Nail Forces and Locus of Maximum Tension of Nailed Cut Subjected to Seismic Excitations: A Calculus Approach with Log-Spiral Failure Surface
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 11
Abstract
A vertical cut reinforced with inclined nails subjected to seismic loading was analyzed using the modified pseudodynamic approach, assuming a log-spiral failure surface. A novel calculus-based methodology has been devised to obtain the maximum individual nail force demands and locus of maximum tension, which directly affect nail length in the passive and active zone. The influence of depth of cut to wavelength ratio, nail declination, surcharge, wave amplitudes, soil’s shear strength parameters, and damping ratio were reported. The maximum nail forces required to restrict the failure of a cut have been observed to increase nonlinearly with the depth of nails. The lower angle of shearing resistance, stronger horizontal base acceleration, and closeness of frequency level to fundamental shear wave frequency claimed additional nail lengths in both active and passive zones highlighting their significance in the stability of nailed cut. Practicing engineers can use proposed expressions by employing inexpensive spreadsheet software rather than costly finite element or slices-based commercial software.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the QIP initiative administered by AICTE, New Delhi for a scholarship to the first author and the Government of Maharashtra State (India) for deputation of the first author for this research work. The writers gratefully acknowledge four anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions on this research.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- ah0, av0
- amplitude of horizontal and vertical acceleration at the base of the slope;
- c
- soil’s cohesion intercept;
- horizontal and vertical components of cohesive force ;
- Fq
- force implied by live load surcharge (q);
- FSPO
- factor of safety against pullout failure;
- FSOS
- overall stability factor against rotational failure;
- fa
- soil amplification factor;
- G
- shear modulus of the soil;
- H
- nailed cut depth;
- i, j
- counters used for depths and nails;
- in
- nail declination angle;
- kh
- ah0/g;
- kv
- av0/g;
- ks1, ks2, kp1, kp2
- wave numbers related to S wave and P wave;
- Lz
- length of a horizontal differential strip;
- Mc
- total moment of cohesive forces about pole O;
- Qh, Qv
- horizontal and vertical inertia force;
- q
- live load surcharge intensity;
- R
- reaction by passive zone;
- r, θ
- polar coordinates of a point on log-spiral FS;
- Sv
- vertical nail spacing;
- Teq
- total nail force demand;
- Teq,provided
- total support force capacity of designed nail system;
- dimensionless force demand of jth nail corresponding to θf,m and tm;
- dimensionless maximum force demand of jth nail corresponding to ;
- t
- time;
- tm
- time corresponding to maximum ;
- time corresponding to ;
- uh, uv
- horizontal and vertical displacements;
- Vs, Vp
- velocity of S wave and P wave in the soil;
- W
- weight of failure wedge;
- xspiral,
- x-coordinate of a point on FS and LMT with Point B as an origin;
- , , , ,
- lever arms of various forces about O;
- z
- depth variable measured from the top of a nailed cut;
- zjh
- depth of jth nail’s head;
- φ
- soil’s angle of shearing resistance;
- γ
- soil’s unit weight;
- η1, ηs
- viscosities of the soil;
- λ
- first Lame’s constant;
- λs, λp
- S-wave and P-wave wavelengths;
- ρ
- soil’s density;
- ωs, ωp
- S- and P-wave circular frequency of motion; and
- ξs, ξp
- damping ratios of soil in response to S wave and P wave.
References
Ambraseys, N. N., and K. A. Simpson. 1995. Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Rep. ESEE-95/1. London: Imperial College.
Anthoine, A. 1990. “Une méthode pour le dimensionnement à la rupture des ouvrages en sols renforcés.” [In French.] Revue Française de Géotechnique 50: 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/1990050005.
API. 1993. Recommended practice for planning designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms. 2nd ed. Working Stress Design. RP 2A-WSD. Washington, DC: API.
Basha, B. M., and G. L. S. Babu. 2010. “Reliability assessment of internal stability of reinforced soil structures: A pseudo-dynamic approach.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (5): 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.007.
Basudhar, P. K., Anubhav, and M. R. Lakshminarayana. 2017. “Three-dimensional limit-equilibrium stability analyses of slopes and effect of inclusion of soil nails.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (9): 04017067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000932.
Bellezza, I. 2014. “A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 32 (2): 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9734-y.
Bellezza, I. 2015. “Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 33 (4): 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1.
Bozorgnia, Y., and K. W. Campbell. 2004. “The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra.” J. Earthquake Eng. 8 (2): 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350486.
Briddle, R. J. 1989. “Soil nailing—Analysis and design.” Ground Eng. 22 (6): 52–56.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. IS 1893(Part 1). New Delhi, India: BIS.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance: Part 1: General rules: Seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8:2005. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2011. Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils: Part 2: Soil nail design. BS 8006-2:2011. London: BSI.
Cheng, Y. M., and C. K. Lau. 2014. Slope stability analysis and stabilization: New methods and insight. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Choudhury, D., and S. S. Nimbalkar. 2006. “Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24 (5): 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-1134-x.
Choudhury, D., and S. S. Nimbalkar. 2008. “Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudodynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech. 8 (3): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:3(169).
