Cross-Well Radar. I: Experimental Simulation of Cross-Well Tomography and Validation
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 9
Abstract
This paper explains and evaluates the potential and limitations of conducting cross-well radar (CWR) in sandy soils. Implementing the experiment and data collection in the absence of any scattering object, and in the presence of an acrylic plate [a representative of dielectric objects, such as dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) pools, etc.], as a contrasting object in a water-saturated soil is also studied. To be able to image the signature of any object, more than one pair of receiving and transmitting antennas are required. The paper describes a method to achieve repeatable, reliable, and reproducible laboratory results for different transmitter-receiver combinations. Different practical methods were evaluated for collecting multiple-depth data. Similarity of the corresponding results and problems involved in each method are studied and presented. The data show that the frequency response of a saturated coarse-grained soil is smooth due to the continuous and dominant nature of water in saturated soils. The repeatability and potential symmetry of patterns across some borehole axes provide a valuable tool for validation of experimental results. The potential asymmetry across other borehole axes is used as a tool to evaluate the strength of the perturbation on the electromagnetic field due to hidden objects and to evaluate the feasibility of detecting dielectric objects (such as DNAPL pools, etc.) using CWR. The experimental simulation of this paper models a real-life problem in a smaller scale, in a controlled laboratory environment, and within homogeneous soils that are uniformly dry or fully water saturated, with a uniform dielectric property contrast between the inclusion and background. The soil in the field will not be as homogeneous and uniform. The scaling process takes into consideration that as the size is scaled down; the frequency needs to be scaled up. It is noteworthy that this scaling process needs to be extensively studied and validated for future extension of the models to real-field applications. For example, to extend the outcome of this work to the real field, the geometry (antenna size, their separation and inclusion size) needs to be scaled up back to the field size, while soil grains will not. Therefore, soil, water, and air coupling effects and interactions observed at the laboratory scale do not scale up in the field, and may have different unforeseen effects that require extensive study.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Geller, J. T., and Harris, J. M. (2004). “The dielectric properties of granular Media saturated with DNAPL/water mixtures.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(17), L17501.
Blackhawk Geoservices Inc. (2001). “Integrated geophysical detection of DNAPL source zones.” Final Rep. to SERDP (Strategic Environmental Research & Development Program), http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA409159⟩ (Feb. 2008).
Bradford, J. H., and Wu, Y. (2007). “Instantaneous spectral analysis: Time-frequency mapping via wavelet matching with application to 3D GPR contaminated site characterization.” The Leading Edge, 26, 1018–1023.
Daily, W., and Lytle, J. (1983). “Geophysical tomography.” J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 35, 423–442.
Daily, W. D., and Ramirez, A. L. (1984). “In situ porosity distribution using geophysical tomography.” Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 614–616.
Eppstein, M. J., and Dougherty, D. E. (1998). “Efficient three-dimensional data inversion: Soil characterization and moisture monitoring from cross-well ground-penetrating radar at a Vermont test site.” Water Resour. Res., 34(8), 1889–1900.
Farid, M., Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Rappaport, C. M. (2003). “Modeling borehole dipole antenna patterns for cross-well radar DNAPL imaging.” Electronic Proc., 12th Pan-American Conf. on Soil Mech. and Foundation Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Farid, M., Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Rappaport, C. M. (2006). “Calibration and validation of a laboratory experimental setup for CWR in sand.” Geotech. Test. J., 29(2), 158–167.
Kurson, C. (2006) “Minimally invasive microwave measurements for modeling of a sandy soil properties.” MS thesis, Northeastern Univ., Boston.
Lager, D. L., and Lytle, R. J. (1977). “Determining a subsurface electromagnetic profile from high frequency measurements by applying reconstruction algorithms.” Radio Sci., 12, 249–260.
Lane, J. W., Wright, D. L., and Halni, F. P. (2000). “Borehole radar tomography using saline tracer injections to image fluid flow in fractured rock.” Profiles of Federally Funded Projects, USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology Program, EPA 542-R-98-020, ⟨http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/bgas/imaging⟩ (Jan. 2003).
Olsson, O., Falk, L., Forslund, O., Lundmark, L., and Sandberg, E. (1992). “Borehole radar applied to the characterization of hydraulically conductive fracture zones in crystalline rock.” Geophys. Prospect., 40, 109–142.
Rector, J. W. (1995). “Cross-well methods: Where are we, where are we going?” Geophysics, 60(3), 629–630.
von Hippel, A. R. (1954). Dielectrics materials and applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Weast, R. C. (1975). CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 55th Ed., CRC, Cleveland.
Zhan, He, Farid, A. M., Alshawabkeh, A. N., Raemer, H., and Rappaport, C. M. (2007). “Validated half-space Green’s function formulation for Born approximation for cross-well radar sensing of contaminants.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 45(8), 2423–2428.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2007
Accepted: Sep 23, 2008
Published online: Feb 20, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.