The authors would like to correct an error that they made in preparing two plots in their closure that showed the variation of the soil behavior type index () with depth at two sites. Figs. 1(c) and 2(c) in the closure had incorrect profiles. The correct profiles of at these two sites are shown in the revised Figs. 1 and 2. The authors’ findings in the original closure remain the same. As stated previously, although is useful in discriminating between different soil types preliminarily, it provides only an indication of soil type. Soil samples should be retrieved to confirm its applicability on a site-specific basis. Plasticity index (PI) and the water content to liquid limit ratio () are more reliable indexes of liquefaction susceptibility.Fig. 1. Site F profile: (a) CPT tip resistance; (b) SPT ; (c) soil behavior index; (d) PI; and (e) (data from Sancio 2003)Fig. 2. Site A profile: (a) CPT tip resistance; (b) SPT ; (c) soil behavior index; (d) PI; and (e) (data from Sancio 2003)
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.