Technical Papers
Jan 6, 2020

Influence of Roughness on the Apparent Cohesion of Rock Joints at Low Normal Stresses

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146, Issue 3

Abstract

The shear strength of joints is governed by surface morphology, including roughness and interlocking conditions. Several criteria have been developed in recent decades to assess shear behavior. However, most civil engineering guidelines suggest using the Mohr-Coulomb criterion to evaluate shear strength. The Mohr-Coulomb criterion relies on a friction angle and a cohesion value determined from laboratory tests, the literature, and the engineer’s experience. Two distinct cohesion concepts can be considered: true cohesion, which is a bond between the walls of the joint, and apparent cohesion. Apparent cohesion is obtained by performing a linear regression for the experimental shear strengths obtained in the laboratory for a given normal load interval. For unbounded joints, true cohesion cannot be considered because the walls are not physically bonded. However, apparent cohesion, describing joint roughness, interlocking, and the conditions of the joint walls, can be used with the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. Civil engineering standards are cautious about the use of apparent cohesion during design, and guidelines often recommend considering a null or low value. In this article, we focus on the effects of surface morphology on apparent cohesion, to better appraise the relevance of taking apparent cohesion into account in the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. Direct shear tests were performed on four different rock joint replicas tested under low normal load conditions (0.1–1.0 MPa). The results showed that apparent cohesion increased with roughness. Results also showed that the interlocking and damage state of the joint wall surfaces play a key role in the apparent cohesion value. When the sample is damaged or poorly interlocked, apparent cohesion is significantly reduced.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Hydro-Québec, and IRSTEA (France) for funding the project. The authors thank Danick Charbonneau and Ghislaine Luc (Université de Sherbrooke) for their technical help during the experimental project. The authors are also grateful to Claude Bacconnet (Université Clermont Auvergne), Claudio Carvajal, Jérôme Duriez (IRSTEA), and Marco Quirion (Hydro-Québec) for their involvement in the project.

