Technical Papers
Mar 12, 2021

Reliability Comparative Analysis of Codes for the Design of Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls: Basis for Studying the Principles of International Standards

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21, Issue 5

Abstract

In geotechnical engineering, the design of cantilever sheet pile walls is one of the most important and complex tasks due to the use of different limit equilibrium design methodologies to estimate the depth of embedment. In some countries, official codes do not fully cover cantilever sheet pile wall design, so designers tend to adopt foreign codes and manuals generally calibrated to the local conditions. In this paper, the performance of several combinations of limit equilibrium design methodologies from international codes and manuals are evaluated using a proposed multiphase Monte Carlo simulation-based probabilistic design procedure. The results show that the direct implication of the safety factors and soil/wall friction on D/H is related to a significant change of the relative degree of conservatism of codes and manual design methodologies from high to small probability levels. It is found that even when the results of several codes and manuals methodologies agree, their implementation does not produce a design with a low risk of failure, especially for those methodologies that involve the European limit state design (LSD) approach. It is evidenced that for methodologies with unfactored passive pressures, the uncertainty in the response may not be calculated in a mechanically consistent way through reliability analysis. Finally, it is determined that the effect of soil variability in the depth of embedment is not linear when an increment of uncertainty is incorporated into the design, especially for the design combination constituted by the Hansen method and the North American LSD approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author by request (i.e., MS Excel spreadsheet with deterministic model), while others may only be provided with restrictions (i.e., uncertainty model).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support to this research project, under the National Doctoral Grant Scheme No. 727 of 2015, provided by the Administrative Department of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Colombia – Colciencias. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Andrew Lochaden of Golder Associates and Mr. Ricardo A. Trujillo of Hatch for advising on the use and practicalities of the Australian and Canadian standards.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A
analytical solution based on CEN (2004) Annex C;
C
Coulomb;
C&K
Caquot & Kerisel;
CLm
minimum confidence level;
CDF
Cumulative Density Function;
COV
coefficient of variation;
(D/H)m
minimum normalized design depth of embedment;
DA1C2
Design Approach 1 Combination 2;
DA2
Design Approach 2;
DoU
Degree of Understanding;
D/H
final normalized depth of embedment;
H
free height of the wall;
LEM
Limit Equilibrium Method;
LRFD
Load and Resistance Factor Design;
LSD
Limit State Design;
MCS
Monte Carlo Simulation;
PDF
Probability Density Function;
R
Rankine;
TL
tolerance level;
δa
angle of soil/wall friction at the active side;
δp
angle of soil/wall friction at the passive side;
δmin
minimum angle of soil/wall friction;
δmax
maximum angle of soil/wall friction; and
ΔD
safety factor on design depth of embedment.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AIS (Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica). 2010. Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sísmo Resistente (NSR-10). Bogotá, DC, Colombia: Ministerio de ambiente, vivienda y desarrollo territorial.
Allen, T. M. 2013. “AASHTO geotechnical design specification development in the USA.” In Modern geotechnical design codes of practises, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 243–260. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications in civil & environmental engineering. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
AS (Australian Standard). 2002. Earth-retaining structures. AS 4678-2002. Sydney, Australia: AS.
Baecher, G. B. 1987. Geotechnical risk analysis user’s guide. Rep. No. FHWA/RD-87-011. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Baecher, G. B., and J. T. Christian. 2003. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Bathurst, R. J., T. M. Allen, Y. Miyata, and B. Huang. 2013. “Lessons learned from LRFD calibration of reinforced soil wall structures.” In Modern geotechnical design codes of practises, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 261–276. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Bica, A. V. D., and C. R. I. Clayton. 1989. “Limit equilibrium design methods for free embedded cantilever walls in granular soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 86: 879–898.
Bica, A. V. D., and C. R. I. Clayton. 1992. “Design chart for preliminary estimation of depth of embedment of cantilever sheet-pile walls under dry or fully submerged condition.” In The Preliminary Design of Free Embedded Cantilever Walls in Granular Soil. Proc. Int. Conf. on Retaining Structures, 731–740. Cambridge, UK: Thomas Telford Limited.
Blum, H. 1931. Einspannungsuerhultnisse bei Bohlwerken. Berlin: W. Ernst & Sohn.
Bolton, M. D. 1993. “What are partial factors for?” Proc., Int. Symp. on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering, 565–583. DGF Bulletin 10. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Geotechnical Society.
