Technical Notes
Dec 17, 2021

Reliability Analysis of Modern Geotechnical Codes for the Limit State Design of Sheet Pile Structures Considering Parameter Uncertainties

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 3

Abstract

In this paper, the limit-state and direct probability-based design responses of modern geotechnical codes are characterized according to parametric analyses of geotechnical uncertainty. The reliability levels (β) of the limit-state design (LSD) responses are compared with the prescribed minimum target reliability indices (βT,min) of the codes for a case study that involves the design of an embedded sheet pile structure subjected to water pressure, seepage pressure, and no retained earth pressure. The effect of soil uncertainty, represented by the variabilities of the effective soil friction and the soil unit weight, on the direct probabilistic-based design responses, is analyzed at small- and high-reliability levels (0 ≤ β ≤ 5). The results show that the reliability levels of the LSD responses of the North American and European codes do not fulfill the prescribed βT,min for the overturning and structural failure limit-states. In contrast, for the hydraulic heave limit-state, the prescribed βT,min of the North American codes are widely exceeded. The effects of the uncertainties of the effective soil friction COVϕ′ and the soil unit weight COVγ on the normalized embedment depth (D/H) and the normalized maximum structural bending moment (Mmax/γH3) are also explored relative to the principles of the North American and European codes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The author thank the editor and the three anonymous reviewers who contributed to improving this work. This work was partially supported by the Student–Instructor Fellowship (Dean’s Resolution No. 0057 of 2021) of the Faculty of Engineering, University of Antioquia. The financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Allen, T. M. 2013. “AASHTO geotechnical design specification development in the USA.” In Vol. 1 of Modern geotechnical design codes of practices, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 243–260. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Ang, A. H. S., and W. H. Tang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications in civil & environmental engineering. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Au, S.-k., and Y. Wang. 2014. Engineering risk assessment with subset simulation. Singapore: Wiley.
Baecher, G. B. 1987. Geotechnical risk analysis user’s guide. Rep. No. FHWA/RD-87-001. McLean, VA: FHWA.
Barker, R. M., J. M. Duncan, K. B. Rojiani, P. S. K. Ooi, C. K. Tan, and S. G. Kim. 1991. Manuals for the design of bridge foundations. NCHRP Rep. No. 343. Washington, DC: TRB.
Bica, A. V. D., and C. R. I. Clayton. 1989. “Limit equilibrium design methods for free embedded cantilever walls in granular soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 86 (5): 879–898.
Bolton, M. D. 1993. ““What are partial factors for?” In Int. Symp. on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, edited by N. K. Ovesen, 565–583. DGF Bulletin 10/3. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Geotechnical Society.
Bond, A. 2013. “Implementation and evolution of Eurocode 7.” In Vol. 1 of Modern geotechnical design codes of practice, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 3–14. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bond, A., and A. Harris. 2008. Decoding Eurocode 7. 1st ed. London: CRC Press.
Bowles, J. E. 1997. Foundation analysis and design. 5th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
BSI (British Standard Institution). 1994. Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS 8002:1994. London: BSI.
Cao, Z. J., G. H. Gao, D. Q. Li, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Values of Monte Carlo samples for geotechnical reliability-based design.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety and Risk, edited by J. Ching, D.-Q. Li, and J. Zhang, 86–95. Singapore: Research Publishing.
Caquot, A. I., and J. L. Kerisel. 1948. Tables for the calculation of passive pressure, active pressure and bearing capacity of foundations. 1st ed. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1994. Eurocode 7 geotechnical design. Part 1: General rules. ENV 1997-1:1994E. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2002. Eurocode 0 basis of structural design. EN 1990:2002. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 7 geotechnical design. Part 1: General rules. EN 1997-1:2004. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CGS (Canadian Geotechnical Society). 1978. Canadian foundation engineering manual. Montreal: CGS.
CGS (Canadian Geotechnical Society). 2006. Canadian foundation engineering manual. Calgary, Canada: CGS.
Ching, J., and T. Schweckendiek eds. 2021. State-of-the-art review of inherent variability and uncertainty in geotechnical properties and models. Delft, The Netherlands: ISSMGE Technical Committee 304.
