Technical Papers
Jul 29, 2019

Seismic Deformation Analysis of Embankment Dams Using Simplified Total-Stress Approach

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 10

Abstract

In earthquake-prone areas, risk analyses of seismic potential failure modes for embankment dams are often required. In order to evaluate these potential failure modes, seismically induced deformations are needed. The use of numerical modeling to determine embankment dam deformations has gained wide attention in practice, especially when involving liquefiable soils. This study presents a validation assessment of a finite-difference computer program using embankment dam prototypes tested in dynamic centrifuges. Similar to the total-stress analysis methodology, undrained shear strengths were used to characterize seismic behaviors of the embankment soils. As a simplified approach, uncoupled modeling with a primitive constitutive model was adopted. Quasi-steady-state strengths were determined from the laboratory stress-strain curves for the dilative soils tested in the centrifuges. Calculated results were found to be comparable with the measured data from the centrifuge experiments, which provides some level of confidence in the predictive capability of the finite-difference computer program. In particular, a good correlation was observed between the vmax/amax ratio of the seismic input motions and the calculated settlements.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support and guidance for the work described herein from Robert Pike, the Deputy Chief of Dam Safety Office, and Dennis Hanneman, coordinator of the Dam Performance during Seismic Loading Research Program, of the US Bureau of Reclamation are gratefully acknowledged. The digital data of VELACS Soil Data Report provided by Professor Kanthasamy Muraleetharan of the University of Oklahoma is also greatly appreciated.

Disclaimer

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect policy of the US Department of the Interior. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufactures. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document.

