Free access
Corrections
Dec 11, 2020

Erratum for “Procedure for Estimating Shear-Induced Seismic Slope Displacement for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes” by Jonathan D. Bray and Jorge Macedo

You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLE
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 2
The authors would like to correct values of the some of the coefficients and values presented in the original paper. These corrections are as follows:
In Eq. (5), the coefficient of Mw should be 0.01, c1=6.951 if Ts0.10  s and c1=6.724 if Ts<0.10  s when PGV150  cm/s, and c1=1.764 if Ts0.10  s and c1=1.991 if Ts<0.10  s when PGV>150  cm/s.
In Eq. (7), c1=0.148 if Ts<0.10  s when PGV>150  cm/s.
In Table 1, PGV=103  cm/s based on a nearby recording for the evaluation of the Sunshine Canyon landfill (LF).
In the “Illustrative Example” section, the seismic coefficient corresponding to 30  cm of seismic slope displacement at the 16% exceedance level is 0.09.
Accordingly, Eq. (5) for estimating D100 for near-fault pulse ground motions is revised to be
Ln(D100)=c12.632Ln(ky)0.278(Ln(ky))2+0.527Ln(ky)Ln(Sa(1.3Ts))+1.978Ln(Sa(1.3Ts))0.233(Ln(Sa(1.3Ts)))2+c2Ts+c3(Ts)2+0.01Mw+c4×Ln(PGV)±ε
(5)
where ε = normally distributed random variable with zero mean and standard deviation σ=0.56. The coefficient of Mw should be 0.01. When 60  cm/s<PGV150  cm/s, c1=6.951, c2=1.069, c3=0.498, and c4=1.547 if Ts0.10  s, and c1=6.724, c2=2.744, c3=0.0, and c4=1.547 if Ts<0.10  s. When PGV>150  cm/s, c1=1.764, c2=1.069, c3=0.498, and c4=0.097 if Ts0.10  s, and c1=1.991, c2=2.744, c3=0.0, and c4=0.097 if Ts<0.10  s.
Eq. (7) for estimating D50 for near-fault pulse ground motions is revised to be
Ln(D50)=c12.931Ln(ky)0.319(Ln(ky))2+0.584Ln(ky)Ln(Sa(1.3Ts))+2.261Ln(Sa(1.3Ts))0.241(Ln(Sa(1.3Ts)))2+c2Ts+c3(Ts)2+0.05Mw+c4×Ln(PGV)±ε
(7)
where ε = normally distributed random variable with zero mean and standard deviation σ=0.54. When 60  cm/s<PGV150  cm/s, c1=7.718, c2=1.031, c3=0.480, and c4=1.458 if Ts0.10  s, and c1=7.497, c2=2.731, c3=0.0, and c4=1.458 if Ts<0.10  s. If PGV>150  cm/s, c1=0.369, c2=1.031, c3=0.480, and c4=0.025 if Ts0.10  s, and c1=0.148, c2=2.731, c3=0.0, and c4=0.025 if Ts<0.10  s.
The results calculated with the procedure in the original paper do not change appreciably when the correct coefficients are used. The original procedure with corrected coefficients is provided in the form of a spreadsheet for use in engineering practice (Bray and Macedo 2020).

References

Bray, J. D., and J. Macedo. 2020. “Simplified seismic slope stability excel spreadsheets.” Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.ce.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/bray/research.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 147Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Aug 24, 2020
Accepted: Oct 21, 2020
Published online: Dec 11, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: May 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-4365. Email: [email protected]
Jorge Macedo, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share