Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2021

Centrifuge Modeling and DIC of Dynamic Compaction on Sandy Soils with Shallow Water Table

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 6

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of dynamic compaction (DC) on sandy soils with shallow groundwater table in a geotechnical centrifuge. A total of five model tests were conducted on two different soils with fines contents of 0% and 10%, with water and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) as pore fluids. All models were tested at 30 gravities using the 4.5-m radius large beam centrifuge facility available at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, India. A custom designed and developed in-flight actuator was used in the study, and a tamping energy level of 208 t-m was simulated to replicate the field DC process. The results were interpreted in terms of pore pressure developments and ground vibrations induced during tamper blows by analyzing instrumentation data recorded by pore pressure transducers and accelerometers. Furthermore, digital image cross-correlation (DIC) analysis was applied on photographs of the front elevation of the models captured during the centrifuge tests, and corresponding crater formations, displacement vectors, contours of displacement, and volumetric strains were plotted for quantitative assessment of ground improvement induced by DC. The effectiveness of pore fluid substitution in dynamic centrifuge modeling was investigated in the context of DC using water and HPMC pore fluids. It was observed that the performance of DC on sandy soil without fines was independent of pore fluid type. However, in the case of silty sand with 10% fines, pore pressure developments were found to be significantly different with and without HPMC, indicating the importance of viscous pore fluid substitution for modeling DC on low-permeability soils in centrifuges. For effective application of DC on soils with permeability on the order of 5×105  m/s or less, tamping should be executed in passes in order to dissipate excess pore water pressure induced by DC.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings or were used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of the National Geotechnical Centrifuge Facility and of the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India, for their support throughout the study. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their critical review in improving the quality of the manuscript.

