Dynamic Centrifuge Tests to Evaluate Reinforcing Mechanisms of Soil-Cement Columns in Liquefiable Sand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141, Issue 6
Abstract
Four centrifuge tests were performed to investigate the reinforcing mechanisms of soil-cement columns in liquefiable sand. Two unimproved baseline models and two models improved with soil-cement columns were subjected to sine sweep and earthquake base motions of varying intensities to observe acceleration, pore pressure, lateral displacement, and settlement responses. The dynamic records were processed to derive the effective natural frequency of the profiles and to obtain the dynamic stress-strain responses for unimproved and improved soil. It was found that the shear reinforcement mechanisms of columns was not effective in reducing cyclic stress ratios in the treated soil; liquefaction triggering occurred nearly at same time for both unimproved and improved soil cases and the magnitude of the resulting soil settlement was not significantly reduced. When the bases of the columns were free to rotate, the columns rocked within the soil and produced negligible shear stiffening of the soil profile. When the bases of the columns were fixed against rocking, the columns deformed primarily in shear and flexure but the observed increase in natural frequency of the improved profile was much smaller than predicted by assuming shear strain compatibility between the columns and soil. Design equations that account for shear strain incompatibility are shown to give reasonable estimates for the observed natural frequency of the improved soil profile, and these equations suggest that the associated reduction in cyclic shear stress in the improved soil is small. The soil-cement columns did, however, remain intact and would have provided a means for supporting overlying structures even after liquefaction was triggering in the soil.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Support for this research was provided by the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, and National Science Foundation (NSF) through the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEEScomm) under Grant No. CMMI-1208117. The staff at the Center for Geotechnical Modeling at UC Davis assisted with development of model preparation methods. All of the support and assistance are greatly appreciated.
References
Adalier, K., and Elgamal, A. (2004). “Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns.” Eng. Geol., 72(3–4), 275–291.
Adalier, K., Elgamal, A., Meneses, J., and Baez, J. I. (2003). “Stone columns as liquefaction counter-measure in non-plastic silty soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake. Eng., 23(7), 571–584.
Arulmoli, K., Muraleetharan, K. K., Hossain, M. M., and Fruth, L. S. (1992). VELACS: Verification of Liquefaction Analyses by Centrifuge Studies, Laboratory Testing Program, Soil Data Rep., Earth Technology Corporation, Irvine, CA.
Baez, J. I. (1995). “A design model for the reduction of soil liquefaction by using vibro-stone columns.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Brandenberg, S. J., Wilson, D. W., and Rashid, M. M. (2009). “Weighted residual numerical differentiation algorithm applied to experimental bending moment data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 854–863.
Dashti, S. (2009). “Toward developing an engineering procedure for evaluating building performance on softened ground.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Durgunoglu, H. T. (2006). “Utilization of high modulus columns in foundation engineering under seismic loadings.” U.S. 8th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, San Francisco.
Fiegel, G. L., Hudson, M., Idriss, I. M., Kutter, B. L., and Zeng, X. (1994). “Effects of model containers on dynamic soil response.” Proc., Int. Conf., Centrifuge 94, C. F. Leung, F.-H. Lee, and T. S. Tan, eds., A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 145–150.
GEER (Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance). (2010). “Geotechnical engineering reconnaissance of the 2010 Haiti earthquake.” 〈http://www.geerassociation.org〉 (Aug. 15, 2013).
GEER (Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance). (2011a). “Geotechnical quick report on the Kanto plain region during the March 11, 2011, off Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake, Japan.” 〈http://www.geerassociation.org〉 (Aug. 15, 2013).
GEER (Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance). (2011b). “Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake.” 〈http://www.geerassociation.org〉 (Aug. 15, 2013).
Goughnour, R. R., and Pestana, J. M. (1998). “Mechanical behavior of stone columns under seismic loading.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. Ground Improvement Techniques, CI-Premier, Singapore, 157–162.
Green, R. A., Olgun, C. G., and Wissmann, K. J. (2008). “Shear stress redistribution as a mechanism to mitigate the risk of liquefaction.” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV GSP 181, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Gueguin, M., Buhan, P., and Hassen, G. (2013). “A homogenization approach for evaluating the longitudinal shear stiffness of reinforced soils: column versus cross trench configuration.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 37(18), 3150–3172.
Kamai, R., and Boulanger, R. W. (2010). “Characterizing localization processes during liquefaction using inverse analyses of instrumentation arrays.” Meso-Scale Shear Physics in Earthquake and Landslide Mechanics, Y. H. Hatzor, J. Sulem, and I. Vardoulakis, eds., CRC Press/Balkema, Netherlands, 219–238.
Martin, J. R., Olgun, C. G., Mitchell, J. K., and Durgunoglu, H. T. (2004). “High-modulus columns for liquefaction mitigation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 561–571.
Mitchell, J. K. (2008). “Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands.” From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 433–451.
Olgun, C. G., and Martin, J. R. (2008). “Numerical modeling of the seismic response of columnar reinforced ground.” Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV GSP 181, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Rayamajhi, D., et al. (2012). “Effect of discrete columns on shear stress distribution in liquefiable soil.” Proc., Geo-Congress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1908–1917.
Rayamajhi, D., et al. (2014a). “Numerical study of shear stress distribution for discrete columns in liquefiable soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04013034.
Rayamajhi, D., et al. (2014b). “Reinforcing effects of soil-cement columns in liquefiable sand.” Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (distributor), Dataset.
Schofield, A. N. (1981). “Dynamic and earthquake geotechnical centrifuge modeling.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Vol. 3, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 1081–1100.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 141 • Issue 6 • June 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 22, 2014
Accepted: Dec 30, 2014
Published online: Feb 4, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Jul 4, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.