Technical Papers
Apr 26, 2012

Effects of Geocell Confinement on Strength and Deformation Behavior of Gravel

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 2

Abstract

In past years, railroad transportation has been of growing interest because of its efficiency and advancement in railway technologies. However, many issues arise because of the variability in subsurface conditions along the sizeable lengths of track that exist. One very important issue is the need for significant upkeep and maintenance for railways passing over areas of poor soil conditions as a result of continuous deformation and a lack of stiffness from the foundation. One general solution for lack of substructure integrity has been confinement, applied through a variety of reinforcement types, including geocell. To investigate the effectiveness of geocell confinement on substructure integrity, a series of embankment model tests with different configurations of geocell placement (one layer and two layers of geocell) were constructed and loaded monotonically and cyclically for comparison with unreinforced, control tests. On the completion of these tests, the model embankments were simulated numerically using finite-element procedures. The results, which matched reasonably well, were then used as validation for a parametric study, observing the effects of less competent geocell material, gravel, and foundation conditions and their implications. The tests and numerical simulations demonstrate that geocell confinement effectively increased stiffness and strength of a gravel embankment while reducing vertical settlement and lateral spreading. Additionally, the parametric study shows that the use of geocell provides a composite mattressing effect that distributes subgrade stress more uniformly than without reinforcement, increasing bearing capacity and reducing settlement, especially on soft foundations. The results suggested that in some site conditions, use of geocell might be an economical alternative to frequent maintenance and/or lower train speeds.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge information provided by Dr. Allan Zarembski of Zeta Tech; Steve Chrismer, Principal Engineer, Track Geometry and Roadbed Improvement of Amtrak; and PRS Mediterranean for partial support of this study. Additionally, the authors thank the reviewers for very useful, constructive, and thoughtful comments on the submission.

References

ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.” D638-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
Chrismer, S. (1997). “Test of Geoweb® to improve track stability over soft subgrade.” Rep. TD 97-045, Technology Department, Association of American Railroads, Washington DC.
Giroud, J. P., and Han, J. (2004). “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads, Part I theoretical development.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(8), 776–786.
Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R. L., Rosen, A., and Yuu, J. (2008). “Technical review of geocell-reinforced base courses over weak subgrade,” Vol. 1.1, Proc., 1st Pan-American Conf. and Exhibition, Cancun, Mexico, 1022–1030.
Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. (2007). ABAQUS user’s manual, version 6.7, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
Indraratna, B., Christie, D., Khabbaz, H., and Salim, W. (2006). “Geotechnical properties of ballast and the role of geosynthetics in rail track stabilisation.” Ground Improv., 10(3), 91–101.
Indraratna, B., Ionescu, D., and Christie, D. (1998). “Shear behaviour of railway ballast based on large scale triaxial testing.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(5), 439–449.
Indraratna, B., Nimbalkar, S., Christie, D., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., and Vinod, J. (2010). “Field assessment of the performance of a ballasted rail track with and without geosynthetics.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 136(7), 907–917.
Indraratna, B., and Salim, W. (2002). “Modelling of particle breakage of coarse aggregates incorporating strength and dilatancy.” Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering, London, 243–252.
Lackenby, J., Indraratna, B., McDowell, G., and Christie, D. (2007). “Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading.” Geotechnique, 57(6), 527–536.
Leshchinsky, B. (2011). “Enhancing ballast performance using geocell confinement.” Proc., Geo-Frontiers 2011, Geo-Institute of ASCE, Dallas, TX, 4693–4072.
Leshchinsky, B., and Ling, H. (2013). “Numerical modeling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement.” Geotext. Geomembranes, 36, 33–43.
Ling, H., Leshchinsky, D., Wang, J. P., Mohri, Y. and Rosen, A. (2009). “Seismic response of geocell retaining walls: Experimental studies.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 135(4), 515–524.
Pokharel, S., et al. (2011). “Accelerated pavement testing of geocell-reinforced unpaved roads over weak subgrade.”10th Int. Conf. on Low-Volume Roads, Journal of Transportation Research Board, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 67–75.
Raymond, G. P. (2001). “Failure and reconstruction of a gantry crane ballasted track.” Can. Geotech. J., 38(3), 507–529.
Selig, E., and Waters, J. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management, Thomas Telford Books, London.
Webster, S. L., and Alford, S. J. (1977). “Investigation of construction concepts for pavement across soft ground.” Rep. S-77-1, Soils and Pavements Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Yang, X. (2010). “Numerical analyses of geocell-reinforced granular soils under static and repeated loads.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Zhou, H., and Wen, X. (2008). “Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil.” Geotextiles Geomembranes, 26(3), 231–238.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 139Issue 2February 2013
Pages: 340 - 352

History

Received: Sep 12, 2011
Accepted: Apr 24, 2012
Published online: Apr 26, 2012
Published in print: Feb 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ben Leshchinsky [email protected]
Assistant Professor. Dept. of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State Univ., 280 Peavy Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331; formerly, Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hoe Ling, M.ASCE
Professor of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share