References

Amiri Hossaini, K., N. Babanouri, and S. Karimi Nasab. 2014. “The influence of asperity deformability on the mechanical behavior of rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 70 (Sep): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.009.
Amitrano, D., and J. Schmittbuhl. 2002. “Fracture roughness and gouge distribution of a granite shear band.” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 107 (B12): ESE 19-1–ESE 19-16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001761.
Atapour, H., and M. Moosavi. 2014. “The influence of shearing velocity on shear behavior of artificial joints.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (5): 1745–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0481-9.
Bandis, S., A. C. Lumsden, and N. R. Barton. 1981. “Experimental studies of scale effects on the shear behaviour of rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 18 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90262-X.
Barton, N. 1973. “Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints.” Eng. Geol. 7 (4): 287–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(73)90013-6.
Barton, N. 2013. “Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: Problems and some solutions.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 5 (4): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.05.008.
Barton, N., and V. Choubey. 1977. “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mech. 10 (1–2): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801.
CEA (Canadian Electricity Association). 1996. Sliding stability of concrete dams. Montreal: CEA.
CFBR (Comité Français des Barrages et Réservoirs). 2012. Recommendations pour la justification de la stabilité des barrages-poids. [In French.]. Le Bourget-du-Lac: CFBR.
Eberhardt, E., D. Stead, and J. S. Coggan. 2004. “Numerical analysis of initiation and progressive failure in natural rock slopes—The 1991 Randa rockslide.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41 (1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00076-5.
EPRI (Electricity Power Research Institute). 1992. Uplift pressures, shear strengths, and tensile strengths for stability analysis of concrete gravity dams. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.
Fathi, A., Z. Moradian, P. Rivard, and G. Ballivy. 2016a. “Shear mechanism of rock joints under pre-peak cyclic loading condition.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 83 (Mar): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.01.009.
Fathi, A., Z. Moradian, P. Rivard, G. Ballivy, and A. J. Boyd. 2016b. “Geometric effect of asperities on shear mechanism of rock joints.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (3): 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0799-6.
Geertsema, A. J. 2003. “The shear strength of rock joints with special reference to dam foundations.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Pretoria.
Ghazvinian, A. H., A. Taghichian, M. Hashemi, and S. A. Mar’ashi. 2010. “The shear behavior of bedding planes of weakness between two different rock types with high strength difference.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 43 (1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0030-8.
Grasselli, G., and P. Egger. 2003. “Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00101-6.
Grasselli, G., J. Wirth, and P. Egger. 2002. “Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (6): 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00070-9.
Hencher, S. R., and L. R. Richards. 2015. “Assessing the shear strength of rock discontinuities at laboratory and field scales.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 48 (3): 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0633-6.
Hoek, E. 2007. “Shear strength of rock discontinuities.” Accessed July 31, 2017. https://www.rocscience.com/learning/hoek-s-corner/books.
Hydro-Québec. 2003. Évaluation de la stabilité des barrages-poids en béton. [In French.]. Montreal: Hydro-Québec.
Indraratna, B., W. Premadasa, E. T. Brown, A. Gens, and A. Heitor. 2014. “Shear strength of rock joints influenced by compacted infill.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 70 (Sep): 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.019.
Jafari, M. K., K. Amini Hosseini, F. Pellet, M. Boulon, and O. Buzzi. 2003. “Evaluation of shear strength of rock joints subjected to cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 23 (7): 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00063-0.
Jang, H.-S., and B.-A. Jang. 2015. “New method for shear strength determination of unfilled, unweathered rock joint.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 48 (4): 1515–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0660-3.
Johansson, F. 2016. “Influence of scale and matedness on the peak shear strength of fresh, unweathered rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 82 (Feb): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.11.010.
Koupouli, N. J. F., T. Belem, P. Rivard, and H. Effenguet. 2016. “Direct shear tests on cemented paste backfill–rock wall and cemented paste backfill–backfill interfaces.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 8 (4): 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.02.001.
Kulatilake, P. H. S. W., G. Shou, T. H. Huang, and R. M. Morgan. 1995. “New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 (7): 673–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00022-9.
Kumar, R., and A. K. Verma. 2016. “Anisotropic shear behavior of rock joint replicas.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 90 (Dec): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.10.005.
Ladanyi, B., and G. Archambault. 1969. “Simulation of shear behavior of jointed rock mass.” In Proc., 11th US Symp. on Rock Mechanics, 105–125. Alexandria, VA: American Rock Mechanics Association.
Lama, R. 1978. “Influence of clay fillings in shear behaviour of joints.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Int. Association of Engineering Geology, 27–34. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment.
Lee, Y.-H., J. R. Carr, D. J. Barr, and C. J. Haas. 1990. “The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27 (6): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)90998-H.
Liu, Q., Y. Tian, P. Ji, and H. Ma. 2018a. “Experimental investigation of the peak shear strength criterion based on three-dimensional surface description.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51 (4): 1005–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1390-0.
Liu, Q., Y. Tian, D. Liu, and Y. Jiang. 2017. “Updates to JRC-JCS model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description.” Eng. Geol. 228 (Oct): 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.020.
Liu, X. R., M. M. Kou, Y. M. Lu, and Y. Q. Liu. 2018b. “An experimental investigation on the shear mechanism of fatigue damage in rock joints under pre-peak cyclic loading condition.” Int. J. Fatigue 106 (Jan): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.007.
Maerz, N. H., J. A. Franklin, and C. P. Bennett. 1990. “Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27 (5): 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)92708-M.
Maksimović, M. 1996. “The shear strength components of a rough rock joint.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 33 (8): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00005-4.
