Abstract

A life-cycle sustainability assessment evaluated and compared the impacts of five ground improvement methods commonly implemented to mitigate liquefaction: compaction grouting, deep dynamic compaction, deep soil mixing, vibro compaction, and vibro replacement (i.e., stone columns). Using typical scopes of work provided by geotechnical contractors who specialize in ground improvement, this study developed sustainability benchmarks for the life-cycle impacts and costs of each method, quantified the consequences of the risk and uncertainty inherent in ground improvement projects, and examined impacts to land and soil resources that occur throughout the life cycle. Results showed that deep soil mixing and compaction grouting are the most impactful and costly methods due to the use of portland cement, an energy- and emissions-intensive material. Vibratory methods and deep dynamic compaction are more sustainable, despite the fact that their impacts and costs are more variable and uncertain. Although many factors influence ground improvement design selection (e.g., safety, performance criteria, feasibility, and cost), the results of this study may help inform decision making to realize more sustainable infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the Engineering Research Center Program of the National Science Foundation (NSF) under NSF Cooperative Agreement EEC-1449501. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NSF. The authors thank Keller North America and Nicholson Construction for providing information on the ground improvement scopes of work described in the paper.

References

Arrigoni, A., D. K. Panesar, M. Duhamel, T. Opher, S. Saxe, I. D. Posen, and H. L. MacLean. 2020. “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of concrete containing supplementary cementitious materials: Cut-off vs. substitution.” J. Cleaner Prod. 263 (Aug): 121465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121465.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for measuring life-cycle costs of buildings and building systems. ASTM E917-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bare, J. C., G. A. Norris, D. W. Pennington, and T. McKone. 2003. “TRACI—The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts.” J. Ind. Ecol. 6 (3–4): 49–78.
Basu, D., A. Misra, and A. J. Puppala. 2015. “Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: Perspectives and review.” Can. Geotech. J. 52 (1): 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0120.
California Air Resources Board. 2010. Staff report: Initial statement of reasons to consider proposed amendments to the regulation for in-use off-road diesel-fueled fleets and the off-road large spark-ignition fleet requirements. Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board.
California Air Resources Board. 2020. “EMFAC Emissions Inventory.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/emissions-inventory.
Clift, R., R. Frischknecht, G. Huppes, A.-M. Tillman, and B. Weidema. 1999. “A summary of the results of the working group on inventory enhancement.” SETAC-Eur. News 10 (3): 14.
da Rocha, C. G., A. Passuello, N. C. Consoli, R. A. Quiñónez Samaniego, and N. M. Kanazawa. 2016. “Life cycle assessment for soil stabilization dosages: A study for the Paraguayan Chaco.” J. Cleaner Prod. 139 (Dec): 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.219.
Das, J. T., R. A. Samuel, A. M. George, S. Chakraborty, T. V. Bheemasetti, and A. J. Puppala. 2018. Establishing a threshold sustainability index for a geotechnical construction, 222–232. Reston, VA: ASCE.
De Laurentiis, V., M. Secchi, U. Bos, R. Horn, A. Laurent, and S. Sala. 2019. “Soil quality index: Exploring options for a comprehensive assessment of land use impacts in LCA.” J. Cleaner Prod. 215 (Apr): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.238.
Egan, D., and B. C. Slocombe. 2010. “Demonstrating environmental benefits of ground improvement.” Ground Improv. 163 (1): 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2010.163.1.63.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1998. Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fragaszy, R. J., et al. 2011. “Sustainable development and energy geotechnology—Potential roles for geotechnical engineering.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 15 (4): 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0102-7.
Gursel, A. P. 2014. Life-cycle assessment of concrete: Decision-support tool and case study application. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Hammond, G., and C. Jones. 2011. Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). Bath, UK: Univ. of Bath.
Harbottle, M. J., A. Al-Tabbaa, and C. W. Evans. 2007. “A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill.” J. Hazard. Mater. 141 (2): 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.084.
Holt, D. G. A., I. Jefferson, P. A. Braithwaite, and D. N. Chapman. 2010. “Sustainable geotechnical design.” In GeoFlorida 2010, 2925–2932. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Horn, R., and S. Maier. 2018. “Updated characterization factors (Version 2.5).” Accessed August 1, 2020. http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-379310.html.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Monograph MNO-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
ISO. 2006a. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2006b. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2017. Buildings and constructed assets—Service life planning—Part 5: Life-cycle costing. ISO 15686-5:2017. Geneva: ISO.
IWG (Interagency Working Group) on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. 2016. Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Jefferson, I., M. Gaterell, A. M. Thomas, and C. J. Serridge. 2010. “Emissions assessment related to vibro stone columns.” Ground Improv. 163 (1): 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2010.163.1.71.
Keller North America. 2020. “Solutions matrix: The solution to any geotechnical challenge.” August 1, 2020. https://www.keller-na.com/sites/keller-na/files/2020-01/keller-solutions-matrix.pdf.
Laurent, A., B. P. Weidema, J. Bare, X. Liao, D. Maia de Souza, M. Pizzol, S. Sala, H. Schreiber, N. Thonemann, and F. Verones. 2020. “Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase.” J. Ind. Ecol. 24 (5): 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13012.
Lehne, J., and F. Preston. 2018. Making concrete change: Innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete. London: Chatham House.
Marten, A. L., E. A. Kopits, C. W. Griffiths, S. C. Newbold, and A. Wolverton. 2015a. “Corrigendum to: Incremental CH4 and N2O mitigation benefits consistent with the U.S. Government’s SCCO2 estimates.” Clim. Policy 15 (5): 678–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1070550.