Bolton, M. D. 1996. “Geotechnical design of retaining walls.” Struct. Eng. 74 (21): 365–369.
Bond, A., and A. Harris. 2008. Decoding Eurocode 7. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
BSI (British Standard Institution). 1994. Code of practice for earth retaining structures. BS8002:1994. London: BSI.
Budhu, M. 2011. Soil mechanics and foundations. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Caquot, A., and J. Kerisel. 1948. Tables for the calculation of passive pressure, active pressure and bearing capacity of foundations. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 7 geotechnical design. part 1: General rules. EN1997:2004. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CGS (Canadian Geotechnical Society). 2006. Canadian foundation engineering manual. Calgary, Canada: CGS.
Chan, C. L., and B. K. Low. 2012. “Practical second-order reliability analysis applied to foundation engineering.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 36 (11): 1387–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1057.
Ching, J., and K. K. Phoon. 2014. “Constructing multivariate distributions for soil parameters.” In Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering, edited by K. K. Phoon and J. Ching, 3–74. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Clayton, C. R. I., R. I. Woods, A. J. Bong, and J. Milititsky. 2014. Earth pressure and earth-retaining structures. 3rd ed. London: CRC Press.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2000. Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDS). Toronto, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN (CSA-S6-14). Mississauga, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6:19. Toronto, ON: CSA Group.
Dithinde, M., and J. V. Retief. 2016. “Semi-probabilistic geotechnical limit state design: Salient features and implementation roadmap for southern Africa.” In Proceedings of the first Southern African Geotechnical Conf., edited by S. W. Jacobsz, 129–134. Sun City, South Africa: Taylor & Francis Group.
Fenton, G. A. 2013. “Geotechnical design code development in Canada.” In Modern geotechnical design codes of practice, edited by P. Arnold, G. A. Fenton, M. A. Hicks, T. Schweckendiek, and B. Simpson, 277–294. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Fenton, G. A., F. Naghibi, D. Dundas, R. J. Bathurst, and D. V. Griffiths. 2016. “Reliability-based geotechnical design in 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.” Can. Geotech. J. 53 (2): 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0158.
Ferreira, S. R. d. M., S. Fucale, J. T. R. de Oliveira, W. B. de Sá, and S. F. d. A. Moura. 2016. “Evaluation of the friction angle of soil-wall in contact with different materials and surface roughness.” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 21 (13): 4655–4672.
Gaba, A., S. Hardy, L. Doughty, W. Powrie, and D. Selemetas. 2017. Guidance on embedded retaining wall design. CIRIA Rep. No. C76O. London: CIRIA.
Gaba, A., B. Simpson, W. Powrie, and D. Breadman. 2003. Embedded retaining walls: Guidance for economical design. CIRIA Rep. No. C580. London: CIRIA.
GCO (Geotechnical Control Office). 1982. Guide to retaining wall design. Geoguide 1. Hong Kong: GCO.
GEO (Geotechnical Engineering Office). 1993. Guide to retaining wall design. Geoguide 1. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
GEO (Geotechnical Engineering Office). 2020. Guide to retaining wall design. Geoguide 1 (e-version). Hong Kong: Civil Engineering and Development Department, HKSAR Government.
Griffiths, D. V., G. A. Fenton, and N. Manoharan. 2002. “Bearing capacity of rough rigid strip footing on cohesive soil: Probabilistic study.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128 (9): 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:9(743).
Hansen, B. J. 1953. “Earth pressure calculation.” Ph.D. thesis, The Institution of Danish Civil Engineers, The Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen.
Hansen, J. B. 1956. Limit design and safety factors in soil mechanics. Bulletin No. 1. Lyngby, Denmark: Danish Geotechnical Institute.
Honjo, Y. 2008. “Monte Carlo simulation in reliability analysis.” In Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering, edited by K. K. Phoon, 169–191. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
ICE (Institute of Civil Engineers). 2012. Vol. 1 of Manual of geotechnical engineering: Geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation. Geotechnical engineering. London: ICE.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2002. Specifications for highway bridges: Part I common. Tokyo: JRA.
Kass, R. E., and A. E. Raftery. 1995. “Bayes factors.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90 (430): 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572.
Knappett, J. A., and R. F. Craig. 2012. Craig’s soil mechanics. 8th ed. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.
Krey, H. 1932. Erddruck, Erdwiderstand und Traqjaliigkeit des Baugrundes. 4th ed. Berlin: W. Ernst & Sohn.
Lacasse, S., and F. Nadim. 1998. “Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, 1172–1192. Missouri, MO: Missouri S&T.
Li, D.-Q., and X.-S. Tang. 2015. “Modeling and simulation of bivariate distribution of shear strength parameters using copulas.” In Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering, edited by K. K. Phoon and J. Ching, 77–126. London: CRC Press.
Low, B. K., and K. K. Phoon. 2015. “Reliability-based design and its complementary role to Eurocode 7 design approach.” Comput. Geotech. 65: 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.11.011.
