Impacts of Excess Pore-Water Pressure on Dynamic Properties of Saturated Clay
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 9
Abstract
For equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis, both shear modulus and damping ratio are critical input factors. The elastic modulus and damping ratio of saturated soft clay are usually determined using cyclic triaxial tests. However, the dynamic behaviors of saturated clay are affected by excess pore-water pressure induced under cyclic loading. Therefore, the evolutions of both elastic modulus and damping ratio, under cyclic triaxial tests with and without drainage, are the main focus of the investigation. Two types of cyclic triaxial tests were performed, in which the primary distinction is whether the excess pore-water pressure caused by the previous stage’s cyclic loading is released prior to the application of the next stage’s cyclic loading. The impacts of several parameters, such as effective confining pressure and excess pore-water pressure, were investigated. As the effective confining pressure increases, so does the maximum elastic modulus. Excess pore-water pressure has a significant effect on maximum elastic modulus. The maximum elastic modulus under the condition with drainage increases linearly with that obtained without drainage. Besides that, the variations of normalized elastic modulus with effective confining pressure are negligible under the condition without drainage, while the impact of effective confining pressure is more apparent in the condition of drainage. Nevertheless, the influence of effective confining pressure on the damping ratio can be ignored over the range of axial strain. The damping ratio without drainage is higher than that obtained under the condition with drainage. Based on that, the variation of normalized elastic modulus versus axial strain can be depicted by an empirical function, while the evolution of the damping ratio is represented by a hyperbolic model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51909259, and 52079135); and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2021325).
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- a, b, c, d, α, β
- fitting parameters;
- D
- damping ratio of saturated soft clay;
- E
- elastic modulus of saturated soft clay (MPa);
- Emax
- maximum elastic modulus (MPa);
- Emax,a
- maximum elastic modulus without drainage (MPa);
- Emax,d
- maximum elastic modulus with drainage (MPa);
- qd
- deviator stress (kPa);
- ɛd
- axial strain;
- ɛ
- maximum axial strain; and
- effective confining pressure (kPa).
References
Cai, Y., Q. Dong, J. Wang, C. Gu, and C. Xu. 2015. “Measurement of small strain shear modulus of clean and natural sands in saturated condition using bender element test.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 76: 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.013.
Chattaraj, R., and A. Sengupta. 2016. “Liquefaction potential and strain dependent dynamic properties of Kasai River sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 90: 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.023.
Chen, G., Z. Zhou, H. Pan, T. Sun, and X. Li. 2016. “The influence of undrained cyclic loading patterns and consolidation states on the deformation features of saturated fine sand over a wide strain range.” Eng. Geol. 204: 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.01.014.
Cheng, K., J. Zhang, Y. Miao, B. Ruan, and T. Peng. 2019. “The effect of plastic fines on the shear modulus and damping ratio of silty sands.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 78 (8): 5865–5876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01522-1.
Cho, W., and R. J. Finno. 2010. “Stress–strain responses of block samples of compressible Chicago glacial clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000186.
Finno, R. J., and W. Cho. 2011. “Recent stress-history effects on compressible Chicago glacial clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (3): 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000434.
Gu, C., Z. Gu, Y. Cai, J. Wang, and D. Ling. 2017. “Dynamic modulus characteristics of saturated clays under variable confining pressure.” Can. Geotech. J. 54: 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0441.
Hanumantharao, C., and G. V. Ramana. 2008. “Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India.” J. Earth Syst. Sci. 117: 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2.
Hardin, B. O., and W. L. Black. 1969. “Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay (closure).” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 95 (6): 1531–1537. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001364.
Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich. 1972. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Measurement and parameter effects (Terzaghi Leture).” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (6): 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001756.
Hoyos, L. R., A. J. Puppala, and P. Chainuwat. 2004. “Dynamic properties of chemically stabilized sulfate rich clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:2(153).
Huang, J., J. Chen, Y. Lu, S. Yi, H. Cheng, and L. Cui. 2020. “Deformation behaviors and dynamic backbone curve model of saturated soft clay under bidirectional cyclic loading.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (4): 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001628.
Hsiao, D.-H., and V. T.-A. Phan. 2016. “Evaluation of static and dynamic properties of sand–fines mixtures through the state and equivalent state parameters.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 84: 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.006.
Kagawa, T. 1992. “Moduli and damping factors of soft marine clays.” J. Geotech. Eng. 118 (9): 1360–1375. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:9(1360).
