mixtures
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 10
Abstract
The semipermeable membrane behavior of clay effectively reduces solute flux and therefore can be beneficial in clays used as barriers in chemical containment applications. Except for geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs), the membrane behavior of bentonite-amended soils has been evaluated only at a relatively low bentonite content (BC) (). Kaolin–bentonite mixtures with a BC ranging from 0% to 37.5% were tested for membrane behavior using closed-system (no-flow) boundary conditions. The membrane efficiency coefficient was derived from the measured chemico-osmotic pressure differences induced across the specimens under a concentration difference of 20-mM KCl. The of the kaolin–bentonite mixtures increased from 0 to 0.197 with increasing BC. The trend of with increasing BC could be described in three stages: initial stage, transitional stage, and residual stage. The results indicated the occurrence of a threshold BC above which additional bentonite had limited effect in terms of membrane behavior. The threshold BC in this study was 28.6% for the given test conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program (No. 2019QZKK0905).
References
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for determination of water content of soil and rock by microwave oven heating. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benzel, W. M., and D. L. Graf. 1984. “Studies of smectite membrane behavior: Importance of layer thickness and fabric in experiments at 20°C.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48 (9): 1769–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90031-0.
Dominijanni, A., N. Guarena, and M. Manassero. 2018. “Laboratory assessment of semi-permeable properties of a natural sodium bentonite.” Can. Geotech. J. 55 (11): 1611–1631. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0599.
Dominijanni, A., N. Guarena, and M. Manassero. 2021. “The role of chemico-osmosis in the performance assessment of bentonite-based contaminant barriers.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1928 (1): 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1928/1/012008.
Dominijanni, A., M. Manassero, and S. Puma. 2013. “Coupled chemical-hydraulic-mechanical behaviour of bentonites.” Géotechnique 63 (3): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.010.
Evans, J. C., C. D. Shackelford, S.-S. Yeo, and J. T. Henning. 2008. “Membrane behavior of soil-bentonite slurry-trench cutoff walls.” Soil Sediment Contamin. Int. J. 17 (4): 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320380802143880.
Fritz, C. J., J. Scalia, C. D. Shackelford, and M. A. Malusis. 2020. “Determining maximum chemico-osmotic pressure difference across clay membranes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (1): 06019018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002196.
Fritz, S. J. 1986. “Ideality of clay membranes in osmotic processes: A review.” Clays Clay Miner. 34 (2): 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1986.0340212.
Henning, J. T., J. C. Evans, and C. D. Shackelford. 2006. “Membrane behavior of two backfills from field-constructed soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (10): 1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:10(1243).
Kang, J. B., and C. D. Shackelford. 2009. “Clay membrane testing using a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions.” Appl. Clay Sci. 44 (1): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.01.006.
Kang, J. B., and C. D. Shackelford. 2010. “Membrane behavior of compacted clay liners.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (10): 1368–1382. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000358.
Kang, J. B., and C. D. Shackelford. 2011. “Consolidation enhanced membrane behavior of a geosynthetic clay liner.” Geotext. Geomembr. 29 (6): 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.07.002.
Katchalsky, A., and P. F. Curran. 2013. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in biophysics. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Keijzer, T. J. S., and J. P. G. Loch. 2001. “Chemical osmosis in compacted dredging sludge.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65 (4): 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541045x.
Kemper, W. D., and D. E. L. Maasland. 1964. “Reduction in salt content of solution on passing through thin films adjacent to charged surfaces.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 28 (3): 318–323. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800030009x.
Kemper, W. D., and J. P. Quirk. 1972. “Ion mobilities and electric charge of external clay surfaces inferred from potential differences and osmotic flow.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 36 (3): 426–433. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1972.03615995003600030019x.
Majhi, A., P. Monash, and G. Pugazhenthi. 2009. “Fabrication and characterization of –clay composite ultrafiltration membrane for the separation of electrolytes from its aqueous solution.” J. Membr. Sci. 340 (1): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.030.
Malusis, M. A., J. B. Kang, and C. D. Shackelford. 2015. “Restricted salt diffusion in a geosynthetic clay liner.” Environ. Geotech. 2 (2): 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00080.
Malusis, M. A., and C. D. Shackelford. 2002a. “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:2(97).
Malusis, M. A., and C. D. Shackelford. 2002b. “Coupling effects during steady-state solute diffusion through a semipermeable clay membrane.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (6): 1312–1319. https://doi.org/10.1021/es011130q.
Malusis, M. A., C. D. Shackelford, and H. W. Olsen. 2001. “A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils.” Geotech. Test. J. 24 (3): 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11343J.
Malusis, M. A., C. D. Shackelford, and H. W. Olsen. 2003. “Flow and transport through clay membrane barriers.” Eng. Geol. 70 (3): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00092-9.
Mazzieri, F., G. Di Emidio, and P. O. Van Impe. 2010. “Diffusion of calcium chloride in a modified bentonite: Impact on osmotic efficiency and hydraulic conductivity.” Clays Clay Miner. 58 (3): 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2010.0580306.
