Effect of Tamping Conditions on the Shear Strength of Tailings
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22, Issue 3
Abstract
Moist tamping (MT) is likely the most common sample preparation technique used in the study of tailings, owing to the ability of MT to produce loose, contractive specimens. While the preparation of such loose samples to identify the critical state line is well established, MT is also frequently used to study trends of tailings behavior across a range of states. Preparation of dense states using MT may require significant compactive effort, the effects of which have not been studied in detail. A series of triaxial compression tests were carried out on two gradations of tailings to assess the effect of compacting to dense initial states on the resulting undrained shear behavior. This indicated that the process of compacting a specimen to a dense initial state may result in significant increases to peak undrained shear strength compared to samples prepared initially loose that achieved the same state at a range of consolidation stresses. This outcome emphasizes the importance of applying caution during sample preparation to avoid potentially unrealistic peak undrained strengths occurring during testing that are artifacts of the preparation procedure and unlikely to be relevant to in situ conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ayala, J., A. Fourie, and D. Reid. 2020. “Cone penetration testing on silty tailings using a new small calibration chamber.” Géotech. Lett. 10 (4): 492–497. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.20.00037.
Baziar, M. H., and R. Dobry. 1995. “Residual strength and large-deformation potential of loose silty sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (12): 896–906. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(896).
Been, K., and M. G. Jefferies. 1985. “A state parameter for sands.” Géotechnique 35: 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99.
Carraro, J. A. H., and M. Prezzi. 2008. “A new slurry-based method of preparation of specimens of sand containing fines.” Geotech. Test. J. 31 (1): 1–11.
Chang, N., G. Heymann, and C. Clayton. 2011. “The effect of fabric on the behaviour of gold tailings.” Géotechnique 61: 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.066.
Disfani, M. M., A. Mohammandinia, A. Arulrajah, S. Horpibulsuk, and M. Leong. 2021. “Lightly stability loose sands with alkai-activated fly ash in deep mixing applications.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (3): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001958.
Frost, J., and J. Park. 2003. “A critical assessment of the moist tamping technique.” Geotech. Test. J. 26: 57–70.
Høeg, K., R. Dyvik, and G. Sandbækken. 2000. “Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126: 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(606).
Jefferies, M. G., and K. Been. 2015. Soil liquefaction: A critical state approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Jefferies, M., N. R. Morgenstern, D. V. Van Zyl, and J. Wates. 2019. “Report on NTSF embankment failure, Cadia Valley operations, for Ashurst Australia.” Independent Technical Review Board. Accessed May 1, 2019. http://www.newcrest.com.au/investors/market-releases.
Kwa, K., and D. Airey. 2017. “Effect of fines on liquefaction behaviour in well-graded materials.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (10): 1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0016.
Ladd, R. 1978. “Preparing test specimens using undercompaction.” Geotech. Test. J. 1: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J.
Li, X. S., and Y. Wang. 1998. “Linear representation of steady-state line for sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124: 1215–1217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:12(1215).
Morgenstern N. R., S. G. Vick, C. B. Viotti, and B. D. Watts. 2016. “Fundão Tailings Dam Review Panel: Report in the immediate causes of the failure of the Fundão Dam.” New York: Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.
Mujah, D., M. A. Shahin, L. Cheng, and A. Karrech. 2021. “Experimental and analytical study on geomechanical behaviour of biocemented sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (8): 04021126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002105.
Pan, K., Z. X. Yang, and T. T. Xu. 2018. “Impact of static preshearing on undrained anisotropy and shear characteristics of sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (12): 04018162.
Prasanna, R., and S. Sivathayalan. 2017. “Effect of moist tamping water content on the shear strength of soil.” In Proc., 70th Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Canada: Canadian Geotechnical Society.
Reid, D. 2021. “Some considerations on the engineering performance of subaqueously-deposits silts.” In Mine Waste Tailings 2021 Conf., 203–216. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Reid, D., and R. Fanni. 2020. “A comparison of intact and reconstituted samples of silt tailings.” Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.P.020.
Reid, D., R. Fanni, and P. DiDonna. 2021a. “The effect of tamping conditions on undrained shear strengths of a non-plastic sandy silt tailings.” Can. Geotech. J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0269.
Reid, D., R. Fanni, and A. Fourie. 2021b. “Some considerations when preparing thickened tailings for shear strength testing in the laboratory from a slurry.” In Proc., 24th Conf. on Paste, Thickened, and Filtered Tailings. Perth, Australia: Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
Reid, D., R. Fanni, K. Koh, and I. Orea. 2018. “Characterisation of a subaqueously deposited silt iron ore tailings.” Géotech. Lett. 8 (4): 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00105.
Reid, D., A. B. Fourie, and S. Moggach. 2019. “Characterization of gold tailings with hypersaline pore fluid.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (4): 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0579.
Reid, D., et al. 2020. “Results of a critical state line test round robin program.” Géotechnique 71 (7): 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.373.
Robertson, P. K., L. de Melo, D. J. Williams, and G. W. Wilson. 2019. Report of the expert panel on the technical causes of the failure of Feijão Dam I. New York: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. http://www.b1technicalinvestigation.com/.
Shuttle, D. A., and J. Cunning. 2007. “Liquefaction potential of silts from CPTu.” Can. Geotech. J. 44 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-086.
Sladen, J. A., and G. Handford. 1987. “A potential systematic error in laboratory testing of very loose sands.” Can. Geotech. J. 24: 3.
Vaid, Y. P., and S. Sivathayalan. 2000. “Fundamental factors affecting liquefaction susceptibility of sands.” Can. Geotech. J. 37 (3): 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-040.
Vaid, Y. P., and S. Sivathayalan. 2001. “Discussion of “strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens” by K. Høeg, R. Dyvik, and G. Sandbækken.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (11): 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:11(991).
Wu, S., B. Li, and J. Chu. 2021. “Stress-dilatancy behavior of MICP-treated sand.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (3): 04020264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001923.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 22 • Issue 3 • March 2022
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 26, 2021
Accepted: Sep 12, 2021
Published online: Dec 17, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 17, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- David Reid, Riccardo Fanni, Andy Fourie, Model Uncertainty in Below-Slope Stress Conditions: Experimental and Numerical Investigation, Geo-Risk 2023, 10.1061/9780784484999.025, (238-247), (2023).
- Riccardo Fanni, David Reid, Andy Fourie, Effect of principal stress direction on the instability of sand under the constant shear drained stress path, Géotechnique, 10.1680/jgeot.22.00062, (1-17), (2022).
- Riccardo Fanni, David Reid, Andy Fourie, On reliability of inferring liquefied shear strengths from simple shear testing, Soils and Foundations, 10.1016/j.sandf.2022.101151, 62, 3, (101151), (2022).