Analysis of Piezocone Penetration under Different Drainage Conditions with the Two-Phase Material Point Method
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142, Issue 12
Abstract
The piezocone penetration test (CPTU) is commonly used to identify a soil’s profile and estimate its material properties. Depending on the soil type, ranging from clay to sand, undrained, partially drained, or drained conditions may occur during cone penetration. In silt and sand–clay mixtures, the CPTU penetration is characterized by partially drained conditions, which are often neglected in data interpretation. The effect of drainage on CPTU measurements has been mainly studied experimentally. Numerical analyses are rare because taking into account large soil deformations, soil–water and soil–structure interactions, and nonlinear soil behavior is still a challenging task. This paper presents and discusses numerical simulations of CPTU in saturated soils with the two-phase material point method. Soil behavior is described with the modified cam clay model. This study investigates the effects of pore pressure dissipation during penetration, cone roughness, and horizontal stress state, comparing the results with experimental data. The paper discusses the effect of neglecting partial drainage in deriving the shear strength parameters for silty soils and suggests a procedure to estimate the consolidation coefficient for performing CPTU at different penetration rates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Prof. Pieter Vermeer for his strong support, without which this work would have been much more difficult and Dr-Ing. Issam Al-Kafaji, former Deltares researcher, for his contributions to the research efforts leading to this publication.
References
Abe, K., Kenichi, S., and Bandara, S. (2013). “Material point method for coupled hydromechanical problems.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013033.
Abu-Farsakh, M., Tumay, M., and Voyiadjis, G. (2003). “Numerical parametric study of piezocone penetration test in clays.” Int. J. Geomech., 170–181.
Al-Kafaji, I. K. J. (2013). “Formulation of a dynamic material point method (MPM) for geomechanical problems.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Stuttgart, Stuttgrart, Germany.
Alonso, E., and Zabala, F. (2011). “Progressive failure of Aznalcollar dam using the material point method.” Geotechnique, 61(9), 795–808.
Alonso, E. E., Yerro, A., and Pinyol, N. M. (2015). “Recent developments of the material point method for the simulation of landslides.” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 26, IOP Publishing, Bristol, U.K., 012003.
Andersen, S., and Andersen, L. (2010a). “Analysis of spatial interpolation in the material-point method.” Comput. Struct., 88(7), 506–518.
Andersen, S., and Andersen, L. (2010b). “Modelling of landslides with the material-point method.” Comput. Geosci., 14(1), 137–147.
Bandara, S., and Soga, K. (2015). “Coupling of soil deformation and pore fluid flow using material point method.” Comput. Geotech., 63(1), 199–214.
Bardenhagen, S. G., Guilkey, J. E., Roessig, K. M., Brackbill, J. U., Witzel, W. M., and Foster, J. C. (2001). “Improved contact algorithm for the material point method and application to stress propagation in granular material.” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 2(4), 509–522.
Bardenhagen, S. G., and Kober, E. M. (2004). “The generalized interpolation material point method.” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 5(6), 477–496.
Beuth, L. (2012). “Formulation and application of a quasi-static material point method.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Beuth, L., and Vermeer, P. A. (2013). “Large deformation analysis of cone penetration testing in undrained clay.” Installation effects in geotechnical engineering, Taylor & Francis, London.
Beuth, L., Więckowski, Z., and Vermeer, P. A. (2011). “Solution of quasi-static large-strain problems by the material point method.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 35(13), 1451–1465.
Ceccato, F., and Simonini, P. (2016). “Numerical study of partially drained penetration and pore pressure dissipation in piezocone test.” Acta Geotech., 1–15.
Chung, S. F., Randolph, M. F., and Schneider, J. A. (2006). “Effect of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance in clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1188–1196.
Coetzee, C. J., Vermeer, P. A., and Basson, A. H. (2005). “The modelling of anchors using the material point method.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 29(9), 879–895.
Cromer, A. (1981). “Stable solutions using the Euler approximation.” Am. J. Phys., 49(5), 455–459.