Kottke, A. R., A. Keene, Y. Wang, B. Shin, K. H. II Stokoe, and M. R. Lewis. 2017. “In situ and laboratory measured dynamic properties of a marine clay.” In Proc., Geotechnical Frontiers 2017: Geotechnical Materials, Modeling, and Testing, Geotechnical Special Publication 280, edited by Thomas L. Brandon and Richard J. Valentine, 337–346. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kumar, S. S., A. M. Krishna, and A. Dey. 2017. “Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 99: 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.016.
Liu, X., and J. Yang. 2018. “Shear wave velocity in sand: Effect of grain shape.” Géotechnique 68 (8): 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.T.011.
Liu, Y. 2006. “Study on experimental technology obtained dynamic modulus and damping ratio of soils.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology.
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources). 2019. Standard for geotechnical testing method. GB/T 50123-2019. Beijing: MWR.
Okur, D. V., and A. Ansal. 2007. “Stiffness degradation of natural fine grained soils during cyclic loading.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27: 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.005.
Payan, M., K. Senetakis, A. Khoshghalb, and N. Khalili. 2017. “Effect of gradation and particle shape on small-strain Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of sands.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (5): 04016120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000811.
Sağlam, S., and B. S. Bakır. 2014. “Cyclic response of saturated silts.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 61–62: 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.011.
Saride, S., and T. Dutta. 2016. “Effect of fly-ash stabilization on stiffness modulus degradation of expansive clays.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (12): 04016166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001678.
Sas, W., K. Gabrys, and A. Szymanski. 2017. “Experimental studies of dynamic properties of Quaternary clayey soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 95: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.031.
Senetakis, K., A. Anastasiadis, and K. Pitilakis. 2013. “Normalized shear modulus reduction and damping ratio curves of quartz sand and rhyolitic crushed rock.” Soils Found. 53 (6): 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.10.007.
Stokoe, K. H., II M. B. Darendeli, R. D. Andrus, and L. T. Brown. 1999. “Dynamic soil properties: Laboratory, field and correlation studies.” In Vol. 3 of Proc., 2nd Int. Conf., on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 811–845. Rotterdam, Brookfield: A.A. Balkema.
Stokoe, K. H., II M. B. Darendeli, R. B. Gilbert, F. Y. Menq, and W. K. Choi. 2004. “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves.” In Proc., NSF/PEER Int. Workshop on Uncertainties in Nonlinear Soil Properties and Their Impact on Modeling Dynamic Soil Response. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Subramaniam, P., and S. Banerjee. 2014. “Factors affecting shear modulus degradation of cement treated clay.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 65: 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.013.
Subramaniam, P., and S. Banerjee. 2020. “Dynamic properties of cement-treated marine clay.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (6): 04020065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001673.
Subramaniam, P., S. Banerjee, and T. Ku. 2019. “Shear modulus and damping ratio model for cement treated clay.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (7): 06019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001448.
Sun, L., Y.-q. Cai, C. Gu, J. Wang, and L. Guo. 2015. “Cyclic deformation behaviour of natural K0—Consolidated soft clay under different stress paths.” J. Cent. South Univ. 22: 4828–4836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-3034-4.
Towhata, I. 2008. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Tsai, P. H., and S. H. Ni. 2011. “A study on dynamic properties of cement-stabilized soils.” Adv. Mater. Res. 243–249: 2050–2054. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.2050.
Vardanega, P. J., and M. D. Bolton. 2013. “Stiffness of clays and silts: Normalizing shear modulus and shear strain.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (9): 1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000887.
Wichtmann, T., and T. Triantafyllidis. 2009. “Influence of the grain-size distribution curve of quartz sand on the small-strain shear modulus Gmax.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (10): 1404–1418. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000096.
Yang, J., and X. Q. Gu. 2013. “Shear stiffness of granular material at small strains: Does it depend on grain size?” Géotechnique 63 (2): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.083.
Yang, J., and X. Liu. 2016. “Shear wave velocity and stiffness of sand: The role of non-plastic fines.” Géotechnique 66 (6): 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.205.
Zhang, J., R. D. Andrus, and C. H. Juang. 2005. “Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (4): 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453).
Zhang, Z.-L., and Z.-D. Cui. 2018. “Effect of freezing–thawing on dynamic characteristics of the silty clay under K0-consolidated condition.” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 146: 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.009.
Zhou, W., Y. Chen, G. Ma, L. Yang, and X. Chang. 2017. “A modified dynamic shear modulus model for rockfill materials under a wide range of shear strain amplitudes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92: 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.027.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22 • Issue 9 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 1, 2021
Accepted: Mar 29, 2022
Published online: Jun 29, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 29, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.