Abstract

This study proposes the capacity cumulative absolute velocity (CAVc) as a novel measure for the resistance of granular soils to earthquake-induced liquefaction. The CAVc is defined as the cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) needed to generate a threshold excess pore pressure ratio (ru) value at a specified depth in a layer of liquefiable soil. A probabilistic model for predicting CAVc corresponding to ru values between 0.5 and 1.0 is developed using a database of over 280,000 estimates of CAVc from one-dimensional (1D), nonlinear, effective stress site-response analyses. These models provide CAVc as a function of depth, the presence and location of low-permeability interlayers in the soil profile, and soil stiffness (as reflected in the normalized cone tip resistance from cone penetration test results). The standard deviation around the model’s estimates of CAVc ranges from 0.59 natural log units for an ru threshold of 1.0 to 0.83 natural log units for an ru threshold of 0.5. Correlation models are provided for predicting CAVc throughout the depth of a soil profile, across multiple ru thresholds, or both. Finally, CAVc is implemented in a proposed modification of the liquefaction potential index (LPICAV). The new index is validated using data from three earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, and has a slightly improved predictive capability compared to existing indices, while making use of a relatively predictable intensity measure (i.e., CAV of the outcropping rock motion); this intensity measure is also compatible with performance-based methods for predicting liquefaction consequences. Finally, a guide for model implementation and examples of various applications are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided partly by the US Department of Education (Award no. P200A150042) and partly by the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. This work utilized the Summit supercomputer, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (Awards ACI-1532235 and ACI-1532236), the University of Colorado Boulder, and Colorado State University. The Summit supercomputer is a joint effort of the University of Colorado Boulder and Colorado State University.

References

Baise, L. G., R. B. Higgins, and C. M. Brankman. 2006. “Liquefaction hazard mapping—Statistical and spatial characterization of susceptible units.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (6): 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(705).
Baker, J. W., and B. A. Bradley. 2017. “Intensity measure correlations observed in the NGA-West2 database, and dependence of correlations on rupture and site parameters.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (1): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1193/060716eqs095m.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test–based liquefaction–triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2016. “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2015. PM4Sand (Version 3): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Davis, CA: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis.
Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2017. “6th Ishihara lecture: Simplified procedure for estimating liquefaction-induced building settlement.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 102 (Nov): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.026.
Bullock, Z. 2020. “A framework for performance-based evaluation of liquefaction effects on buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, Z. Karimi, A. Liel, K. Porter, and K. Franke. 2019a. “Probabilistic models for residual and peak transient tilt of mat-founded structures on liquefiable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (2): 04018108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002002.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, A. Liel, K. Porter, Z. Karimi, and B. Bradley. 2017. “Ground-motion prediction equations for Arias intensity, cumulative absolute velocity, and peak incremental ground velocity for rock sites in different tectonic environments.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 107 (5): 2293–2309. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160388.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, A. B. Liel, and K. A. Porter. 2021a. “Can geotechnical liquefaction indices serve as predictors of foundation settlement?” Earthquake Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293021994844.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, A. B. Liel, and K. A. Porter. 2021b. “Site-specific liquefaction fragility analysis: Cloud, stripe, and incremental approaches.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (9): 2529–2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3458.
Bullock, Z., S. Dashti, A. B. Liel, K. A. Porter, and Z. Karimi. 2019b. “Assessment supporting the use of outcropping rock evolutionary intensity measures for prediction of liquefaction consequences.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (4): 1899–1926. https://doi.org/10.1193/041618EQS094M.
Bullock, Z., Z. Karimi, S. Dashti, K. Porter, A. B. Liel, and K. W. Franke. 2019c. “A physics-informed semi-empirical probabilistic model for the settlement of shallow-founded structures on liquefiable ground.” Géotechnique 69 (5): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.174.
Bullock, Z., A. B. Liel, S. Dashti, and K. A. Porter. 2021c. “A suite of ground motion prediction equations for cumulative absolute velocity in shallow crustal earthquakes including epistemic uncertainty.” Earthquake Spectra 37 (2): 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020957342.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2010. “A ground motion prediction equation for the horizontal component of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) based on the PEER-NGA strong motion database.” Earthquake Spectra 26 (3): 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3457158.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2014. “NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2019. “Ground motion models for the horizontal components of Arias intensity (AI) and cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) using the NGA-West2 database.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (3): 1289–1310. https://doi.org/10.1193/090818EQS212M.
