Technical Papers
Aug 20, 2020

Undrained Dynamic Response of Partially Saturated Sands Tested in a DSS-C Device

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 11

Abstract

Liquefaction-induced seismic vulnerability is still a major problem in geotechnical engineering applications. To address this issue, various liquefaction mitigation techniques have been proposed to reduce the excess pore water pressures and liquefaction-induced deformations. Recently, the induced partial saturation (IPS) method, by which the fully saturated condition in loose sands is altered to be partially saturated, was proposed. In the present research, undrained cyclic strain-controlled tests were performed on partially saturated sand specimens with degrees of saturation (S) of 70%–89% and relative densities (Dr) of 21%–43% in a dynamic simple shear device with confining pressure (DSS-C) at effective stresses and back pressures ranging from 50 to 200 kPa and under cyclic simple shear strain amplitudes (γ) of 0.1%–0.4%. Various specimen preparation techniques were explored, and the best specimen preparation method was determined to be wet pluviation of dry sand into a water-sodium percarbonate mixture to obtain loose, undeformed, partially saturated sand specimens at various degrees of saturation. The test results showed that as the degree of saturation decreases, the generation of excess pore water pressure ratios (ru) also decreases significantly, especially under conditions of higher effective stresses. The ru values in partially saturated sand specimens decrease as the effective stress increases. However, ru increases as the backpressure increases. The back pressure has a significant effect on ru generation in partially saturated sands, unlike in fully saturated sand tests; the true liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand samples should be investigated under the coupled effects of effective stress and back pressure, which is equivalent to the initial pore water pressure in the field. According to the test results, the beneficial effect of effective stress on liquefaction resistance is more prominent than the detrimental effect of back pressures; therefore, we have concluded that once IPS is implemented in the field, the degree of saturation can be reduced to lower values at shallower depths.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) under the Grant No. 213M367 and project title of “Dynamic Response of Sands Mitigated by IPS (Induced Partial Saturation) under New and Existing Structures.”

References

ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of cohesive soils (withdrawn 2016). ASTM D6528. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Dobry, R. 1985. Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on Earthquake Engineering.
Eseller-Bayat, E., M. Yegian, A. Alshawabkeh, and S. Gokyer. 2013. “Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands. I: Experimental results.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (6): 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000815.
Gokyer, S. 2015. “Numerical simulation of partial saturation in sands induced by flow and chemical reactivity.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ.
Gulen, D. B. 2017. “Undrained dynamic response of fully and partially saturated sands through dynamic simple shear test device with confined pressure.” Master of Science thesis, Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ.
Gulen, D. B., and E. E. Eseller-Bayat. 2017. “Specimen preparation techniques for testing fully and partially saturated sands in dynamic simple shear (DSS) test device with confining pressure.” In Advances in laboratory testing and modelling of soils and shales (ATMSS), edited by A. Ferrari and L. Laloui. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Gulen, D. B., and E. E. Eseller-Bayat. 2019. “Liquefaction responses of specimens prepared by IPS tested in DSS-C and shaking table.” In Vol. 4 of Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, ICEGE 2019, edited by F. Silvestri and N. Moraci, 2748–2755. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
He, J., J. Chu, and V. Ivanov. 2013. “Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas.” Géotechnique 63 (4): 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.004.
Kamata, T., Y. Tsukamoto, and K. Ishihara. 2009. “Undrained shear strength of partially saturated sand in triaxial tests.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 42 (1): 57–62. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.1.57-62.
Kazemiroodsari, H. 2016. “Electric conductivity for laboratory and field monitoring of induced partial saturation (IPS) in sands.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ.
Marasini, N., and M. Okamura. 2015. “Air injection to mitigate liquefaction under light structures.” Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. 15 (3): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.14.00005.
Nababan, F. R. P. 2015. “Development and evaluation of induced partial saturation (IPS), delivery method and its implementation in large laboratory specimens and in the field.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern Univ.
Nagao, K., Y. Azegami, S. Yamada, N. Suemasa, and T. Katada. 2007. “A micro-bubble injection method for a countermeasure against liquefaction.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 25–28. Thessaloniki, Greece: Springer.
O’Donnell, S. T., B. E. Rittmann, and E. Kavazanjian, Jr. 2017. “MIDP: Liquefaction mitigation via microbial denitrification as a two-stage process. I: Desaturation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (12): 04017094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001818.
Okamura, M., and Y. Soga. 2006. “Effects of pore fluid compression on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand.” Soils Found. 46 (5): 695–700. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.695.
Okamura, M., M. Takebayashi, K. Nishida, N. Fujii, M. Jinguji, T. Imasato, H. Yasuhara, and E. Nakagawa. 2011. “In-situ desaturation test by air injection and its evaluation through field monitoring and multiphase flow simulation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (7): 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000483.
Okamura, M., and T. Teraoka. 2005. “Shaking table tests to investigate soil desaturation as a liquefaction countermeasure.” In Seismic performance and simulation of pile foundations in liquefied and laterally spreading ground, 282–293. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40822(184)23.
Rebata-Landa, V., and J. C. Santamarina. 2012. “Mechanical effects of biogenic nitrogen gas bubbles in soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (2): 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000571.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1967. “Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 93 (3): 83–108.
Takemura, J., R. Igarashi, J. Izawa, M. Okamura, and M. Masuda. 2009. “Centrifuge model tests on soil desaturation as a liquefaction countermeasure.” In Proc., 17th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 502–505. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-502.
Yasuhara, H., M. Okamura, and Y. Kochi. 2008. “Experiments and predictions of soil desaturation by air-injection technique and the implications mediated by multiphase flow simulation.” Soils Found. 48 (6): 791–804. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.791.
Yegian, M. K., E. Eseller-Bayat, A. Alshawabkeh, and S. Ali. 2007. “Induced partial saturation (IPS) for liquefaction mitigation: Experimental investigation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(372).
Zeybek, A., and S. P. G. Madabhushi. 2017. “Centrifuge testing to evaluate the liquefaction response of air-injected partially saturated soils beneath shallow foundations.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (1): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9968-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 11November 2020

History

Received: May 1, 2019
Accepted: May 26, 2020
Published online: Aug 20, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

E. Ece Eseller-Bayat, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-4911 [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Istanbul 34469, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-4911. Email: [email protected]
Derya Burcu Gulen, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK; formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical Univ., Istanbul 34469, Turkey.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share