Cundall, P. A., and Strack, O. D. (1979). “A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies.” Geotechnique, 29(1), 47–65.
DeJong, J. T., and Randolph, M. (2012). “Influence of partial consolidation during cone penetration on estimated soil behavior type and pore pressure dissipation measurements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 777–788.
Detournay, C., and Dzik, E. (2006). “Nodal mixed discretization for tetrahedral elements.” Proc., 4th Int. FLAC Symp., Numerical Models and Geomechanics.
Finnie, I. M. S., and Randolph, M. F. (1994). “Punch-through and liquefaction induced failure of shallow foundations on calcareous sediments.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Behavior of Offshore Structures, Boston, 217–230.
Harlow, F. H. (1955). “A machine calculation method for hydrodynamic problems.”, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
Houlsby, G. T., and Hitchman, R. (1988). “Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in sand.” Geotechnique, 38(1), 39–44.
House, A. R., Oliveira, J. R. M., and Randolph, M. F. (2001). “Evaluating the coefficient of consolidation using penetration tests.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech., 1(3), 17–26.
Huang, W., Sheng, D., Sloan, S. W., and Yu, H. S. (2004). “Finite element analysis of cone penetration in cohesionless soil.” Comput. Geotech., 31(7), 517–528.
Jaeger, R. A., DeJong, J. T., Boulanger, R. W., Low, H. E., and Randolph, M. F. (2010). “Variable penetration rate CPT in an intermediate soil.” Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing, Omnipress, Madison, WI.
Jassim, I., Stolle, D., and Vermeer, P. (2013). “Two-phase dynamic analysis by material point method.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 37(15), 2502–2522.
Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R., and Lee, W. (2008). “Effect of penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in saturated clayey soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1142–1153.
Kouretzis, G. P., Sheng, D., and Wang, D. (2014). “Numerical simulation of cone penetration testing using a new critical state constitutive model for sand.” Comput. Geotech., 56, 50–60.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Mayne, P. W. (1990). “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design.”, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
Lehane, B., O’Loughlin, C., Randolph, M., and Gaudin, C. (2009). “Rate effects on penetrometer resistance in kaolin.” Geotechnique, 59(1), 41–52.
Lemos, L., and Vaughan, P. (2000). “Clay-interface shear resistance.” Geotechnique, 50(1), 55–64.
Lu, Q., Hu, Y., Randolph, M. F., and Bugarski, I. C. (2004). “A numerical study of cone penetration in clay.” Geotechnique, 54(4), 257–267.
Lucy, L. B. (1977). “A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis.” Astron. J., 82(12), 1013–1024.
Lunne, T., Robertson, P., and Powell, J. (1997). Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice, EF Spon/Routledge, New York.
Mahmoodzadeh, H., and Randolph, M. (2014). “Penetrometer testing: Effect of partial consolidation on subsequent dissipation response.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04014022.
Mahmoodzadeh, H., Randolph, M. F., and Wang, D. (2014). “Numerical simulation of piezocone dissipation test in clays.” Géotechnique, 64(8), 657–666.
Mieremet, M. M. J., Stolle, D. F., Ceccato, F., and Vuik, C. (2015). “Numerical stability for modelling of dynamic two-phase interaction.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., in press.
Nøst, H. A. (2011). “Undrained soft soil modelling with the material point method.” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Oliveira, J., Almeida, M., Motta, H., and Almeida, M. (2011). “Influence of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 695–703.
Phuong, N. T. V., van Tol, A. F., Elkadi, A. S. K., and Rohe, A. (2014). “Modelling of pile installation using the material point method (MPM).” Numer. Methods Geotech. Eng., 271.
Phuong, N. T. V., van Tol, A. F., Elkadi, A. S. K., and Rohe, A. (2016). “Numerical investigation of pile installation effects in sand using material point method.” Comput. Geotech., 73, 58–71.
Potyondy, J. (1961). “Skin friction between various soils and construction materials.” Geotechnique, 11(4), 339–353.
