Technical Papers
Feb 20, 2018

Effect of Cone Penetration Conditioning on Random Field Model Parameters and Impact of Spatial Variability on Liquefaction-Induced Differential Settlements

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 5

Abstract

The prediction of liquefaction-induced damage to structures can be aided in part by an understanding of the magnitude of inherent spatial variability of the underlying liquefaction-susceptible soils. However, little is known about the role of clean sand and overburden stress correction of the cone penetration resistance on the magnitudes of the random field model (RFM) parameters commonly used to describe spatial variability. Using the results of an extensive investigation of a level ground-level stratum test site with liquefaction-susceptible sand and silty sand, clean sand and overburden stress correction was shown to produce little impact to the autocorrelation length of the sands and silty sands investigated in this study. However, the inherent variability and depth-dependent trends in the corrected cone tip resistance are significantly impacted by conditioning commonly required for liquefaction analyses. The RFM parameters developed in this study were used to generate a calibrated, kriged volume of the test site and used to illustrate the roles of the intensity of shaking, the governing scale of a structure, and the spatial variability in the magnitude of liquefaction-induced differential settlement and angular distortion. Owing to the preferential liquefaction of looser materials before denser materials, it is shown that the lower intensities of shaking can produce larger differential settlements and poorer structural performance than higher levels of shaking in level-ground level-stratum sites. This work points to the continued need to study the role of spatial variability on the performance of structures in liquefaction-susceptible soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the data used in this paper was provided to the senior author by the IDEA Program of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Academy of Science, under Grant NCHRP-180, and the South Carolina chapter of the Pile Driving Contractors Association (PDCA). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Ahmed, A., and Soubra, A.-H. (2014). “Probabilistic analysis at the serviceability limit state of two neighboring strip footings resting on a spatially random soil.” Struct. Saf., 49(7), 2–9.
Baker, J. W., and Faber, M. H. (2008). “Liquefaction risk assessment using geostatistics to account for soil spatial variability.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 14–23.
Bandini, P., and Sathiskumar, S. (2009). “Effects of silt content and void ratio on the saturated hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of sand-silt mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1976–1980.
Bong, T., and Stuedlein, A. W. (2017). “Spatial variability of CPT parameters and silty fines in liquefiable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04017093.
Boscardin, M. D., and Cording, E. J. (1989). “Building response to excavation-induced settlement.” J. Geotech. Eng., 1–21.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 138.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2015). “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015065.
Boulanger, R. W., Mejia, L. H., and Idriss, I. M. (1997). “Liquefaction at moss landing during Loma Prieta earthquake.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 453–467.
Boulanger, R. W., and Montgomery, J. (2016). “Nonlinear deformation analyses of an embankment dam on a stochastic liquefiable deposit.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 91(12), 222–233.
Bray, J., Cubrinovski, M., Zupan, J., and Taylor, T. (2014). “Liquefaction effects on buildings in the central business district of Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 85–109.
Bray, J., Markham, C. S., and Cubrinovski, M. (2017). “Liquefaction assessments at shallow foundation building sites in the central business district of Christchurch, NZ.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 92, 153–164.
Bray, J. D., and Dashti, S. (2010). “Liquefaction-induced movements of buildings with shallow foundations.” 5th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 19.
Bray, J. D., and Dashti, S. (2014). “Liquefaction induced building movement.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 2(3), 1129–1156.
Cafaro, F., and Cherubini, C. (2002). “Large sample spacing in evaluation of vertical strength variability of clayey soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 558–568.
Cubrinovski, M., et al. (2011). “Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 44(4), 205–226.
DeGroot, D. J., and Baecher, G. B. (1993). “Estimating autocovariance of in-situ soil properties.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 147–166.
Elkateb, T., Chalaturnyk, R., and Robertson, P. K. (2003). “An overview of heterogeneity: Quantification and implications on geotechnical field problems.” Can. Geotech. J., 40(1), 1–15.
Fenton, G. A. (1999a). “Estimation for stochastic soil models.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 470–485.
Fenton, G. A. (1999b). “Random field modeling of CPT data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 486–498.
Fenton, G. A., and Griffiths, D. V. (2008). Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Fenton, G. A., and Vanmarcke, E. H. (1998). “Spatial variation in liquefaction risk.” Geotechnique, 48(6), 819–831.
Gianella, T. N. (2015). “Ground improvement and liquefaction mitigation using driven timber piles.” M.S. thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
Gianella, T. N., and Stuedlein, A. W. (2017). “Performance of driven displacement pile-improved ground in controlled blasting field tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04017047.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2008). Soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M. (1992). “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found., 32(1), 173–188.