Christian, J. T., and G. B. Baecher. 2011. “Unresolved problems in geotechnical risk and reliability.” In Georisk 2011, edited by C. H. Juang, K. K. Phoon, A. J. Puppala, R. A. Green, and G. A. Fenton, 50–63. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Coulomb, C. A. 1776. “Essai Sur Une Application Des Regles de Maximia et Minimis a Quelques Problèmes de Statique Relatifs a l’architecture.” In Mémoires de la Mathématique et de Physique, présentés a l’Académie Royale des Sciences, par divers savants, et lus dans ces Assemblées, 3–8. Paris: L’Imprimérie Royale.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2000. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6:00. Ontario: CSA International.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code CSA S6:14. Mississauga, Canada: CSA Group.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6:19. Toronto: CSA Group.
Daryani, K. E., and H. Mohamad. 2014. “System reliability-based analysis of cantilever retaining walls embedded in granular soils.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 8 (3): 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2014.937583.
Day, P. W., and J. V. Retief. 2009. “Provision for geotechnical design in SANS 10160.” In Background to SANS 10160: Basis of structural design and actions for buildings and industrial structures, edited by J. V. Retief and P. E. Dunaiski, 189–218. Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN Media Stellenbosch.
Dithinde, M., and J. V. Retief. 2016. “Semi-probabilistic geotechnical limit state design: Salient features and implementation roadmap for Southern Africa.” In Proc., First Southern African Geotechnical Conf., edited by S. W. Jacobsz, 129–134. Sun City, South Africa: Taylor & Francis.
Duncan, J. M. 2000. “Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (4): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:4(307).
Duncan, J. M., and M. D. Sleep. 2015. “Evaluating reliability in geotechnical engineering.” In Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering, edited by K.-K. Phoon and J. Ching, 131–178. London: CRC Press.
Farrell, E. R., and T. L. L. Orr. 1998. “Safety of retaining walls with high water loadings when designed to Eurocode 7 using partial factors.” Ground Eng. 31 (10): 37–40.
Fenton, G. A. 2013. “Geotechnical design code development in Canada.” In Vol. 1 of Modern geotechnical design codes of practice, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 277–294. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Fenton, G. A., F. Naghibi, D. Dundas, R. J. Bathurst, and D. V. Griffiths. 2016. “Reliability-based geotechnical design in 2014 Canadian highway bridge design code.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (2): 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0158.
Forrest, W. S., and T. L. L. Orr. 2010. “Reliability of shallow foundations designed to Eurocode 7.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 4 (4): 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499511003646484.
Gaba, A., B. Simpson, W. Powrie, and D. Breadman. 2003. Embedded retaining walls: Guidance for economical design. CIRIA Rep. No. C580. London: CIRIA.
Gao, G.-H., D.-Q. Li, Z.-J. Cao, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang. 2019. “Full probabilistic design of earth retaining structures using generalized subset simulation.” Comput. Geotech. 112 (8): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.04.020.
Hansen, J. B. 1953. “Earth pressure calculation.” Ph.D. thesis, The Institution of Danish Civil Engineers, Danmarks Geotekniske Institut.
ISE (Institute of Structural Engineers). 2013. Manual for the geotechnical design of structures to Eurocode 7. London: ISE.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2015. ISO 2394:2015 general principles on reliability for structures. ISO/TC 98/SC 2. 4th ed. Geneva: ISO.
Knappett, J. A., and R. F. Craig. 2012. Craig’s soil mechanics. 8th ed. London: CRC Press.
Low, B. K. 2017. “Insights from reliability-based design to complement load and resistance factor design approach.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (11): 04017089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001795.
Low, B. K., and K.-K. Phoon. 2015. “Reliability-based design and its complementary role to Eurocode 7 design approach.” Comput. Geotech. 65 (4): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.11.011.
Marin, R. J., and Á. J. Mattos. 2020. “Physically-based landslide susceptibility analysis using Monte-Carlo simulation in a tropical mountain basin.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 14 (3): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1633582.
Mattos, Á. J., J. C. Viviescas, and J. P. Osorio. 2021. “Reliability comparative analysis of codes for the design of cantilever sheet pile walls: Basis for studying the principles of international standards.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (5): 04021064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002009.
Mattos, Á. J., and R. J. Marin. 2020. “Reliability analysis of bored-pile wall stability considering parameter uncertainties.” TecnoLógicas 23 (48): 163–179. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.1433.
Nowak, A. S., and K. R. Collins. 2012. Reliability of structures. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.
