Site Response in a Layered Liquefiable Deposit: Evaluation of Different Numerical Tools and Methodologies with Centrifuge Experimental Results
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 10
Abstract
Results of a centrifuge experiment simulating seismic site response in a layered level liquefiable soil profile are used to evaluate and systematically compare the predictive capabilities of two common numerical platforms and two classes of advanced soil constitutive models (multiyield and bounding surface) used by three different teams. The pressure-dependent multiyield (PDMY02) and simple anisotropic SAND (SANISAND) constitutive models, implemented in open source and commercially available software, were independently calibrated by three teams using the same set of monotonic and cyclic triaxial test results. Class C predictions of the elastoplastic soil response in centrifuge following verification and initial calibration showed excessive dilative tendencies in all constitutive models to different degrees. These tendencies led to a notable overestimation of acceleration spikes at higher frequencies and an underestimation of net excess pore pressures in dense sand. The second calibration phase focused primarily on reducing soil’s dilative tendencies to match centrifuge tests, even at the cost of slightly sacrificing aspects of the response at an element level or abandoning the number of cycles to liquefaction. Despite differences in calibration methodologies and priorities among three modelers, the results show that small element tests and centrifuge experiments do not always lead to the same calibrated soil parameters. Further, although current numerical platforms and advanced constitutive models were capable of reproducing many aspects of seismic site response observed in the centrifuge, they still need fundamental improvements to capture volumetric settlements. This is an old problem that needs attention in future numerical and physical model studies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from the US National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 1362696 and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporting organizations. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mr. Mahir Badanagki and Dr. Peter Kirkwood at the Center for Infrastructure, Energy, and Space Testing of University of Colorado Boulder, who conducted the triaxial and centrifuge tests, respectively, the results of which were used extensively in this study.
References
Alawaji, H., S. S. Runesson, and K. Axelsso. 1992. “Implicit integration in soil plasticity under mixed control from drained and undrained response.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 16 (10): 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610161004.
Andrade, J. E., A. M. Ramos, and A. Lizcano. 2013. “Criterion for flow liquefaction instability.” Acta Geotech. 8 (5): 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0223-x.
Arulanandan, K., and R. F. Scott. 1993. “Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Vol. 1: Experimental results and numerical predictions.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Arulanandan K., and R. F. Scott. 1994. “Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Vol. 2: Experimental results and numerical predictions.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM D4253-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011a. Method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM D7181-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. Standard test methods for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM D4767-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soils. ASTM D5311/D5311M-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bardet, J. P., and W. Choucair. 1991. “A linearized integration technique for incremental constitutive equations.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 15 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610150102.
Bardet, J. P., Q. Huang, and S. W. Chi. 1993. “Numerical prediction for model no 1.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, edited by K. Arulanandan and R. F. Scott, 67–86. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Barrero, A. R. 2019. “Multi-scale modeling of the response of granular soils under cyclic shearing.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Beaty, M., and P. M. Byrne. 1998. “An effective stress model for predicting liquefaction behavior of sand.” In Vol. 1 of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, 766–777. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Biot, M. A. 1941. “General theory of three-dimensional consolidation.” J. Appl. Phys. 12 (2): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886.
Boulanger, R. W., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2015. PM4Sand (Version 3): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Davis, CA: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California.
Byrne, P. 1991. “A cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore-pressure model for sand.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 47–55. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. T. Manzari. 2004. “Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (6): 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622).
Dafalias, Y. F., A. G. Papadimitriou, and X. S. Li. 2004. “Sand plasticity model accounting for inherent fabric anisotropy.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (11): 1319–1333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:11(1319).
Dafalias, Y. F., and M. Taiebat. 2016. “Sanisand-z: Zero elastic range sand plasticity model.” Géotechnique 66 (12): 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.271.
Darendeli, M. B. 2001. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Dashti, S., J. D. Bray, J. M. Pestana, M. R. Riemer, and D. Wilson. 2010a. “Centrifuge testing to evaluate and mitigate liquefaction-induced building settlement mechanisms.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron Eng. 136 (7): 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000179.