ENPC (Presses de I’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées). 1991. Clouterre soil nailing recommendations—1991 for designing, calculating, constructing and inspecting earth support systems using soil nailing. Paris: ENPC.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356:2000. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Garzón-Roca, J., V. Capa, F. J. Torrijo, and J. Company. 2019. “Designing soil-nailed walls using the Amherst wall considering problematic issues during execution and service life.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (7): 05019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001453.
GEO (Geotechnical Engineering Office). 2017. Geoguide: Guide to soil nail design and construction. Hong Kong: Civil Engineering and Development Dept.
Gosavi, M., S. Saran, and S. Mittal. 2009. “Pseudo-static analysis of soil nailed excavations.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 27 (4): 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9258-z.
Hong, Y., R. Chen, C. Wu, and J. Chen. 2005. “Shaking table tests and stability analysis of steep nailed slopes.” Can. Geotech. J. 42 (5): 1264–1279. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-055.
Jewell, R. A., and M. J. Pedley. 1992. “Analysis for soil reinforcement with bending stiffness.” J. Geotech. Eng. 118 (10): 1505–1528. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:10(1505).
Juran, B. I., G. Baudrand, S. Member, K. Farrag, and V. Elias. 1990. “Kinematical limit analysis for design of soil-nailed structures.” J. Geotech. Eng. 116 (1): 54–72.
Kim, J. S., and R. M. Barker. 2002. “Effect of live load surcharge on retaining walls and abutments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (10): 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:10(803).
Kim, J. S., J. Y. Kim, and S. R. Lee. 1997. “Analysis of soil nailed earth slope by discrete element method.” Comput. Geotech. 20 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(96)00010-9.
Kokane, A. K., V. A. Sawant, and J. P. Sahoo. 2020. “Seismic stability analysis of nailed vertical cut using modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 137: 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106294.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lazarte, C. A., H. Robinson, J. E. Gómez, A. Baxter, A. Cadden, and R. Berg. 2015. Geotechnical engineering circular no.7: Soil nail walls—Reference manual. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Lin, P., R. J. Bathurst, and J. Liu. 2017. “Statistical evaluation of the FHWA simplified method and modifications for predicting soil nail loads.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001614.
Ling, H. I., D. Leshchinsky, and E. B. Perry. 1997. “Seismic design and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures.” Géotechnique 47 (5): 933–952. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.5.933.
Mikola, R. G., G. Candia, and N. Sitar. 2016. “Seismic earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls in cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (10): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507.
Nimbalkar, S. S., D. Choudhury, and J. N. Mandal. 2006. “Seismic stability of reinforced-soil wall by pseudo-dynamic method.” Geosynth. Int. 13 (3): 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2006.13.3.111.
Nouri, H., A. Fakher, and C. J. F. P. Jones. 2006. “Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (3): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.004.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2017. “Effect of dynamic soil properties and frequency content of harmonic excitation on the internal stability of reinforced soil retaining structure.” Geotext. Geomembr. 45 (5): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.07.003.
Patra, C. R., and P. K. Basudhar. 2005. “Optimum design of nailed soil slopes.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 23 (3): 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-2146-7.
Qin, C., and S. C. Chian. 2018. “Seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced walls with variable excitation and soil properties: A discretization-based kinematic analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 102: 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.012.
Ruan, X., X. Guo, Y. S. Luo, and S. Sun. 2017. “Seismic design of bilinear geosynthetic-reinforced slopes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 100: 454–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.020.
Sarangi, P., and P. Ghosh. 2016. “Seismic analysis of nailed vertical excavation using pseudo-dynamic approach.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 15 (4): 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0353-x.
Sharma, M., D. Choudhury, M. Samanta, S. Sarkar, and V. R. Annapareddy. 2020. “Analysis of helical soil nailed walls under static and seismic conditions.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (6): 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0240.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and P. Punetha. 2019. “Experimental investigation and modeling of pullout response of soil nails in cohesionless medium.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (3): 04019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001372.
Srikar, G., and S. Mittal. 2020. “Seismic analysis of retaining wall subjected to surcharge: A modified pseudodynamic approach.” Int. J. Geomech. 20 (9): 06020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001780.
Steedman, R. S., and X. Zeng. 1990. “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Géotechnique 40 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103.
Tufenkjian, M. R., and M. Vucetic. 2000. “Dynamic failure mechanism of soil-nailed excavation models in centrifuge.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (3): 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:3(227).
Wei, W. B., and Y. M. Cheng. 2010. “Soil nailed slope by strength reduction and limit equilibrium methods.” Comput. Geotech. 37 (5): 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.03.008.
Yang, T., J. F. Zou, and Q. J. Pan. 2020. “Three-dimensional seismic stability of slopes reinforced by soil nails.” Comput. Geotech. 127: 103768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103768.
Ye, X., S. Wang, X. Xiao, S. Sloan, and D. Sheng. 2019. “Numerical study for compaction-grouted soil nails with multiple grout bulbs.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (2): 04018193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001342.
Yin, J. H., C. Y. Hong, and W. H. Zhou. 2012. “Simplified analytical method for calculating the maximum shear stress of nail–soil interface.” Int. J. Geomech. 12 (3): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000151.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 19, 2020
Accepted: Aug 6, 2021
Published online: Sep 15, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.