Effectiveness of Effective Area Method for Assessing Undrained Capacity of Shallow Rectangular Foundations
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper investigates the effectiveness of the effective area method (EAM) for assessing the undrained load-carrying capacity of rectangular foundations under combined vertical (), horizontal (), and moment loading () by comparing with finite-element method (FEM) results. Predicted ultimate limit states under combined loading from the two methods are compared, and the equivalent rectangle derived from the EAM is compared with the contact region obtained from the FEM. For one-way eccentricity, good agreement in the capacity is achieved with the two methods despite differences between the effective area and actual contact area. However, capacity for two-way eccentricity obtained from the EAM is significantly smaller than that derived from the FEM, with the discrepancy becoming more pronounced with increasing mobilization of the vertical capacity. failure envelopes established by the EAM also fall significantly inside those determined using FEM. The contributing factors for the discrepancies are explored systematically in the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work forms part of the activities of the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS), established in 1997 under the Australian Research Council’s Special Research Centres Program and supported as a node of the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, and through the Fugro Chair in Geotechnics, the Lloyd’s Register Foundation Chair and Centre of Excellence in Offshore Foundations and the Shell EMI Chair in Offshore Engineering.
References
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2011. Recommended practice 2GEO geotechnical and foundation design considerations, 1st ed. Washington, DC: API.
Davis, E. H., and J. R. Booker. 1973. “The effect of increasing strength with depth on the bearing capacity of clays.” Géotechnique 23 (4): 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1973.23.4.551.
Gourvenec, S., M. F. Randolph, and O. Kingsnorth. 2006. “Undrained bearing capacity of square and rectangular footings.” Int. J. Geomech. 6 (3): 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2006)6:3(147).
Gourvenec, S. M., X. Feng, M. F. Randolph, and D. J. White. 2017. “A toolbox for optimizing geotechnical design of subsea foundations.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Hansen, J. B. 1961. “A general formula for bearing capacity.” Dan. Geotech. Inst. Bull. 11: 38–46.
Hansen, J. B. 1970. “A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity.” Dan. Geotech. Inst. Bull. 28: 5–11.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2016. “Petroleum and natural gas industries specific requirements for offshore structures: Part 4.” In Geotechnical and foundation design considerations, 2nd ed. Geneva: ISO.
Meyerhof, G. 1953. “The bearing capacity of foundations under eccentric and inclined loads.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 440–445. Zurich, Switzerland: Organizing Committee.
Riet, B. A., N. B. Yenigul, R. Burgers, and F. Pisanò. 2017. “Evaluation of the intrinsic conservatism in the design codes for subsea mudmats.” In Proc., Offshore Technology Conf. Houston: Offshore Technology Conference.
Salgado, R., A. V. Lyamin, S. W. Sloan, and H. S. Yu. 2004. “Two- and three-dimensional bearing capacity of foundations in clay.” Géotechnique 54 (5): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.5.297.
Shen, Z., X. Feng, and S. Gourvenec. 2016. “Undrained capacity of surface foundations with zero-tension interface under planar VHM loading.” Comput. Geotech. 73: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.11.024.
Taiebat, H., and J. Carter. 2002. “Bearing capacity of strip and circular foundations on undrained clay subjected to eccentric loads.” Géotechnique 52 (1): 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.1.61.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 16, 2018
Accepted: Aug 8, 2018
Published online: Dec 6, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 6, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.