Cetin, K. O., A. Der Kiureghian, and R. B. Seed. 2002. “Probabilistic models for the initiation of seismic soil liquefaction.” Struct. Saf. 24 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00036-X.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, R. E. Moss, H. T. Bilge, M. Ilgac, and K. Chowdhury. 2018. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.012.
Chiles, J. P., and P. Delfiner. 2009. Vol. 497 of Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. Van Ballegooy. 2019. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. T. Manzari. 2004. “Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (6): 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622).
Dashti, S., J. D. Bray, J. M. Pestana, M. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010. “Mechanisms of seismically induced settlement of buildings with shallow foundations on liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000179.
Du, W., and G. Wang. 2013. “A simple ground-motion prediction model for cumulative absolute velocity and model validation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (8): 1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2266.
Elgamal, A., Z. Yang, and E. Parra. 2002. “Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (4): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2.
Geyin, M., A. J. Baird, and B. W. Maurer. 2020a. “Field assessment of liquefaction prediction models based on geotechnical versus geospatial data, with lessons for each.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (3): 1386–1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899951.
Geyin, M., B. Maurer, B. A. Bradley, R. Green, and S. van Ballegooy. 2020b. “CPT-based liquefaction case histories resulting from the 2010–2016 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes: A curated digital dataset (version 2).” DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-tygh-ht91.
Geyin, M., and B. W. Maurer. 2020. “Fragility functions for liquefaction-induced ground failure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (12): 04020142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002416.
Geyin, M., B. W. Maurer, B. A. Bradley, R. A. Green, and S. van Ballegooy. 2021. “CPT-based liquefaction case histories compiled from three earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand.” Earthquake Spectra 8755293021996367. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293021996367.
Green, R. A., J. J. Bommer, A. Rodriguez-Marek, B. W. Maurer, P. J. Stafford, B. Edwards, P. P. Kruiver, G. De Lange, and J. Van Elk. 2019. “Addressing limitations in existing ‘simplified’ liquefaction triggering evaluation procedures: Application to induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (8): 4539–4557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0489-3.
Holzer, T. L., and T. L. Youd. 2007. “Liquefaction, ground oscillation, and soil deformation at the Wildlife Array, California.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (3): 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060156.
Hwang, Y. W., J. Ramirez, S. Dashti, P. Kirkwood, A. Liel, G. Camata, and M. Petracca. 2021. “Seismic interaction of adjacent structures on liquefiable soils: Insight from centrifuge and numerical modeling.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (8): 04021063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002546.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Iwasaki, T., T. Arakawa, and K. I. Tokida. 1984. “Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 3 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5.
Kang, G. C., J. W. Chung, and J. D. Rogers. 2014. “Re-calibrating the thresholds for the classification of liquefaction potential index based on the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake.” Eng. Geol. 169 (Feb): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.012.
Karimi, Z., and S. Dashti. 2017. “Ground motion intensity measures to evaluate II: The performance of shallow-founded structures on liquefiable ground.” Earthquake Spectra 33 (1): 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1193/103015eqs163m.
Kayen, R., R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. D. Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity–based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Kokusho, T. 2003. “Current state of research on flow failure considering void redistribution in liquefied deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 23 (7): 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00067-8.
Kramer, S. L., and R. A. Mitchell. 2006. “Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2194970.
Liao, S. S., D. Veneziano, and R. V. Whitman. 1988. “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (4): 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:4(389).
Lilliefors, H. W. 1967. “On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62 (318): 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916.
Liyanapathirana, D. S., and H. G. Poulos. 2004. “Assessment of soil liquefaction incorporating earthquake characteristics.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (11): 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.010.
Malvick, E. J., B. L. Kutter, R. W. Boulanger, and R. Kulasingam. 2006. “Shear localization due to liquefaction-induced void redistribution in a layered infinite slope.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (10): 1293–1303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:10(1293).
Markhvida, M., L. Ceferino, and Y. Baker. 2018. “Modeling spatially correlated spectral accelerations at multiple periods using principal component analysis and geostatistics.” Earthq. Eng. Structur. Dyn. 47 (5): 1107–1123. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3007.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, and O. D. S. Taylor. 2015. “Moving towards an improved index for assessing liquefaction hazard: Lessons from historical data.” Soils Found. 55 (4): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.010.