Moradian, Z. A., G. Ballivy, P. Rivard, C. Gravel, and B. Rousseau. 2010. “Evaluating damage during shear tests of rock joints using acoustic emissions.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47 (4): 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.01.004.
Mouzannar, H., M. Bost, M. Leroux, and D. Virely. 2017. “Experimental study of the shear strength of bonded concrete—Rock interfaces: Surface morphology and scale effect.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50 (10): 2601–2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1259-2.
Muralha, J., G. Grasselli, B. Tatone, M. Blümel, P. Chryssanthakis, and J. Yujing. 2014. “ISRM suggested method for laboratory determination of the shear strength of rock joints: Revised version.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (1): 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0519-z.
Nouailletas, O., C. Perlot, P. Rivard, G. Ballivy, and C. La Borderie. 2017. “Impact of acid attack on the shear behaviour of a carbonate rock joint.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50 (6): 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1182-6.
Özvan, A., I. Dinçer, A. Acar, and B. Özvan. 2014. “The effects of discontinuity surface roughness on the shear strength of weathered granite joints.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 73 (3): 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0560-x.
Park, J. W., Y. K. Lee, J. J. Song, and B. H. Choi. 2013. “A constitutive model for shear behavior of rock joints based on three-dimensional quantification of joint roughness.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 46 (6): 1513–1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0365-4.
Patton, F. D. 1966. “Multiple modes of shear failure in rock.” In Proc., 1st ISRM Congress. Lisbon, Portugal: International Society for Rock Mechanics.
Peyras, L., P. Royet, L. Derou, R. Albert, J.-P. Becue, S. Aigouy, E. Bourdarot, D. Loudiere, and J.-B. Kovarik. 2008. “French recommendations for limit-state analytical review of gravity dam stability.” Revue européenne génie civil 12 (9–10): 1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.3166/ejece.12.1137-1164.
Richards, L. R. 1975. The shear strength of joints in weathered rock. London: Univ. of London.
Rousseau, B., P. Rivard, A. Marache, G. Ballivy, and J. Riss. 2012. “Limitations of laser profilometry in measuring surface topography of polycrystalline rocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 52 (Jun): 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.003.
Seidel, J. P., and C. M. Haberfield. 1995. “Towards an understanding of joint roughness.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 28 (2): 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020062.
Seidel, J. P., and C. M. Haberfield. 2002a. “A theoretical model for rock joints subjected to constant normal stiffness direct shear.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (5): 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00056-4.
Seidel, J. P., and C. M. Haberfield. 2002b. “Laboratory testing of concrete-rock joints in constant normal stiffness direct shear.” Geotech. Test. J. 25 (4): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11292J.
Singh, H. K., and A. Basu. 2016. “Shear behaviors of ‘real’ natural un-matching joints of granite with equivalent joint roughness coefficients.” Eng. Geol. 211 (Aug): 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.07.004.
Sow, D., P. Rivard, L. Peyras, P. Breul, Z. A. Moradian, C. Bacconnet, and G. Ballivy. 2016. “Comparison of joint shearing resistance obtained with the Barton and Choubey criterion and with direct shear tests.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (8): 3357–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0898-4.
Tse, R., and D. M. Cruden. 1979. “Estimating joint roughness coefficients.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 16 (5): 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90241-9.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 1995. “Gravity dam design.” In USACE engineer manual. Washington, DC: USACE.
USBR (US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation). 1987. Design of small dams. Washington, DC: Water Resources Technical Publication.
Wu, Q., Y. Xu, H. Tang, K. Fang, Y. Jiang, C. Liu, L. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Kang. 2018. “Investigation on the shear properties of discontinuities at the interface between different rock types in the Badong formation, China.” Eng. Geol. 245 (Nov): 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.002.
Wyllie, D. C., and C. W. Mah. 2004. Rock slope engineering—Civil and mining. New York: Spon Press.
Xia, C.-C., Z.-C. Tang, W.-M. Xiao, and Y.-L. Song. 2014. “New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (2): 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0395-6.
Yang, Z.-Y., A. Taghichian, and W.-C. Li. 2010. “Effect of asperity order on the shear response of three-dimensional joints by focusing on damage area.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47 (6): 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.05.008.
Zandarin, M. T., E. Alonso, and S. Olivella. 2013. “A constitutive law for rock joints considering the effects of suction and roughness on strength parameters.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 60 (Jun): 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.007.
Zhang, X., Q. Jiang, N. Chen, W. Wei, and X. Feng. 2016. “Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (9): 3495–3512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1012-2.
Zhao, J. 1997a. “Joint surface matching and shear strength part A: Joint matching coefficient (JMC).” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (2): 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00062-9.
Zhao, J. 1997b. “Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00063-0.
Zhao, Z., H. Peng, W. Wu, and Y. F. Chen. 2018. “Characteristics of shear-induced asperity degradation of rock fractures and implications for solute retardation.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 105 (May): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 146Issue 3March 2020

History

Received: Feb 19, 2019
Accepted: Sep 5, 2019
Published online: Jan 6, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Département de Génie Civil et de Génie du Bâtiment, Univ. de Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1; Aix Marseille Université, Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, Risques, Écosystèmes, Vulnérabilité, Environnement, Résilience, 3275 Route Cézanne, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-8390. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Département de Génie Civil et de Génie du Bâtiment, Univ. de Sherbrooke, 2500 Blvd. de l’Université, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-0607
Laurent Peyras
Director, Aix Marseille Université, Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, Risques, Écosystèmes, Vulnérabilité, Environnement, Résilience, 3275 Route Cézanne, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France.
Pierre Breul
Professor, Département de génie civil, Univ. Clermont Auvergne, Campus des Cézeaux, 2 Ave. Blaise Pascal, Aubière 63170, France.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share