McKelvey, J. G., and I. H. Milne. 1960. “The flow of salt solutions through compacted clay.” Clays Clay Miner. 9 (1): 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1960.0090114.
Meier, A. J., K. M. Sample-Lord, D. Castelbaum, S. Kallase, B. Moran, T. Ray, and C. D. Shackelford. 2014. “Persistence of semipermeable membrane behavior for a geosynthetic clay liner.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Environmental Geotechnics, on Environmental Geotechnics, 496–503. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Meier, A. J., and C. D. Shackelford. 2017. “Membrane behavior of compacted sand–bentonite mixture.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (9): 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0708.
MGMR (Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources the People’s Republic of China). 1993. Specification for physical and chemical properties testing of non-metallic mineral. Beijing: MGMR.
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources the People’s Republic of China). 2007. Standard for engineering classification of soil. Beijing: MWR.
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources the People’s Republic of China). 2019. Standard for geotechnical testing method. Beijing: MWR.
Neuzil, C. E. 2000. “Osmotic generation of ‘anomalous’ fluid pressures in geological environments.” Nature 403 (6766): 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/35003174.
Noy, D. J., S. T. Horseman, J. F. Harrington, P. Bossart, and H. R. Fisch. 2003. “An experimental and modelling study of chemico-osmotic effects in the Opalinus Clay of Switzerland.” In Mont Terri project—Hydrogeological synthesis, osmotic flow. Bern, Switzerland: Federal Office for Water and Geology.
Rousseau-Gueutin, P., J. Gonçalvès, and S. Violette. 2008. “Osmotic efficiency in Callovo-Oxfordian argillites: Experimental vs. theoretical models.” Supplement, Physics and chemistry of the earth, Parts A/B/C 33: S106–S113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.10.064.
Saindon, R., and T. M. Whitworth. 2005. “Hyperfiltration of NaCl solutions using a simulated clay/sand mixture at low compaction pressures.” Aquat. Geochem. 11 (4): 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-005-2041-8.
Sample-Lord, K. M., and C. D. Shackelford. 2018. “Membrane behavior of unsaturated sodium bentonite.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 144 (1): 04017102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001803.
Shackelford, C. D. 2011. “Membrane behavior in geosynthetic clay liners.” In Proc., Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, edited by J. Han and D. Alzamora, 1961–1970. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shackelford, C. D. 2013. “Membrane behavior in engineered bentonite-based containment barriers: State of the art.” In Proc., Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics, edited by M. Manassero, A. Dominijanni, S. Foti, and G. Musso, 45–60. London: Taylor & Francis.
Shackelford, C. D. 2017. “Coupled membrane and diffusion testing of active clays for barrier applications.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Advances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales, edited by A. Ferrari and L. Laloui, 104–111. Berlin: Springer.
Shackelford, C. D., and J. M. Lee. 2003. “The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior.” Clays Clay Miner. 51 (2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2003.0510209.
Shackelford, C. D., N. Lu, M. A. Malusis, and K. M. Sample-Lord. 2019. “Research challenges involving coupled flows in geotechnical engineering.” In Geotechnical fundamentals for addressing new world challenges: Springer series in geomechanics and geoengineering, edited by N. Lu and J. K. Mitchell, 237–274. Berlin: Springer.
Shackelford, C. D., and P. L. Redmond. 1995. “Solute breakthrough curves for processed kaolin at low flow rates.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (1): 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:1(17).
Shackelford, C. D., and J. Scalia. 2016. “Semipermeable membrane behavior in bentonite-based barriers: Past, present, and future.” In Proc., 69th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Richmond, BC: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Takeda, M., and M. Manaka. 2018. “Effects of confining stress on the semipermeability of siliceous mudstones: Implications for identifying geologic membrane behaviors of argillaceous formations.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 (11): 5427–5435. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078591.
Tang, Q. 2013. “Factors affecting waste leachate generation and barrier performance of landfill liners.” Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto Univ.
Tang, Q., T. Katsumi, T. Inui, and Z. Li. 2014. “Membrane behavior of bentonite-amended compacted clay.” Soils Found. 54 (3): 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.019.
Tang, Q., W. Liu, H. Y. Wang, R. Cheng, and Y. F. Qian. 2016. “Membrane behavior of bentonite-amended Fukakusa clay in K, Na and Ca solutions.” J. Central South Univ. 23 (12): 3122–3131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3378-4.
Van Impe, P. O. 2002. “Consolidation, contaminant transport and chemico-osmotic effects in liner materials.” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Ancona.
Wen, Z. 2006. “Physical property of China’s buffer material for high-level radioactive waste repositories.” J. Rock Mech. Eng. 25 (4): 794–800. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.04.014.
Ye, W. M., W. Su, Y. G. Chen, and B. Chen. 2017. “Membrane behavior of compacted GMZ bentonite and its granite mixture.” Environ. Earth Sci. 76 (20): 683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7015-9.
Yeo, S.-S., C. D. Shackelford, and J. C. Evans. 2005. “Membrane behavior of model soil-bentonite backfills.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (4): 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(418).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148 • Issue 10 • October 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 11, 2021
Accepted: May 17, 2022
Published online: Aug 5, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.