References

Adamidis, O., and G. S. P. Madabhushi. 2015. “Use of viscous pore fluids in dynamic centrifuge modelling.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 15 (3): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.14.00022.
Arslan, H., G. Baykal, and O. Ertas. 2007. “Influence of tamper weight shape on dynamic compaction.” Ground Improv. 11 (2): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2007.11.2.61.
Bhattacherjee, D., and B. V. S. Viswanadham. 2019. “Centrifuge model studies on performance of hybrid geosynthetic-reinforced slopes with poorly draining soil subjected to rainfall.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (12): 04019108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002168.
Bo, M. W., Y. M. Na, A. Arulrajah, and M. F. Chang. 2009. “Densification of granular soil by dynamic compaction.” Ground Improv. 162 (3): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2009.162.3.121.
BSI (British Standard Institute). 1993. Evaluation and measurement for vibrations in buildings–Part 2: Guide to damage levels from groundborne vibrations. Milton Keynes, UK: BSI.
Chandrasekaran, V. S. 2001. “Numerical and centrifuge modelling in soil structure interaction.” Indian Geotech. J. 31 (1): 30–59.
Charles, J. A., D. Burford, and K. S. Watts. 1981. “Field studies of the effectiveness of dynamic consolidation.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 617–622. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A Balkema.
Chow, Y. K., D. M. Youg, K. Y. Yong, and S. L. Lee. 1994. “Dynamic compaction of loose granular soils: Effect of print spacing.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (7): 1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1115).
Dewoolkar, M. M., H. Y. Ko, A. T. Stadler, and S. M. F. Astaneh. 1999. “A substitute pore fluid for seismic centrifuge modeling.” Geotech. Test. J. 22 (3): 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11111J.
DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung). 1999. Structural vibrations—Part 3: Effects of vibration on structures. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normung.
Divya, P. V., B. V. S. Viswanadham, and J. P. Gourc. 2017. “Centrifuge modeling and digital image cross-correlation analysis of geofiber-reinforced clay-based landfill covers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (1): 04016076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001563.
Feng, S. J., W. H. Shui, K. Tan, L. Y. Gao, and L. J. He. 2011. “Field evaluation of dynamic compaction on granular deposits.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (3): 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000160.
Feng, T. W., K. H. Chen, Y. T. Su, and Y. C. Shi. 2000. “Laboratory investigation of efficiency of conical-based pounders for dynamic compaction.” Géotechnique 50 (6): 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.6.667.
Ghassemi, A., A. Pak, and H. Shahir. 2010. “Numerical study of the coupled hydro-mechanical effects in dynamic compaction of saturated granular soils.” Comput. Geotech. 37 (1): 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.06.009.
Gu, Q., and F. H. Lee. 2002. “Ground response to dynamic compaction of dry sand.” Géotechnique 52 (7): 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.7.481.
Hajialilue-Bonab, M., and A. H. Rezaei. 2009. “Physical modelling of low-energy dynamic compaction.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 9 (3): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2009.090302.
Hajialilue-Bonab, M., and F. S. Zare. 2014. “Investigation on tamping spacing in dynamic compaction using model tests.” Ground Improv. 167 (3): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.12.00018.
ISO. 1990. Mechanical vibration and shock—Vibration of buildings—Guidelines for the measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on buildings. Geneva: ISO.
Kundu, S., and B. V. S. Viswanadham. 2018. “Numerical studies on the effectiveness of dynamic compaction using shear wave velocity profiling.” Indian Geotech. J. 48 (2): 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0298-2.
Kundu, S., and B. V. S. Viswanadham. 2020. “Numerical modelling of dynamic compaction induced settlement of MSW landfills.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (8): 04020125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001754.
Kundu, S., and B. V. S. Viswanadham. 2021. “Design and development of an in-flight actuator for modelling dynamic compaction in a geotechnical centrifuge.” Geotech. Test. J. 44 (4): 28. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20190169.
Lee, F. H., and Q. Gu. 2004. “Method for estimating dynamic compaction effect on sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (2): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(139).
Ling, H. I., Y. Mohri, T. Kawabata, H. Liu, C. Burke, and L. Sun. 2003. “Centrifugal modeling of seismic behavior of large-diameter pipe in liquefiable soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1092).
Lukas, R. G. 1986. Dynamic compaction for highway construction. Vol. 1: Design and construction guidelines. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Lutenegger, A. J. 1986. “Dynamic compaction in friable loess.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 112 (6): 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:6(663).
Madhusudhan, B. N., and J. Kumar. 2013. “Damping of sands for varying saturation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (9): 1625–1630. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000895.
Mayne, P. W., and J. S. Jones. 1983. “Impact stress during dynamic compaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. 109 (10): 1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:10(1342).
Mayne, P. W., J. S. Jones, and D. C. E’Dinas. 1984. “Ground response to dynamic compaction.” J. Geotech. Eng. 110 (6): 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:6(757).
Menard, L., and Y. Broise. 1975. “Theoretical and practical aspects of dynamic consolidation.” Géotechnique 25 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.3.
Merrifield, C. M., and M. C. R. Davies. 2000. “A study of low-energy dynamic compaction: Field trials and centrifuge modeling.” Géotechnique 50 (6): 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.6.675.
Okamura, M., and T. Inoue. 2012. “Preparation of fully saturated models for liquefaction study.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 12 (1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2012.12.1.39.
Oshima, A., and N. Takada. 1998. “Evaluation of compacted area of heavy tamping by cone point resistance.” In Proc., Centrifuge’98, 813–818. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Parvizi, M. 2009. “Soil response to surface impacts loads during low energy dynamic compaction.” J. Appl. Sci. 9 (11): 2088–2096. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.2088.2096.
Puppala, A. J., B. Katha, and L. R. Hoyos. 2004. “Volumetric shrinkage strain measurements in expansive soils using digital imaging technology.” Geotech. Test. J. 27 (6): 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ12069.
Rollins, K. M., and J. Kim. 2010. “Dynamic compaction of collapsible soils based on U.S. case histories.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (9): 1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000331.
Rollins, K. M., and G. W. Rogers. 1994. “Mitigation measures for small structures on collapsible soils.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (9): 1533–1553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:9(1533).
Schofield, A. N. 1980. “Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations.” Géotechnique 30 (3): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227.
Siskind D. E., M. S. Stagg, J. W. Kopp, and C. H. Dowding. 1980. Structure response and damage produced by ground vibrations from surface blasting. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Mines.
SN (Swiss Standards). 1992. Schweizerische Normen-Vereinigung, Les ébranlements - Effect des ebranlements sur les construction (Swiss Standard on vibration effects on buildings). [In Swiss.] SN-640312a. Zürich, Switzerland: SN.
Stewart, D. P., Y. R. Chen, and B. L. Kutter. 1998. “Experience with the use of methylcellulose as a viscous pore fluid in centrifuge models.” Geotech. Test. J. 21 (4): 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11376J.
Sze, H. Y., and J. Yang. 2014. “Failure modes of sand in undrained cyclic loading: Impact of sample preparation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140 (1): 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000971.
Thusyanthan, N. I., W. A. Take, S. P. G. Madabhushi, and M. D. Bolton. 2007. “Crack initiation in clay observed in beam bending.” Géotechnique 57 (7): 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.7.581.
Viswanadham, B. V. S., and D. König. 2009. “Centrifuge modeling of geotextile-reinforced slopes subjected to differential settlements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 27 (2): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.008.
White, D. J., W. A. Take, and M. D. Bolton. 2003. “Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry.” Géotechnique 53 (7): 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.7.619.
Wilson, D. W., R. W. Boulanger, and B. L. Kutter. 2000. “Observed seismic lateral resistance of liquefying sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (10): 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:10(898).
Zekkos, D., M. Kabalan, and M. Flanagan. 2013. “Lessons learned from case histories of dynamic compaction at municipal solid waste sites.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 39 (5): 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000804.
Zeng, X., J. Wu, and B. A. Young. 1998. “Influence of viscous fluids on properties of sand.” Geotech. Test. J. 21 (l): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10424J.
Zou, W. L., Z. Wang, and Z. F. Yao. 2005. “Effect of dynamic compaction on placement of high-road embankment.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 19 (4): 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(316).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: May 18, 2020
Accepted: Jan 25, 2021
Published online: Apr 12, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Saptarshi Kundu [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-8616. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share