Comparison of Laboratory and Field Measurements of Backfill Hydraulic Conductivity for a Large-Scale Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 8
Abstract
Soil-bentonite (SB) cutoff walls are commonly employed to control groundwater flow and contaminant migration, and the hydraulic conductivity () of the SB backfill is a critical parameter in these applications. In this study, an evaluation of backfill was conducted for a large-scale SB cutoff wall (approximately 200 m long and 7 m deep) constructed and instrumented for field research. Measurements of (more than 150 in total) were obtained via (1) laboratory (flexible-wall and rigid-wall) tests on specimens molded from surface grab samples of the field-mixed backfill collected during construction, (2) laboratory (flexible-wall) tests on undisturbed backfill specimens prepared from Shelby tube samples taken from the wall, and (3) in situ (slug) tests conducted at 12 different locations within the wall. The laboratory tests were conducted in stages over a range of applied effective stresses (, 13.8, 20.7, and 34.5 kPa) that encompassed the range of mean in situ effective stresses measured in the backfill (6–12 kPa) via embedded earth pressure and pore pressure sensors. At a given , flexible-wall values for the undisturbed specimens were similar to those for the laboratory molded specimens. However, decreased with increasing in all of the laboratory tests, as expected, and the differences between values measured at the lower stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) and those measured at the higher stresses (20.7–34.8 kPa) were statistically significant. The flexible-wall tests underestimated relative to the slug tests, but the differences generally were small (on average, within a factor of 2) when considering only the flexible-wall specimens tested at the lower applied stresses (6.9–13.8 kPa) that more closely matched the in situ stresses. The results demonstrate the importance of conducting laboratory tests on SB backfill at stresses representative of the in situ stresses, which are limited by frictional load transfer along the sidewalls and tend to be lower than expected based on an assumed geostatic stress distribution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Grant No. 1463198. The opinions and recommendations provided in this paper are solely those of the authors and are not necessarily consistent with the policies of NSF. The authors gratefully acknowledge Central Builders Supply (Montandon, Pennsylvania), CETCO (Hoffman Estates, Illinois), and Geo-Solutions, Inc. (New Kensington, Pennsylvania) for the time, resources, and materials given to this study. Financial assistance also was provided by Michael and Laureen Costa. The authors thank Bucknell undergraduate students Nancy Ingabire Abayo and Brianna Lewis for their assistance with the field and laboratory work. Finally, this research would not have been possible without invaluable contributions from James Gutelius, Bucknell Director of Civil Engineering Laboratories.
References
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-63. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM C143-15a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM D5084-16a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Barlow, L. C. 2018. “Experimental study of hydraulic conductivity of a soil-bentonite cutoff wall.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell Univ.
Barlow, L. C., and M. A. Malusis. 2018. “Assessment of backfill hydraulic conductivity in an instrumented soil-bentonite cutoff wall.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 8th Int. Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 291–299. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2224-2_36.
Bouwer, H., and R. C. Rice. 1976. “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00423.
Britton, J. P., G. M. Filz, and W. E. Herring. 2004. “Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of soil–bentonite backfill.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (12): 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1250).
Britton, J. P., G. M. Filz, and W. E. Herring. 2005. “Slug test in soil-bentonite cutoff walls using a push-in piezometer tip.” In Geo-Frontiers 2005: Waste Containment and Remediation, Geotechnical Special Publication 142, edited by A. Alshawabkeh, C. H. Benson, P. J. Culligan, J. C. Evans, B. A. Gross, D. Narejo, K. R. Reddy, C. D. Shackelford, and J. G. Zornberg, 130–142. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40789(168)42.
Choi, H., and D. E. Daniel. 2006. “Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I: Analysis methods.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (4): 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(429).
Evans, J. C. 2007. “The TRD method: Slag-cement materials for in-situ mixed vertical barriers.” In Geo-Denver 2007: Soil Improvement, Geotechnical Special Publication 172, edited by V. R. Schaefer, G. M. Filz, P. M. Gallagher, A. L. Sehn, and K. J. Wissmann, 1–11. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40916(235)11.