Orr, T. L. L. 2013. “Implementing Eurocode 7 to achieve reliable geotechnical designs.” In Vol. 1 of Modern geotechnical design codes of practice: Implementation, application and development, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 72–86. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Orr, T. L. L., and D. Breysse. 2008. “Eurocode 7 and reliability-based design.” In Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: Computations and applications, edited by K. K. Phoon, 298–343. London: CRC Press.
Orr, T. L. L., and E. R. Farrell. 1999. Geotechnical design to Eurocode 7. London: Springer.
Phoon, K.-K. 2017. “Role of reliability calculations in geotechnical design.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 11 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2016.1265653.
Phoon, K.-K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Phoon, K.-K., J. V. Retief, J. Ching, M. Dithinde, T. Schweckendiek, Y. Wang, and L. M. Zhang. 2016. “Some observations on ISO2394: 2015 annex D (reliability of geotechnical structures).” Struct. Saf. 62: 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.05.003.
Retief, J. V., M. Dithinde, and K. K. Phoon. 2016. “General principles on reliability according to ISO2394.” In Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394, edited by K. K. Phoon and J. V. Retief, 33–48. London: CRC Press.
Retief, J. V., and P. E. Dunaiski. 2009. Background to SANS 10160: Basis of structural design and actions for buildings and industrial structures. 1st ed. Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN Media Stellenbosch.
SABS (South African Bureau of Standards). 2011. Basis of geotechnical design and actions for buildings and industrial structures. SANS 10160-5. Pretoria, South Africa: SABS Standard Division.
Schneider, H. R. 1997. “Definition and determination of characteristic soil properties.” In Proc., 14th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (XIV ICSMFE), 2271–2274. Hamburg, Germany: Balkema.
Simpson, B. 2007. “Approaches to ULS design—The merits of design approach 1 in Eurocode 7.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety & Risk, edited by H. Hongwei and L. Zhang, 527–538. Shanghai, China: Tongji Univ.
Simpson, B. 2011. “Reliability in geotechnical design—Some fundamentals.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety & Risk, edited by N. Vogt, B. Schuppener, D. Straub, and G. Brau, 393–399. Munich, Germany: Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute.
Simpson, B. 2013. “British choices of geotechnical design approach and partial factors for EC7.” In Vol. 1 of Modern geotechnical design codes of practice, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 1–34. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Simpson, B., and W. Powrie. 2001. “Embedded retaining walls: Theory, practice and understanding.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2505–2524. Istanbul, Turkey: CRC Press.
Tang, W. H., D. L. Woodford, and J. H. Pelletier. 1990. “Performance reliability of offshore piles.” In Proc., 22nd Offshore Technology Conf., 299–307. Houston, TX: OTC.
Teng, W. C. 1962. Foundation design. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 1986. Engineering and design: Seepage analysis and control for dams. EM Rep. No. 1110-2-1901. Washington, DC: Dept. of Army.
USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 1997. Engineering and design: Introduction to probability and reliability methods for use in geotechnical engineering. ETL Rep. No. 1110-2-547. Washington, DC: Dept. of Army.
US Department of Navy. 1986. Foundations and earth structures (Design manual 7.02). Virginia: Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC).
Viviescas, J. C., Á. J. Mattos, and J. P. Osorio. 2021. “Uncertainty quantification in the bearing capacity estimation for shallow foundations in sandy soils.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 15 (3): 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1753782.
Wang, Y. 2013. “MCS-based probabilistic design of embedded sheet pile walls.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 7 (3): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.765286.
Wang, Y., S.-K. Au, and F. H. Kulhawy. 2011. “Expanded reliability-based design approach for drilled shafts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (2): 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000421.
Wang, Y., and Z. J. Cao. 2015. “Practical reliability analysis and design by Monte-Carlo simulation in spreadsheet.” In Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering, edited by K.-K. Phoon and J. Ching, 301–335. London: CRC Press.
Wang, Y., T. Schweckendiek, W. Gong, T. Zhao, and K.-K. Phoon. 2016. “Direct probability-based design methods.” In Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394, edited by K.-K. Phoon and J. V. Retief, 194–226. London: CRC Press.
Zhang, L., W. H. Tang, and C. W. W. Ng. 2001. “Reliability of axially loaded driven pile groups.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (12): 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:12(1051).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Mar 1, 2021
Accepted: Oct 11, 2021
Published online: Dec 17, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 17, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Fellow, Environmental School, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-3288. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share