Detournay, E., and A. D. Cheng. 1993. “Fundamentals of poroelasticity.” In Chap. 5, Vol. 2 of Comprehensive rock engineering, 113–171. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Drnevich, V. P., and F. E. Richart Jr. 1970. “Dynamic prestraining of dry sands.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 96 (SM2): 453–469.
Ekstrom, L. T., and K. Ziotopoulou. 2017. “Seismic response of liquefiable sloping ground: Validation of class B predictions against the LEAP centrifuge tests.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontier 2017, GSP 281. Roseville, MN: Industrial Fabrics Association International.
Elgamal, A., E. Parra, Z. Yang, R. Dobry, and M. Zeghal. 1998. “Liquefaction constitutive model.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on the Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, edited by P. Lade. Baltimore: A.A. Balkema.
Elgamal, A., Z. Yang, and E. Parra. 2002. “Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (4): 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00022-2.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 1993. Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions., Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.
Finn, W. D. L., M. Yogendrakumar, and N. Yoshida. 1986. TARA-3: A program to compute the seismic response of 2-D embankments and soil–structure interaction systems to seismic loadings. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia.
Ghofrani, A., and P. Arduino. 2016. “Prediction of LEAP centrifuge tests results using a pressure-dependent bounding surface constitutive model.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.12.001.
Hardin, B. O. 1965. “Dynamic versus static shear modulus for dry sand.” Mater. Res. Stand. 5 (5): 232–235.
Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich. 1972. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (SM 7): 667–692.
Hashash, Y. M. A., S. Dashti, M. I. Romero, M. Ghayoomi, and M. Musgrove. 2015. “Evaluation of 1-D seismic site response modeling of sand using centrifuge experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 78: 18–31.
Hashash, Y. M. A., and D. Park. 2001. “Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment.” Eng. Geol. 62 (1–3): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8.
Head, K. H. 1998. “Manual of soil laboratory testing.” Vol. 3 of Effective stress tests. 2nd Ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Howell, R., E. M. Rathje, and R. W. Boulanger. 2015. “Evaluation of simulation models of lateral spread sites treated with prefabricated vertical drains.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (1): 04014076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001185.
Kammerer, A., J. Wu, M. Riemer, J. Pestana, and R. Seed. 2004. “Anew multi-directional simple shear testing database.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Ottawa: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Karimi, Z., and S. Dashti. 2016a. “Numerical and centrifuge modeling of seismic soil-foundation-structure interaction on liquefiable ground.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001346.
Karimi, Z., and S. Dashti. 2016b. “Seismic performance of shallow founded structures on liquefiable ground: Validation of numerical simulations using centrifuge experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (6): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001479.
Kirkwood, P., and S. Dashti. 2018. “A centrifuge study of seismic structure-soil-structure interaction on liquefiable ground and implications for design in dense urban areas.” Earthquake Spectra, in press. https://doi.org/10.1193/052417EQS095M.
Ko, H. Y. 1988. “The Colorado centrifuge facility.” In Proc., Centrifuge 88, edited by J. F. Corte, 73–75. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Kramer, S., and P. Arduino. 1999. “Constitutive modeling of cyclic mobility and implications for site response.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, edited by P. S. Sêco e Pinto, 1029–1034. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Kutter, B. L., T. J. Carey, T. Hashimoto, M. T. Manzari, A. Vasko, M. Zeghal, and R. J. Armstrong. 2015. “LEAP database for verification, validation, and calibration of codes for simulation of liquefaction.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Christchurch, New Zealand: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Kwok, A. O. L., J. P. Stewart, Y. M. A. Hashash, N. Matasovic, R. Pyke, Z. Wang, and Z. Yang. 2007. “Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear seismic ground response analysis procedures.” J. Geotech. Eng. 133 (11): 1385–1398.
Lambe, T. W. 1973. “Predictions in geotechnical engineering.” Géotechnique 23 (2): 151–202. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1973.23.2.151.
Li, X. S., and Y. F. Dafalias. 2012. “Anisotropic critical state theory: Role of fabric.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (3): 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000324.