Qiu, G. (2014). “Numerical analysis of penetration tests in soils.” Ports for container ships of future generations, J. Grabe, ed., Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg, Institut für Geotechnik und Baubetrieb, Hamburg, Germany, 183–196.
Randolph, M. F. (2004). “Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Site Characterisation, Vol. 1, Porto, Portugal, 209–231.
Randolph, M. F., and Hope, S. (2004). “Effect of cone velocity on cone resistance and excess pore pressures.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Practice and Performance of Soft Deposits, Yodagawa Kogisha, Osaka, Japan, 147–152.
Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1983). “Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: Sand.” Can. Geotech. J., 20(4), 718–733.
Roscoe, K. H., and Burland, J. B. (1968). “On the generalised stress–strain behaviour of wet clay.” Engineering plasticity, J. Heyman and F. P. Leckie, eds., Cambridge University Press, New York, 535–609.
Sadeghirad, A., Brannon, R. M., and Burghardt, J. (2011). “A convected particle domain interpolation technique to extend applicability of the material point method for problems involving massive deformations.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 86(12), 1435–1456.
Schneider, J., Lehane, B. M., and Schnaid, F. (2007). “Velocity effects on piezocone measurements in normally and over consolidated clays.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech., 7(2), 23–34.
Schneider, J. A., Randolph, M. F., Mayne, P. W., and Ramsey, N. R. (2008). “Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalized piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1569–1586.
Senneset, K., Janubu, N., and Svano, G. (1982). “Strength and deformation parameters from cone penetration tests.” Proc., 2nd European Symp. on Penetration Testing, Vol. 2, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 863–870.
Silva, M. F., White, D. J., and Bolton, M. D. (2006). “An analytical study of the effect of penetration rate on piezocone tests in clay.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 30(6), 501–527.
Soga, K., Alonso, E., Yerro, A., Kumar, K., and Bandara, S. (2016). “Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method.” Géotechnique, 66(3), 248–273.
Steffen, M., Kirby, R. M., and Berzins, M. (2008). “Analysis and reduction of quadrature errors in the material point method (MPM).” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 76(6), 922–948.
Stewart, D. P. (1992). “Lateral loading of piled bridge abutments due to embankment construction.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., and Schreyer, H. (1994). “A particle method for hystory-dependent materials.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 118(1-2), 179–196.
Sulsky, D., Zhou, S. J., and Schreyer, H. L. (1995). “Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 87(1), 236–252.
Susila, E., and Hryciw, R. D. (2003). “Large displacement FEM modelling of the cone penetration test (CPT) in normally consolidated sand.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 27(7), 585–602.
Van Langen, H. (1991). “Numerical analysis of soil-structure interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Delft Univ. of Technology, TU Delft, Netherlands.
Vermeer, P. A. (1993). PLAXIS 2D reference manual version 5, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Wieckowski, Z. (2004). “The material point method in large strain engineering problems.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(39–41), 4417–4438.
Wieckowski, Z., Youn, S. K., and Yeon, J. H. (1999). “A particle -in-cell solution to the silo discharging problem.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 45(9), 1203–1225.
Yerro, A., Alonso, E. E., and Pinyol, N. M. (2014). “Run-out of landslides in brittle soils: An MPM analysis.” Proc., TC105 ISSMGE Int. Symp. on Geomechanics from Micro to Macro, 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 977–982.
Yi, J., Randolph, M., Goh, S., and Lee, F. (2012). “A numerical study of cone penetration in fine-grained soils allowing for consolidation effects.” Geotechnique, 62(8), 707–719.
Yu, H., and Mitchell, J. (1998). “Analysis of cone resistance: Review of methods.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 140–149.
Zhang, D. Z., Zou, Q., Vander Heyden, W. B., and Ma, X. (2008). “Material point method applied to multiphase flows.” J. Comput. Phys., 227(6), 3159–3173.
Zienkiewicz, O., Chang, C., and Bettess, P. (1980). “Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behaviour assumptions in soils.” Geotechnique, 30(4), 385–395.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 142 • Issue 12 • December 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 22, 2015
Accepted: Apr 5, 2016
Published online: Jul 11, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.