Technical Papers
Apr 18, 2020

Global versus Local Simulation of Geotechnical Parameters for Tunneling Projects

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

Urban soft-ground tunneling projects involve significant risks related to the spatial variability and uncertainty in geotechnical parameters. However, standard practice typically does not incorporate spatial trends into risk assessment. Geostatistical methods provide a means not only for predicting geotechnical parameter values spatially, but also for modeling the heterogeneity and spatial uncertainty that play a key role in probabilistic risk assessment for tunnel construction. Before incorporating geostatistical analysis into the risk assessment for soft-ground tunneling works, it is necessary to identify best practices with respect to geostatistical methods. In this paper, two approaches were examined and compared for modeling the spatial variability and uncertainty of key geotechnical parameters relevant to shield tunneling in soils. The first approach consisted of the sequential Gaussian simulation of parameters using a single spatial variance model for each respective parameter, which is a common approach adopted in the literature but does not incorporate variability and uncertainty in geological units. The second approach considered the influence of geology by basing the sequential Gaussian simulation of geotechnical parameters on geological unit simulations using a transition probability-based stochastic model. In this approach, a unique spatial variance model of the geotechnical parameter for each geological unit was considered. The results from this analysis revealed that the influence of geology is critical to the spatial modeling of geotechnical parameters and their uncertainty, and, therefore, must be incorporated into the geostatistical analysis for the risk assessment of soft-ground tunneling works.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The borehole data used in this study were provided by SoundTransit (https://www.soundtransit.org). Direct requests for this data may be made to the provider. All code generated for this study is available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Science Foundation and the Partnership for International Research and Education (PIRE) for the financial support of this research, and SoundTransit for providing the site investigation data used in this study.