Marten, A. L., E. A. Kopits, C. W. Griffiths, S. C. Newbold, and A. Wolverton. 2015b. “Incremental CH4 and N2O mitigation benefits consistent with the US Government’s SCCO2 estimates.” Clim. Policy 15 (2): 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.912981.
Martin Marietta. 2017. “Environmental product declaration.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.astm.org/CERTIFICATION/DOCS/359.EPD_for_Martin_Marietta_EPD_final.pdf.
Miller, S. A. 2018. “Supplementary cementitious materials to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from concrete: Can there be too much of a good thing?” J. Cleaner Prod. 178 (Mar): 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.008.
Mitchell, J. K. 2008. “Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands.” In From research to practice in geotechnical engineering, 433–451. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mitchell, J. K., and R. Kelly. 2013. “Addressing some current challenges in ground improvement.” Ground Improv. 166 (3): 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.12.00030.
Myhre, G., et al. 2013. “Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing.” In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P. M. Midgley. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neugebauer, S., J. Martinez-Blanco, R. Scheumann, and M. Finkbeiner. 2015. “Enhancing the practical implementation of life cycle sustainability assessment–proposal of a Tiered approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 102 (Sep): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.053.
Parker, M., and D. Steenkamp. 2012. “The economic impact of the Canterbury earthquakes.” Reserve Bank N. Z. Bull. 75 (3): 13–25.
Polaris Materials. 2017. “Environmental product declaration.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.astm.org/CERTIFICATION/DOCS/344.EPD_Polaris_Materials_final.pdf.
Purdy, C. M., A. J. Raymond, J. T. DeJong, A. Kendall, and C. Krage. 2020. Life cycle sustainability assessment of geotechnical site investigation. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Raymond, A. J., J. R. Tipton, A. Kendall, and J. T. DeJong. 2020. “Review of impact categories and environmental indicators for life cycle assessment of geotechnical systems.” J. Ind. Ecol. 24 (3): 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12946.
Schaefer, V. R., J. K. Mitchell, R. R. Berg, G. M. Filz, and S. C. Douglas. 2012. “Ground improvement in the 21st Century: A comprehensive web-based information system.” In Geotechnical engineering state of the art and practice, 272–293. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, and J. E. Dove. 2014. “Assessing environmental impacts in geotechnical construction: Insights from the fuel cycle.” In Geo-Congress 2014, 3516–3525. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, and J. E. Dove. 2016a. “Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. I: Definitions and background.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001410.
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, and J. E. Dove. 2016b. “Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works. II: Working model and example.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (3): 04015084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001411.
Shillaber, C. M., J. K. Mitchell, J. E. Dove, and Z. A. Ostrum. 2017. “Framework to account for uncertainty in energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (5): 04016122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001649.
Spaulding, C., F. Masse, and J. LaBrozzi. 2008. “Ground improvement technologies for a sustainable world.” In Geo-Congress 2008, 891–898. Reston, VA: ASCE.
sphera. 2020. “GaBi databases 2020 edition upgrades & improvements.” Accessed August 1, 2020. http://www.gabi-software.com/fileadmin/GaBi_Databases/Database_Upgrade_2020_Upgrades_and_improvements.pdf.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2020. Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organizations 2020. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
United Nations. 2015. “The 17 Goals.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2016. “CPI inflation calculator.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
USEPA. 2004. Exhaust and crankcase emission factors for nonroad engine modeling—Compression-ignition. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 2017. “The social cost of carbon: Estimating the benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climatechange/social-cost-carbon_.html.
Venkatesh, G. 2019. “Critique of selected peer-reviewed publications on applied social life cycle assessment: Focus on cases from developing countries.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 21 (2): 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1644-x.
Vulcan Materials. 2016. “Environmental product declaration.” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.astm.org/CERTIFICATION/DOCS/371.EPD_for_VMC_EPD_Pleasanton_final.pdf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Oct 15, 2020
Accepted: Jun 21, 2021
Published online: Oct 4, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 4, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616; Senior Staff Engineer, Geosyntec Consultants, 803 2nd St., Suite D, Davis, CA 95616. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-8693. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-955X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1964-9080. Email: [email protected]
J. Tanner Blackburn, M.ASCE [email protected]
Vice President of Engineering, Keller North America, 7550 Teague Rd., Suite 300, Hanover, MD 21076. Email: [email protected]
Rick Deschamps, M.ASCE [email protected]
Vice President of Engineering, Nicholson Construction, 2400 Ansys Dr., Suite 303, Canonsburg, PA 15329. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Sustainability and Resilience Assessment of a Reinforced Concrete Bridge Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11332, 150, 4, (2024).
  • Review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Evaluation of Geotechnical Systems, Geo-Congress 2023, 10.1061/9780784484661.061, (583-592), (2023).
  • A spreadsheet-based decision support system for selection of optimal soil liquefaction mitigation technique, Decision Analytics Journal, 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100154, 6, (100154), (2023).
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Drilled Shafts, DFI Journal The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute, 10.37308/DFIJnl.20211026.245, 16, 2, (1-24), (2022).
  • Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Tool for Civil Engineering Research Prioritization and Project Decision Making, Sustainable Geo-Technologies for Climate Change Adaptation, 10.1007/978-981-19-4074-3_11, (175-184), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share