Masih, R. 1984. “Graphical solution for sheet pile embedment.” J. Geotech. Eng. 110 (4): 534–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:4(534).
Murthy, V. N. S. 2002. Geotechnical engineering: Principles and practices of soil mechanics and foundation engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Orr, T. L. L., U. Bergdahl, R. Frank, G. Scarpelli, and B. Simpson. 2005. “Evaluation of Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on the Evaluation of Eurocode 7, edited by T. L. L. Orr.
Palisade Corporation. 2019. @Risk v7.6.1. New York. https://www.palisade.com/.
Phoon, K. K. 2016. “Role of reliability calculations in geotechnical design.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 11 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2016.1265653.
Phoon, K. K. 2020. “The story of statistics in geotechnical engineering.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 14 (1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1700423.
Phoon, K. K., and J. Ching. 2016. “Semi-probabilistic reliability-based design.” In Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394 in ISO2394, edited by K. K. Phoon and J. V. Retief, 160–192. London: CRC Press.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
Phoon, K. K., S. L. Liu, and Y. K. Chow. 2003. “Estimation of model uncertainties for reliability-based design of cantilever walls in sand.” In Limit state design in geotechnical engineering practice - The international workshop LSD2003, edited by K. K. Phoon, Y. Honjo, and R. G. Gilbert, 1–17. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Phoon, K. K., S. Liu, and Y. K. Chow. 2009. “Characterization of model uncertainties for cantilever retaining walls in sand.” J. Geoeng. 4 (3): 75–85. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2009.4(3).1.
Powrie, W. 1996. “Limit equilibrium analysis of embedded retaining walls.” Géotechnique 46 (4): 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.709.
Rosenblueth, E. 1975. “Point estimates for probability moments.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72 (10): 3812–3814. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.10.3812.
Rowe, P. W. 1951. “Cantilever sheet piling in cohesionless soil.” Engineering 172: 316–319.
SABS (South African Bureau of Standards). 2011. Basis of geotechnical design and actions for buindings and industrial structures. SANS 10160. South Africa: SABS Standard Division.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat. 6 (2): 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.
Simpson, B. 2007. “Approaches to ULS design – The merits of Design Approach 1 in Eurocode 7.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety & Risk, edited by H. Hongwei, and L. Zhang, 527–538. Shanghai: Tongji Univ.
Simpson, B., and W. Powrie. 2001. “Embedded retaining walls: Theory, practice and understanding.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2505–2524. Istanbul, Turkey: Taylor & Francis Group.
Teng, W. C. 1962. Foundation design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
USACE. 1994. Design of sheet pile walls. Engineer Manual No. 1110-2-2504. Washington, DC: Dept. of Army.
USACE. 1997. Engineering and design: Introduction to probability and reliability methods for Use in geotechnical engineering. Engineer Technical Letter No. 1110-2-547. Washington, DC: Dept. of Army.
U.S. Department of Navy. 1986. Foundations and earth structures. Design Manual 7.02. Washington, DC: Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC).
US Steel International. 1975. USS Steel sheet piling design manual. Pittsburg, PA: US Steel.
Viviescas, J. C., Á. J. Mattos, and J. P. Osorio. 2020. “Uncertainty quantification in the bearing capacity estimation for shallow foundations in sandy soils.” Georisk 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1753782.
Viviescas, J. C., J. P. Osorio, and J. E. Cañon. 2017. “Reliability-based designs procedure of earth retaining walls in geotechnical engineering.” Obras y Proyectos 22: 50–60. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-28132017000200050.
Wang, Y. 2013. “MCS-based probabilistic design of embedded sheet pile walls.” Georisk: Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 7 (3): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.765286.
Wang, Y., T. Schweckendiek, W. Gong, T. Zhao, and K.-K. Phoon. 2016. “Direct probability-based design methods.” In Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394, edited by K. K. Phoon and J. V. Retief, 194–226. London: CRC Press.
Zhang, L., J. Li, X. Li, J. Zhang, and H. Zhu. 2016. Rainfall-induced soil slope failure: Stability analysis and probabilistic assessment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 21Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Aug 31, 2020
Accepted: Dec 11, 2020
Published online: Mar 12, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

GeoResearch International – GeoR, Escuela Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-3288. Email: [email protected]
GeoResearch International – GeoR, Escuela Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia. IDD Integrated Digital Design – Conconcreto, IDD-us.com. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-335X.
School of Civil and Structural Engineering, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Bolton St., Dublin 1 D01 K822, Ireland; GeoResearch International – GeoR, Escuela Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9230-6872.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share