References

Armstrong, M., A. G. Galli, G. Le Loc’h, F. Geffroy, and R. Eschard. 2003. Plurigaussian simulations in geosciences. New York: Springer.
Bardossy, A., and J. Li. 2008. “Geostatistical interpolation using copulas.” Water Resour. Res. 44: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006115.
Begg, S. H., A. Kay, E. R. Gustason, P. F. Angert, and B. P. Exploration. 1996. “Characterization of a complex fluvial-deltaic reservoir for simulation.” SPE Form. Eval. 11 (03): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.2118/28398-PA.
Bianchi, M., T. Kearsey, and A. Kingdon. 2015. “Integrating deterministic lithostratigraphic models in stochastic realizations of subsurface heterogeneity. Impact on predictions of lithology, hydraulic heads and groundwater fluxes.” J. Hydrol. 531 (Part 3): 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.072.
Carle, S. F. 1999. T-PROGS: Transition probability geostatistical software, 84. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg. 1996. “Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics.” Math. Geol. 28 (4): 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02083656.
Carle, S. F., and G. E. Fogg. 1997. “Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains.” Math. Geol. 29 (7): 891–918. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022303706942.
Castro, S. A. 2007. A probabilistic approach to jointly integrate 3D/4D seismic, production data and geological information for building reservoir models. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Chen, J., X. Li, H. Zhu, and Y. Rubin. 2017. “Geostatistical method for inferring RMR ahead of tunnel face excavation using dynamically exposed geological information.” Eng. Geol. 228 (Oct): 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.004.
Chilès, J.-P., and P. Delfiner. 2012. Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cressie, N. 1985. “Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares.” J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 17 (5): 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01032109.
dell’Arciprete, D., R. Bersezio, F. Felletti, M. Giudici, A. Comunian, and P. Renard. 2012. “Comparison of three geostatistical methods for hydrofacies simulation: a test on alluvial sediments.” Hydrogeol. J. 20 (2): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0808-0.
Deutsch, C. V. 1997. “Direct assessment of local accuracy and precision.” In Vol. 96 of Geostatistics Wollongong, edited by E. Y. Baafi and N. A. Schofield, 115–125. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Deutsch, C. V., and A. G. Journel. 1998. GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Doostmohammadi, M., A. Jafari, and O. Asghari. 2015. “Geostatistical modeling of uniaxial compressive strength along the axis of the Behesht-Abad tunnel in Central Iran.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 74 (3): 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0663-z.
Emery, X., and D. A. Silva. 2009. “Conditional co-simulation of continuous and categorical variables for geostatistical applications.” Comput. Geosci. 35 (6): 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.07.005.
Exadaktylos, G., and M. Stavropoulou. 2008. “A specific upscaling theory of rock mass parameters exhibiting spatial variability: Analytical relations and computational scheme.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 45 (7): 1102–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.11.008.
Felletti, F., and G. P. Beretta. 2009. “Expectation of boulder frequency when tunneling in glacial till: A statistical approach based on transition probability.” Eng. Geol. 108 (1–2): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.006.
Goovaerts, P. 2001. “Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science.” Geoderma 103 (1–2): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00067-2.
Grasmick, J. G. 2019. Modeling spatial geotechnical parameters uncertainty and quantitative tunneling risks. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.
Grasmick, J. G., and M. A. Mooney. 2017. “A probabilistic approach for predicting settlement due to tunneling in spatially varying glacial till.” In Geo-Risk 2017, 300–309. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Gringarten, E., and C. V. Deutsch. 2001. “Teacher’s aide variogram interpretation and modeling.” Math. Geol. 33 (4): 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011093014141.
Guglielmetti, V., P. Grasso, A. Mahtab, and S. Xu. 2007. Mechanised tunnelling in urban areas: Design methodology and construction control. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Huang, H. W., L. Xiao, D. M. Zhang, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Influence of spatial variability of soil Young’s modulus on tunnel convergence in soft soils.” Eng. Geol. 228 (Mar): 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.011.
Huber, M. 2013. Soil variability and its consequences in geotechnical engineering. Stuttgart, Germany: Institut für Geotechnik der Universität Stuttgart.
Huber, M., M. A. Hicks, P. A. Vermeer, and C. Moormann. 2010. “Probabilistic calculation of differential settlement due to tunnelling.” In Proc., 8th Int. Probabilistic Workshop, Szczecin, Poland, 1–13. Szczecin, Poland: Akademia Morska.
Isaaks, E. H. 1990. The application of Monte Carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Jacobs, A. 2013. “Northgate Link extension light rail project contract N125: TBM tunnels (UW to Maple Leaf Portal) geotechnical baseline report.” Accessed March 23, 2020. https://www.bidnet.com/bneattachments?/399481898.pdf.
Maharaja, A., and A. G. Journel. 2005. “Hierarchical simulation of multiple-facies reservoirs using multiple-point geostatistics.” In Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conf. and Exhibition. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Maleki, M., and X. Emery. 2015. “Joint simulation of grade and rock type in a stratabound copper deposit.” Math. Geosci. 47 (4): 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9556-8.
Matheron, G. 1971. “The theory of regionalized variables and its applications.” Fascicule 5 in Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie. Fontainebleau, France: Ecole des Mines de Paris.
Ozturk, C. A., and E. Simdi. 2014. “Geostatistical investigation of geotechnical and constructional properties in Kadikoy–Kartal subway, Turkey.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 41 (1): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.11.002.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Pinheiro, M., J. Vallejos, T. Miranda, and X. Emery. 2016. “Geostatistical simulation to map the spatial heterogeneity of geomechanical parameters: A case study with rock mass rating.” Eng. Geol. 205 (Apr): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.03.003.
Pyrcz, M. J., and C. V. Deutsch. 2014. Geostatistical reservoir modeling. New York: Oxford University Press.
Remy, N., A. Boucher, and J. Wu. 2011. Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: A User’s Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shannon, C. E. 1948. “A mathematical theory of communication.” Bell Syst. Techn. J. 27 (3): 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
Smith, T. E. 2016. “Notebook on spatial data analysis.” Accessed November 22, 2019. https://www.seas.upenn.edu/∼ese502/#notebook.
Stavropoulou, M., G. Xiroudakis, and G. Exadaktylos. 2010. “Spatial estimation of geotechnical parameters for numerical tunneling simulations and TBM performance models.” Acta Geotech. 5 (2): 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-010-0118-z.
Szatmári, G., and L. Pásztor. 2018. “Comparison of various uncertainty modelling approaches based on geostatistics and machine learning algorithms.” Geoderma 337 (Mar): 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.008.
Webster, R., and M. A. Oliver. 2008. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Jul 30, 2019
Accepted: Jan 13, 2020
Published online: Apr 18, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-062X. Email: [email protected]
Michael A. Mooney, M.ASCE
Grewcock Endowed Chair Professor, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1500 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401.
Whitney J. Trainor-Guitton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-3886
Assistant Professor, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Geophysics and Geophysical Engineering, 1318 Maple St., Bldg 6, Golden, CO 80401. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-3886
Gabriel Walton
Assistant Professor, Colorado School of Mines, Dept. of Geology and Geological Engineering, 1516 Illinois St., Golden, CO 80401.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share