References

Adalier, K., and A.-W. Elgamal. 1993. “Experimental results of centrifuge model No. 7.” In Vol. 1 of Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, edited by K. Arulanandan, and R. F. Scott, 799–807. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Alarcon-Guzman, A., G. A. Leonards, and J. L. Chameau. 1988. “Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 114 (10): 1089–1109.
Ambraseys, N. N., and J. M. Menu. 1988. “Earthquake-induced ground displacements.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 16 (7): 985–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160704.
Arulanandan, K., M. Manzari, X. Zeng, M. Fagan, and R. F. Scott. 1995. “Significance of the VELACS project to the solution of boundary value problems in geotechnical engineering.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 825–832. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri Rolla.
Arulanandan, K., and R. F. Scott. 1993. Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems volume 1. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Arulmoli, K., K. K. Muraleetharan, M. M. Hossain, and L. S. Fruth. 1992. VELACS verification of liquefaction analyses by centrifuge studies laboratory testing program soil data report. Irvine, CA: Earth Technology Corporation.
Astaneh, S. M., H.-Y. Ko, and S. Sture. 1993. “Experimental results of model No. 7.” In Vol. 1 of Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, edited by K. Arulanandan, and R. F. Scott, 783–798. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Azizi, F. 2000. Applied analyses in geotechnics. London: E & FN Spon.
Baziar, M. H., and R. Dobry. 1995. “Residual strength and large-deformation potential of loose silty sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (12): 896–906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(896).
Beaty, M. H., and P. M. Byrne. 2008. “Liquefaction and deformation analyses using a total stress approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (8): 1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1059).
Been, K., M. G. Jefferies, and J. Hachey. 1991. “The critical state of sands.” Géotechnique 41 (3): 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.365.
Bolton, M. D., and C. K. Lau. 1988. “Scale effects arising from particle size.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Geotechnical Centrifuge Modeling, edited by J.-F. Corte, 127–131. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Boulanger, R. W., and M. H. Beaty. 2016. “Seismic deformation analyses of embankment dams: A reviewer’s checklist.” In Proc., 36th Annual USSD Conf., 535–546. Denver: United States Society on Dams.
Boulanger, R. W., R. Kamai, and K. Ziotopoulou. 2014. “Liquefaction induced strength loss and deformation: Simulation and design.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (3): 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9549-x.
Boulanger, R. W., J. Montgomery, and K. Ziotopoulou. 2015. “Nonlinear deformation analyses of liquefaction effects on embankment dams.” In Perspectives on earthquake geotechnical engineering, edited by A. Ansal, and M. Sakr, 247–283. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2015. PM4SAND (version 3): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Davis, CA: Univ. of California at Davis.
Bray, J. D., and T. Travasarou. 2007. “Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (4): 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(381).
Byrne, P. M., S.-S. Park, M. Beaty, M. Sharp, L. Gonzalez, and T. Abdoun. 2004. “Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (2): 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-088.
Converse, A. M., and A. G. Brady. 1992. BAP: Basic strong motion acceleration processing software. Denver: US Geological Survey.
Cubrinovski, M., and K. Ishihara. 1998. “State concept and modified elastoplasticity for sand modelling.” Soils Found. 38 (4): 213–225. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.4_213.
Dawson, E. M., W. H. Roth, S. Nesarajah, G. Bureau, and C. A. Davis. 2001. “A practice oriented pore-pressure-generation model.” In Proc., 2nd Int. FLAC Symp., edited by D. Billaux, X. Rachez, C. Detournay, and R. Hart, 47–54. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Dewoolkar, M. M., H.-Y. Ko, and R. Y. S. Pak. 1999. “Centrifuge modelling of models of seismic effects on saturated earth structures.” Géotechnique 49 (2): 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.2.247.
Hsieh, S.-Y., and C.-T. Lee. 2011. “Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration.” Eng. Geol. 122 (1–2): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.006.
Hubler, J. F., A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and D. Zekkos. 2017. “Monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001723.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1985. “Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, edited by Publications Committee of XI ICSMFE, 321–376. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Ishihara, K. 1993. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique 43 (3): 351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351.
Ishihara, K., F. Tatsuoka, and S. Yasuda. 1975. “Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses.” Soils Found. 15 (1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.15.29.
Jibson, R. W. 2007. “Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement.” Eng. Geol. 91 (2–4): 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.01.013.
Ko, H.-Y. 1988. “Summary of the state-of-the-art in centrifuge model testing.” In Centrifuges in soil mechanics, edited by W. H. Craig, R. G. James, and A. N. Schofield, 11–18. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Ko, H.-Y. 1994. “Modeling seismic problems in centrifuges.” In Proc., Int. Conf. Centrifuge 94, edited by C. F. Leung, F. H. Lee, and T. S. Tan, 3–12. Singapore: National Univ. of Singapore.
Koseki, J., T. Yoshida, and T. Sato. 2005. “Liquefaction properties of Toyoura sand in cyclic tortional shear tests under low confining stress.” Soils Found. 45 (5): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.5_103.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kutter, B. L. 1992. “Dynamic centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1336: 24–30.
Kutter, B. L., M. T. Manzari, M. Zeghal, Y. G. Zhou, and R. J. Armstrong. 2015. “Proposed outline for LEAP verification and validation processes.” In Proc., Geotechnics for Catastrophic Flooding Events, edited by S. Iai, 99–108. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Lee, J., and R. A. Green. 2015. “Empirical predictive relationship for seismic lateral displacement of slopes.” Géotechnique 65 (5): 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP.15.P.011.
Lee, K. Z.-Z., N. Jensen, D. R. Gillette, and D. T. Wittwer. 2017. Validation assessment of FLAC with embankment dam centrifuge models under seismic loads. Denver: Technical Service Center, US Bureau of Reclamation.
Makdisi, F. I., and H. B. Seed. 1978. “Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake induced deformations.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 104 (GT7): 849–867.
Manzari, M. T., et al. 2015. “LEAP projects: Concept and challenges.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilation, edited by S. Iai, 109–116. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
National Research Council. 1985. Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newmark, N. M. 1965. “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.” Géotechnique 15 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139.
Oberkampf, W. L., T. G. Trucano, and C. Hirsch. 2002. “Verification and validation for modeling and simulation in computational science and engineering applications.” In Foundations for verification and validation in the 21st century workshop: Invited paper for Session B1. Laurel, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ.
Oka, F., A. Yashima, T. Shibata, M. Kato, and R. Uzuoka. 1994. “FEM-FDM coupled liquefaction analysis of a porous soil using an elasto-plastic model.” Appl. Sci. Res. 52 (3): 209–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00853951.
Olson, S. M., and T. D. Stark. 2002. “Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow failure case histories.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (3): 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-001.
Poulos, S. J., G. Castro, and J. W. France. 1985. “Liquefaction evaluation procedure.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (6): 772–792. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:6(772).
Rathje, E. M., and G. Antonakos. 2011. “A unified model for predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of rigid and flexible slopes.” Eng. Geol. 122 (1–2): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.12.004.
Rose, A. T. 1995. The undrained behavior of saturated dilatant silts. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Schofield, A. N. 1980. “Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations.” Géotechnique 30 (3): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.227.
Schofield, A. N. 1981. “Dynamic and earthquake geotechnical centrifuge modelling.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 1081–1100. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri Rolla.
Steedman, R. S. 1991. “Centrifuge modeling for dynamic geotechnical studies.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2401–2417. Rolla, MO: Univ. of Missouri Rolla.
Swaisgood, J. R. 2003. “Embankment dam deformations caused by earthquakes.” In Proc., 7th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Taylor, R. N. 1995. “Centrifuges in modelling: Principles and scale effects.” In Proc., Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology, edited by R. N. Taylor, 19–33. London: Chapman & Hall.
Tsukamoto, Y., T. Kamata, F. Tatsuoka, and K. Ishihara. 2007. “Undrained flow characteristics of partially saturated sandy soils in triaxial tests.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2010. Crosshole shear-wave surveys and geophysical borehole logging at Hyrum Dam, Utah. Denver: Technical Service Center.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2015. “Seismic analysis and design.” Chap. 13 in Design standards No. 13. Denver: Technical Service Center.
Vaid, Y. P., E. K. F. Chung, and R. H. Kuerbis. 1990. “Stress path and steady state.” Can. Geotech. J. 27 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-001.
Wang, Z.-L., Y. F. Dafalias, and C.-K. Shen. 1990. “Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand.” J. Eng. Mech. 116 (5): 983–1001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:5(983).
Wilson, D., and B. L. Kutter. 1993. “Experimental results of model No. 7.” In Vol. 1 of Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, edited by K. Arulanandan, and R. F. Scott, 809–816. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Wood, D. M. 2004. Geotechnical modeling. New York: Spon.
Yang, Z., A. Elgamal, and E. Parra. 2003. “Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (12): 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119).
Yoshimine, M., K. Ishihara, and W. Vargas. 1998. “Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand.” Soils Found. 38 (3): 179–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.3_179.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145Issue 10October 2019

History

Received: Dec 28, 2017
Accepted: May 1, 2019
Published online: Jul 29, 2019
Published in print: Oct 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Dec 29, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Civil Engineer, Technical Service Center, US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225-0007 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3151-7606. Email: [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Technical Service Center, US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225-0007. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-4645. Email: [email protected]
David R. Gillette, M.ASCE [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Technical Service Center, US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225-0007. Email: [email protected]
Derek T. Wittwer, M.ASCE [email protected]
Civil Engineer, Technical Service Center, US Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225-0007. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share