Maurer, B. W., R. A. Green, S. van Ballegooy, and L. Wotherspoon. 2019. “Development of region-specific soil behavior type index correlations for evaluating liquefaction hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 117 (Feb): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.059.
Maurer, B. W., S. van Ballegooy, and B. A. Bradley. 2017. “Fragility functions for performance-based ground failure due to soil liquefaction.” In Proc., PBD-III: Performance Based Design in Geotechnical Engineering III. Vancouver, BC: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Mayfield, R. T. 2007. “The return period of soil liquefaction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
McKenna, F. 2011. “OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation.” Comput. Sci. Eng. 13 (4): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66.
Moss, R. E., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, and K. Tokimatsu. 2005. “Probabilistic liquefaction triggering based on the cone penetration test.” In Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, 1–13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nakata, T., and K. Shimazaki. 1997. “Geo-slicer, a newly invented soil sampler, for high-resolution active fault studies.” J. Geogr. (Chigaku Zasshi) 106 (1): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.5026/jgeography.106.59.
Olson, S. M., X. Mei, and Y. M. Hashash. 2020. “Nonlinear site response analysis with pore-water pressure generation for liquefaction triggering evaluation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (2): 04019128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002191.
Porter, K. A. 2003. “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, 1–8. New York: International Civil Engineering Risk and Reliability Association.
Raschke, S. A., and R. D. Hryciw. 1997. “Vision cone penetrometer for direct subsurface soil observation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (11): 1074–1076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:11(1074).
Robertson, P. K., and C. E. Wride. 1998. “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J. 35 (3): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-017.
Seed, R. B., et al. 2003. “Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A unified and consistent framework.” In Proc., 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sideras, S. S. 2019. “Evolutionary intensity measures for more accurate and informative evaluation of liquefaction triggering.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Skempton, A. W. 1986. “Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging, and overconsolidation.” Géotechnique 36 (3): 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425.
Takada, K., and B. F. Atwater. 2004. “Evidence for liquefaction identified in peeled slices of Holocene deposits along the lower Columbia river, Washington.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94 (2): 550–575. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020152.
Toprak, S., and T. L. Holzer. 2003. “Liquefaction potential index: Field assessment.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (4): 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(315).
Van Ballegooy, S., P. Malan, V. Lacrosse, M. E. Jacka, M. Cubrinovski, J. D. Bray, T. D. O’Rourke, S. A. Crawford, and H. Cowan. 2014. “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1193/031813EQS070M.
Yang, M., A. R. Barrero, and M. Taiebat. 2020. “Application of a SANISAND model for numerical simulations of the LEAP 2017 experiments.” In Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading, 595–610. Cham, Swizerland: Springer.
Yoshimine, M., H. Nishizaki, K. Amano, and Y. Hosono. 2006. “Flow deformation of liquefied sand under constant shear load and its application to analysis of flow slide of infinite slope.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (2–4): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.016.
Ziotopoulou, K., J. Montgomery, A. M. P. Bastidas, and B. Morales. 2018. “Cyclic strength of Ottawa F-65 sand: Laboratory testing and constitutive model calibration.” In Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics V: Slope stability and landslides, laboratory testing, and in situ testing, 180–189. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: May 13, 2021
Accepted: Oct 5, 2021
Published online: Dec 24, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, 2013, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-425X. Email: [email protected]
Shideh Dashti, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Dr., ECOT 514, Boulder, CO 80309. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Dr., ECOT 517, Boulder, CO 80309. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-5144. Email: [email protected]
Adjoint Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Dr., ECOT 441, Boulder, CO 80309. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-6114. Email: [email protected]
Brett W. Maurer, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, 132H More Hall, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Liquefaction Timing and Post-Triggering Seismic Energy: A Comparison of Crustal and Subduction Zone Earthquakes, Geo-Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485316.026, (240-249), (2024).
  • Energy-Based Liquefaction Triggering Model, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11402, 149, 11, (2023).
  • A deep learning approach for rapid detection of soil liquefaction using time–frequency images, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107788, 166, (107788), (2023).
  • Event-based probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis for defining soil acceptance criteria, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107781, 166, (107781), (2023).
  • Performance-Based Assessment and Design of Structures on Liquefiable Soils: From Triggering to Consequence and Mitigation, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022), 10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_21, (376-396), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share