Statistical Evaluation of the FHWA Simplified Method and Modifications for Predicting Soil Nail Loads
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 3
Abstract
A total of 123 measured maximum nail-load data were collected from instrumented soil nail walls reported in the literature. Filtered data sets corresponding to short-term and long-term measurements were used to evaluate the accuracy of the current Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) simplified method to calculate maximum nail loads under operational conditions. The accuracy of load predictions was quantified by the mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of the ratio (bias) of measured load to predicted load. Data in short-term and long-term categories were also investigated according to frictional-cohesive and frictional soil types. Based on the available data, the current FHWA simplified method was found to overestimate both long-term and short-term maximum nail loads on average. The spreads in prediction accuracy measured by the COV of bias were 38 and 52% for long-term and short-term data, respectively. Large spreads in prediction accuracy were also found using data for walls with cohesive-frictional soils alone. With the exception of the frictional soil data set, there was an undesirable correlation (dependency) between method accuracy and predicted maximum nail load using the current FHWA simplified method. A modified FHWA simplified method equation is proposed that has fewer empirical coefficients than the current formulation (i.e., three compared to five) and is shown to be more accurate on average and to have less spread in prediction accuracy for all data sets. Furthermore, hidden dependencies between method accuracy and magnitude of predicted load are not present.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Mr. T. D. Wentworth from Amec Foster Wheeler (Environment and Infrastructure, Washington, DC) for his assistance to clarify details of some source data used in the present study. Financial support for this study was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Engage Program, Ontario Ministry of Transportation Highway Infrastructure Innovations Funding Program (MTO HIIFP), and DYWIDAG-Systems International Canada, Ltd.
References
AASHTO. (2014). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 7th Ed., Washington, DC.
Allen, T. M., and Bathurst, R. J. (2015). “An improved simplified method for prediction of loads in reinforced soil walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015049.
Allen, T. M., Nowak, A. S., and Bathurst, R. J. (2005). “Calibration to determine load and resistance factors for geotechnical and structural design.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Banerjee, S., Finney, A., Wentworth, T. D., and Bahiradhan, M. (1998a). “Evaluation of design methodologies for soil-nailed walls, Volume 1.”, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, DC.
Banerjee, S., Finney, A., Wentworth, T. D., and Bahiradhan, M. (1998b). “Evaluation of design methodologies for soil-nailed walls, Volume 2: Distribution of axial forces in soil nails based on interpolation of measured strains.”, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, DC.
Bathurst, R. J., Huang, B., and Allen, T. M. (2011). “Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for steel grid reinforced soil walls.” Georisk, 5(3–4), 218–228.
Bathurst, R. J., Huang, B., and Allen, T. M. (2012). “LRFD calibration of the ultimate pullout limit state for geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls.” Int. J. Geomech., 399–413.
Bathurst, R. J. (2014). “LRFD calibration of simple limit state functions in geotechnical soil-structure design.” Chapter 8, Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: Computations and applications, K. K. Phoon and J. Ching, eds., Spon Press, Oxon, U.K., 339–354.
Bathurst, R. J., Allen, T. M., and Nowak, A. S. (2008). “Calibration concepts for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of reinforced soil walls.” Can. Geotech. J., 45(10), 1377–1392.
Briaud, J. L., and Lim, Y. (1997). “Soil-nailed wall under piled bridge abutment: Simulation and guidelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1043–1050.
Byrne, R. J., Cotton, D., Porterfield, J., Wolschlag, C., and Ueblacker, G. (1998). “Manual for design and construction monitoring of soil nail wall.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Cartier, G., and Gigan, J. P. (1983). “Experiments and observations in soil nailing structures.” Proc., 8th European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Founding Engineering, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 473–476.
CLOUTERRE. (1991). “Recommendations Clouterre 1991: Soil nailing recommendations for designing, calculating, constructing and inspecting earth support systems using soil nailing.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Harr, M. E. (1987). Reliability-based design in civil engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Holman, T., and Tuozzolo, T. (2009). “Load development in soil nails from a strain-gauge instrumented wall.” Contemporary Topics in Ground Modification, Problem Soils, and Geo-Support, M. Iskander, D. F. Laefer, and M. H. Hussein, ASCE, Reston, VA, 25–32.
Huang, B., and Bathurst, R. J. (2009). “Evaluation of soil-geogrid pullout models using a statistical approach.” ASTM Geotech. Test. J., 32(6), 489–504.
Huang, B., Bathurst, R. J., and Allen, T. M. (2012). “LRFD calibration for steel strip reinforced soil walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 922–933.
Juran, I., Baudrand, G., Farrag, K., and Elias, V. (1990). “Kinematical limit analysis for design of soil-nailed structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 116(1), 54–72.
Juran, I., and Elias, V. (1987). “Soil nailed retaining structures: Analysis of case histories.” ASCE, New York, 232–244.
Landau Associates. (1999). “Monitoring of soil nailed walls at the highway 217 and highway 26 interchange-final report.”, Oregon Dept. of Transportation Research Group, Oregon, and Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Lazarte, C. A. (2011). “Proposed specifications for LRFD soil-nailing design and construction.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Lazarte, C. A., Elias, V., Espinoza, D., and Sabatini, P. J. (2003). “Geotechnical engineering circular No. 7 soil nail walls.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Lazarte, C. A., Robinson, H., Gómez, J. E., Baxter, A., Cadden, A., and Berg, R. (2015). “Geotechnical engineering circular No. 7 soil nail walls—Reference manual.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
MATLAB 2014b [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Miyata, Y., and Bathurst, R. J. (2012). “Measured and predicted loads in steel strip reinforced c-ϕ soil walls in Japan.” Soils Found., 52(1), 1–17.
Pedley, M. J., and Pugh, R. S. (1995). “Soil nailing in the Hastings Beds.” Engineering geology of construction, Geological Society of London, Manchester, U.K., 361–368.
Shen, C. K., Bang, S., Romstad, J. M., Kulchin, L., and Denatale, J. S. (1981). “Field measurement of an earth support system.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 107(GT12), 1625–1642.
Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R. B. (1967). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, Wiley, New York.
Thompson, S. R., and Miller, I. R. (1990). “Design, construction, and performance of a soil nailed wall in Seattle, Washington.” Design and performance of earth retaining structures, ASCE, New York, 629–643.
Wei, Y. Q. (2013). “Development of equivalent surcharge loads for the design of soil nailed segment of MSE/Soil nail hybrid retaining walls based on results from full-scale wall instrumentation and finite element analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX.
Wentworth, T. D. (1994). “Distribution of axial forces in soil nails based on interpolation of measured strains.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Yu, Y., and Bathurst, R. J. (2015). “Analysis of soil-steel bar mat pullout models using a statistical approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 14, 2016
Accepted: Jul 18, 2016
Published online: Sep 30, 2016
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.