Evans, J. C., M. Costa, and B. Cooley. 1995. “The state-of-stress in soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff walls.” In Vol. 46 of Proc., Geoenvironment 2000: Characterization, Containment, Remediation, and Performance in Environmental Geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication, 1173–1193. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Evans, J. C., and D. Ruffing. 2019. “Stresses in soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2019, 8th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, 177–184. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482148.018.
Evans, J. C., and C. R. Ryan. 2005. “Time-dependent strength behavior of soil-bentonite slurry wall backfill.” In Geo-Frontiers 2005: Waste Containment and Remediation, Geotechnical Special Publication 142, edited by A. Alshawabkeh, C. H. Benson, P. J. Culligan, J. C. Evans, B. A. Gross, D. Narejo, K. R. Reddy, C. D. Shackelford, and J. G. Zornberg. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40789(168)45.
Filz, G. M. 1996. “Consolidation stresses in soil-bentonite back-filled trenches.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, edited by M. Kamon, 497–502. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Filz, G. M., D. Y. Baxter, D. J. Bentler, and R. R. Davidson. 1999. “Ground deformations adjacent to a soil-bentonite cutoff wall.” In Vol. 90 of Proc., Geo-Engineering for Underground Facilities, Geotechnical Special Publication, 121–139. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hvorslev, M. J. 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Vicksburg, MS: USACE.
Lim, J., D. Lee, V. A. Zlotnik, and H. Choi. 2014. “Analytical interpretation of slug test in a vertical cutoff wall.” Ground Water 52 (2): 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12033.
Malusis, M. A., E. J. Barben, and J. C. Evans. 2009. “Hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of soil-bentonite backfill amended with activated carbon.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (5): 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000041.
Malusis, M. A., J. Evans, R. Jacob, D. Ruffing, L. Barlow, and A. Marchiori. 2017. “Construction and monitoring of an instrumented soil-bentonite cutoff wall: Field research case study.” In Proc., 29th Central Pennsylvania Geotechnical Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Malusis, M. A., and M. D. McKeehan. 2013. “Chemical compatibility of model soil-bentonite backfill containing multiswellable bentonite.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (2): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000729.
Malusis, M. A., S. Yeom, and J. C. Evans. 2011. “Hydraulic conductivity of model soil-bentonite backfills subjected to wet-dry cycling.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (8): 1198–1211. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-028.
Marchiori, A., Y. Li, and J. Evans. 2019. “Design and evaluation of IoT-enabled instrumentation for a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall.” Infrastructures 4 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4010005.
Millet, R. A., J. Y. Perez, and R. R. Davidson. 1992. “USA practice slurry wall specifications 10 years later.” In Slurry walls: Design, construction, and quality control, edited by D. B. Paul, R. R. Davidson, and N. J. Cavalli, 42–68. Philadelphia: ASTM.
National Research Council. 2007. Assessing the performance of surface and subsurface engineered barriers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Opdyke, S. M., and J. C. Evans. 2005. “Slag-cement-bentonite slurry walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (6): 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(673).
Ruffing, D. G. 2009. “A reevaluation of the state of stress in soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” M.S. thesis, Bucknell Univ.
Ruffing, D. G., and J. C. Evans. 2010. “In situ evaluation of a shallow soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall.” In Proc., 6th Int. Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 758–763. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Ruffing, D. G., J. C. Evans, and M. A. Malusis. 2010. “Prediction of earth pressures in soil-bentonite cutoff walls.” In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling, and Design, Geotechnical Special Publication 199, edited by D. O. Fratta, A. J. Puppala, and B. Muhunthan, 2416–2425. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41095(365)245.
Ruffing, D. G., J. C. Evans, and M. A. Malusis. 2011. “Evaluations of lateral earth pressure in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall.” In Proc., 14th Pan-American Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Richmond, BC: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Ruffing, D. G., J. C. Evans, and M. A. Malusis. 2012. “Long term in situ measurements of the volumetric water content in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall.” In GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication 225, edited by R. D. Hryciw, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and N. Yesiller, 3429–3436. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412121.351.
Zlotnik, V. A., D. Goss, and G. M. Duffield. 2010. “General steady-state shape factor for a partially penetrating well.” Ground Water 48 (1): 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00621.x.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146 • Issue 8 • August 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 28, 2019
Accepted: Mar 11, 2020
Published online: Jun 13, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 13, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.