Jaksa, M. B. (1995). “The influence of spatial variability on the geotechnical design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Jaksa, M. B., Brooker, P. I., and Kaggwa, W. S. (1997). “Inaccuracies associated with estimation of random measurement errors.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 393–401.
Jaksa, M. B., Kaggwa, W. S., and Brooker, P. I. (1999). “Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of a stiff clay.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Application of Statistics and Probability, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 415–422.
Kramer, S. L., Sideras, S. S., and Greenfield, M. W. (2016). “The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 91, 133–146.
Krige, D. G. (1951). “A statistical approach to some mine valuations and allied problems at the Witwatersrand.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Witwatersrand, Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Trautmann, C. H. (1996). “Estimation of in situ test uncertainty.” Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice, C. D. Shackelford, P. P. Nelson, and M. J. S. Roth, eds., ASCE, New York, 269–286.
Lacasse, S., and Nadim, F. (1996). “Uncertainties in characterising soil properties.” Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice, ASCE, Reston, VA, 49–75.
Lumb, P. (1974). “Applications of statistics in soil mechanics.” Chapter 3, Soil mechanics: New horizons, I. K. Lee, ed., American Elsevier, New York, 44–111.
Lumb, P. (1975). “Spatial variability of soil properties.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Application of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd- und Grundbau, Essen, Germany, 397–421.
Matheron, G. (1963). “Principals of Geostatistics.” Econ. Geol., 58(8), 1246–1266.
Mayne, P. W. (2007). “NCHRP Synthesis 368: Cone penetration testing.” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Montgomery, J., and Boulanger, R. W. (2016). “Effects of spatial variability on liquefaction-induced settlement and lateral spreading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04016086.
Nagase, H., and Ishihara, K. (1988). “Liquefaction-induced compaction and settlement of sand during earthquakes.” Soils Found., 28(1), 65–76.
Phoon, K. K., and Kulhawy, F. H. (1999). “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J., 36(4), 612–624.
Phoon, K. K., Quek, S. T., and An, P. (2003). “Identification of statistically homogenous soil layers using modified Bartlett statistics.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 649–659.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
Sento, N., Kazama, M., Uzuoka, R., Matsuya, A., and Ishimaru, M. (2004). “Liquefaction-induced volumetric change during re-consolidation of sandy soil subjected to undrained cyclic loading histories.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Cyclic Behaviour of Soils and Liquefaction Phenomena, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 199–206.
Skempton, A. W., and MacDonald, D. H. (1956). “Allowable settlement of buildings.” Proc., Institute of Civil Engineers., Vol. 5, ICE Publishing, London, 727–768.
Son, M., and Cording, E. (2005). “Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 162–177.
Son, M., and Cording, E. (2011). “Responses of buildings with different structural types to excavation-induced ground settlements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 323–333.
Stuedlein, A. W. (2011). “Random field model parameters for Columbia River Silt.” Proc., GeoRisk, ASCE, Reston, VA, 9.
Stuedlein, A. W., and Gianella, T. N. (2016). “Effects of driving sequence and spacing on displacement pile capacity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 06016026.
Stuedlein, A. W., Gianella, T. N., and Canivan, G. (2016). “Densification of granular soils using conventional and drained timber displacement piles.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04016075.
Stuedlein, A. W., Kramer, S. L., Arduino, P., and Holtz, R. D. (2012a). “Geotechnical characterization and random field modeling of desiccated clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1301–1313.
Stuedlein, A. W., Kramer, S. L., Arduino, P., and Holtz, R. D. (2012b). “Reliability of spread footing performance in desiccated clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1314–1325.
Tang, W. H. (1979). “Probabilistic evaluation of penetration resistance.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 105(10), 1173–1191.
Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H. B. (1987). “Evaluation in settlements of sands due to earthquake shaking.” J. Geotech. Eng., 861–878.
Uzielli, M., Lacasse, S., Nadim, F., and Phoon, K. K. (2007). “Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice.” Proc., Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, U.K., 1653–1752.
Uzielli, M., Vannucchi, G., and Phoon, K. K. (2005). “Random field characterisation of stress-normalised cone penetration testing parameters.” Geotechnique, 55(1), 3–20.
van Ballegooy, S., et al. (2014). “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), 31–55.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). “Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 103(11), 1227–1246.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1984). Random fields: Analysis and synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 382.
Yoshimine, M., Nishizaki, H., Amano, K., and Hosono, Y. (2006). “Flow deformation of liquefied sand under constant shear load and its application to analysis of flow slide of infinite slope.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(2), 253–264.
Zhu, H., and Zhang, L. M. (2013). “Characterizing geotechnical anisotropic spatial variations using random field theory.” Can. Geot. J., 50(7), 723–734.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 144Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: Dec 10, 2016
Accepted: Oct 12, 2017
Published online: Feb 20, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 20, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Taeho Bong
Postdoctoral Scholar, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331.
Armin W. Stuedlein, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share