Li, X. S., and Y. Wang. 1998. “Linear representation of steady-state line for sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124 (12): 1215–1217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1215).
Manzari, M. T., and K. Arulanandan. 1993. “Numerical predictions for model no. 1.” In Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, edited by K. Arulanandan and R. F. Scott, 179–185. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Manzari, M. T., and Y. F. Dafalias. 1997. “A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands.” Géotechnique 47 (2): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.2.255.
Matasovic, N., and M. Vucetic. 1993. “Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (11): 1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:11(1805).
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. Scott, and G. Fenves. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language. Berkeley, CA: Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulations.
McGann, C. R., P. Arduino, and P. Mackenzie-Helnwein. 2015. “A stabilized single-point finite element formulation for three-dimensional dynamic analysis of saturated soils.” Comput. Geotech. 66: 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.002.
Menq, F. Y. 2003. “Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Newmark, N. M. 1959. “A method of computation for structural dynamics.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 85 (3): 67–94.
Olarte, J., B. Paramasivam, S. Dashti, L. Liel, and J. Zannin. 2017. “Centrifuge modeling of mitigation-soil-foundation-structure interaction on liquefiable ground.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 97: 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.014.
Parra, E. 1996. “Numerical modeling of liquefaction and lateral ground deformation including cyclic mobility and dilation response in soil system.” Ph.D. thesis. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Prevost, J. H. 1985. “A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 4 (1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-0.
Ramirez, J. et.al. 2017. “Seismic performance of a layered liquefiable site: Validation of numerical simulations using centrifuge modeling.” In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, Geotechnical Special Publication 281, Reston, VA: ASCE.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses., Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Shahir, H., A. Pak, M. Taibeat, and B. Jeremic. 2012. “Evaluation of variation of permeability in liquefiable soil under earthquake loading.” Comput. Geotech. 40: 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.10.003.
Skempton, A. W. 1954. “The pore-pressure coefficients A and B.” Géotechnique 4 (4): 143–147.
Stewart, D. P., Y. R. Chen, and B. L. Kutter. 1998. “Experience with the use of methylcellulose as a viscous pore fluid in centrifuge models.” Geotech. Test. J. 21 (4): 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11376J.
Taiebat, M., and Y. F. Dafalias. 2008. “SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (8): 915–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.651.
Taiebat, M., Y. F. Dafalias, A. M. Kaynia, and Z. Cheng. 2010. “Propagation of seismic waves through liquefied soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (4): 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.003.
Taiebat, M., H. Shahir, and A. Pak. 2007. “Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.03.004.
Tasiopoulou, P., N. Gerolymos, and G. Gazetas. 2015a “Class A prediction for seismic centrifuge modeling of multi-block quaywall: Undrained (PLAXIS) versus coupled (FLAC) effective stress analysis.” In Proc., 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Barcelona, Spain: European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences.
Tasiopoulou, P., M. Taiebat, N. Tafazzoli, and B. Jeremic. 2015b. “Solution verification procedures for modeling and simulation of fully coupled porous media: Static and dynamic behavior.” Coupled Syst. Mech. 4 (1): 67–98. https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2015.4.1.067.
Yang, Z., and A. Elgamal. 2000. Numerical modeling of earthquake site response including dilation and liquefaction. San Diego: Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California.
Yang, Z., A. Elgamal, and E. Parra. 2003. “Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (11): 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:12(1119).
Yang, Z., J. Lu, and A. Elgamal. 2008. OpenSees soil models and solid-fluid fully coupled elements: User’s manual. San Diego: Dept. of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California.
Zeghal, M., and A. Elgamal. 1998. “Analyses of site liquefaction using downhole array seismic records.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and T. Shiomi. 1984. “Dynamic behavior of saturated porous media, the generalized Biot formulation and its numerical solution.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Geomech. 8 (1): 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610080106.
Ziotopoulou, K. 2016. “Seismic response of liquefiable sloping ground: Class A and C numerical predictions of centrifuge model responses.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.038.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144 • Issue 10 • October 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 17, 2017
Accepted: Apr 17, 2018
Published online: Aug 1, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 1, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.