Technical Papers
Aug 10, 2017

Cyclic Loading Response of Silt with Multiple Loading Events

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 10

Abstract

The evolution of cyclic resistance with multiple loading events is evaluated for nonplastic and low-plasticity silts with plasticity indices of 0 and 6, respectively. A series of direct simple shear tests with multiple cyclic loading and reconsolidation stages is performed on young slurry-sedimented specimens. Evolution of cyclic strength with a series of multiple loading events is examined with respect to densification from postcyclic reconsolidation, shear strain–induced fabric, and initial consolidation history. Initially normally consolidated specimens of both silts develop progressive increases in cyclic strength with prior strain history, with cyclic resistance ratios ultimately exceeding 0.6. Specimens consolidated with an initial overconsolidation ratio of 2 experience an 18–32% loss of cyclic strength following the first stage of cyclic shearing and reconsolidation. The two silts develop similar magnitudes of reconsolidation strain, but the low-plasticity silt requires more volumetric strain (and therefore more loading events) to develop large cyclic strengths. Implications for future advances in liquefaction triggering correlations and engineering practice are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Portions of the work presented herein were derived from studies supported by the California Department of Water Resources (contract 4600009751) and the National Science Foundation (grants CMMI-1138203 and CMMI-1300518). Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of either organization. Ana Maria Parra Bastidas performed the one-dimensional compression tests presented herein. The authors are grateful for this assistance and support.

References

ASTM. (2016). “Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of cohesive soils.” ASTM D6528-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bjerrum, L., and Landva, A. (1966). “Direct simple-shear tests on a Norwegian quick clay.” Géotechnique, 16(1), 1–20.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.”, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 134.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2016). “CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015065.
Boulanger, R. W., and Seed, R. B. (1995). “Liquefaction of sand under bidirectional monotonic and cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng., 870–878.
Bray, J. D., and Sancio, R. B. (2006). “Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1165–1177.
Castro, G. (1975). “Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sands.” J. Geotechnical Eng. Div., 101(GT6), 551–569.
Darby, K. M., Bronner, J. D., Parra Bastidas, A. M., Boulanger, R. W., and DeJong, J. T. (2016). “Effect of shaking history on cone penetration resistance and cyclic strength of saturated sand.” Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
El-Sekelly, W., Dobry, R., Abdoun, T., and Steidl, J. H. (2016). “Centrifuge modeling of the effect of preshaking on the liquefaction resistance of silty sand deposits.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04016012.
Finn, W. D., Bransby, P. L., and Pickering, D. J. (1970). “Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 96(SM6), 1917–1934.
Franke, E., Kiekbusch, M., and Schuppener, B. (1979). “A new direct simple shear device.” Geotech. Test. J., 2(4), 190–199.
Guo, T., and Prakash, S. (1999). “Liquefaction of silts and silt-clay mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 706–710.
Ha, I. S., Olson, S. M., Seo, M. W., and Kim, M. M. (2011). “Evaluation of reliquefaction resistance using shaking table tests.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 31(4), 682–691.
Hayati, H., and Andrus, R. D. (2009). “Updated liquefaction resistance correction factors for aged sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1683–1692.
Ishihara, K. (1993). “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Géotechnique, 43(3), 351–451.
Ishihara, K., and Okada, S. (1978). “Effects of stress history on cyclic behavior of sand.” Soils Found., 18(4), 31–45.
Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M. (1992). “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found., 32(1), 173–188.
Kokusho, T., Ito, F., Nagao, Y., and Green, A. R. (2012). “Influence of non/low-plastic fines and associated aging effects on liquefaction resistance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 747–756.
Maurer, B. W., Green, R. A., Bradley, B. A., and Cubrinovski, M. (2014). “Assessment of aging correction factors for liquefaction resistance at sites of recurrent liquefaction.” 10th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (NCEE10), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Mitchell, J. K., and Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York.
Oda, M., Kawamoto, K., Suzuki, K., Fujimori, H., and Sato, M. (2001). “Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 416–423.
Olson, S. M., Obermeier, S. F., and Stark, T. D. (2001). “Interpretation of penetration resistance for back-analysis at sites of previous liquefaction.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 72(1), 46–59.
Romero, S. (1995). “The behavior of silt as clay content is increased.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Sanin, M. V., and Wijewickreme, D. (2006). “Cyclic shear response of channel-fill Fraser River Delta silt.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(9), 854–869.
Seed, H. B., Chan, C. K., and Mori, K. (1977). “Influence of seismic history on liquefaction of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 103(4), 257–270.
Suzuki, T., and Toki, S. (1984). “Effects of preshearing on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand subjected to cyclic loading.” Soils Found., 24(2), 16–28.
Wakamatsu, K. (2012). “Recurrent liquefaction induced by the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake compared with the 1987 earthquake.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 675–686.
Wijewickreme, D., and Soysa, A. (2016). “Stress-strain pattern-based criterion to assess cyclic shear resistance of soil from laboratory element tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 53(9), 1460–1473.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 143Issue 10October 2017

History

Received: Sep 16, 2016
Accepted: Apr 11, 2017
Published online: Aug 10, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Jan 10, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-0458. E-mail: [email protected]
J. T. DeJong, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.
R. W. Boulanger, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share