Technical Papers
Apr 17, 2020

Numerical Assessment of Factors Influencing the Tensile Strength of Rocks via Pull-Off Test

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 7

Abstract

The pull-off test (POT) is a tensile strength testing method that is widely used in concrete/mortar and was recently applied to rock mechanics. The POT can be easily performed in both the field and the laboratory. This study uses the extended finite-element method to analyze the POT fracture mechanism under different test conditions and to assess the factors influencing the tensile strength of homogeneous rock. The numerical results were validated with experimental data, and a good agreement was obtained. An ideal test geometry was proposed (the depth and the width of the partial core were 2.5 and 0.4 cm, respectively). The POT can overestimate or underestimate the tensile strength of the rock, depending on the cohesive fracture energy, and a correction equation was proposed for visually homogeneous rocks and concrete.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the following entities: the São Paulo Research Support Foundation (FAPESP) corresponding to process 2017/03273-9, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

References

ASTM. 1995. Standard test method for direct tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM D2936-95. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test method for tensile strength of concrete surfaces and the bond strength or tensile strength of concrete repair and overlay materials by direct tension (pull-off method). ASTM C1583-04. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Austin, S., P. Robins, and Y. Pan. 1995. “Tensile bond testing of concrete repairs.” Mater. Struct. 28 (5): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473259.
Barenblatt, G. I. 1959. “The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks.” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 23 (3): 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1.
Barenblatt, G. I. 1962. “The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture.” Adv. Appl. Mech. 7 (1): 55–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2.
Belytschko, T., and T. Black. 1999. “Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45 (5): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5%3C601::AID-NME598%3E3.0.CO;2-S.
Bungey, J. H., and R. Madandoust. 1992. “Factor influencing pull-off tests on concrete.” Mag. Concr. Res. 44 (158): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1992.44.158.21.
Cacciari, P. P., and M. M. Futai. 2018. “Assessing the tensile strength of rocks and geological discontinuities via pull-off tests.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 105 (380): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.011.
Chong, K. P., and M. D. Kuruppu. 1984. “New specimen for fracture toughness determination for rock and other materials.” Int. J. Fract. 26 (2): 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01157555.
Courard, L., B. Bissonnette, A. Garbacz, A. Vaysburd, K. Von Fay, G. Moczulski, and M. Morency. 2014. “Effect of misalignment on pull-off test results: Numerical and experimental assessments.” ACI Mater. J. 111 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686451.
Dassault Systèmes. 2012. Analysis user’s manual. Johnston, RI: Dassault Systèmes.
Deb, D., and Y. K. Gujjala. 2018. “Extended finite element procedures for analysis of bolt crossing multiple intersecting rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 107: 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.052.
Diederichs, M. S., and P. K. Kaiser. 1999. “Tensile strength and abutment relaxation as failure control mechanisms in underground excavations.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 36 (1): 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00179-X.
Dugdale, D. S. 1960. “Yielding of steel sheets containing clits.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8 (2): 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2.
Elices, M., G. V. Guinea, J. Gómez, and J. Planas. 2002. “The cohesive zone model: Advantages, limitations and challenges.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 69 (2): 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2.
Ferestade, I., P. Hosseini Tehrani, and R. Heidary. 2017. “Fracture toughness estimation of ballast stone used in Iranian railway.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 9 (5): 892–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.017.
Fu, J., J. Xie, S. Wang, J. Yang, F. Yang, and H. Pu. 2019. “Cracking performance of an operational tunnel lining due to local construction defects.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (4): 04019019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001371.
Griffith, A. A. 1920. “The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 221 (582–593): 163–198.
Hibbeler, R. 2012. Engineering mechanics statics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hobbs, D. W. 1964. “The tensile strength of rocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 1 (3): 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(64)90005-1.
Huntsman. 2004. Araldite AV 138 Endurecedor HV 998. São Paulo, Brazil: Huntsman Advanced Materials Química Brasil.
Kuruppu, M. D., Y. Obara, M. R. Ayatollahi, K. P. Chong, and T. Funatsu. 2014. “ISRM-suggested method for determining the mode I static fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (1): 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0422-7.
Melenk, J. M., and I. Babuška. 1996. “The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 139 (1–4): 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0.
Moës, N., J. Dolbow, and T. Belytschko. 1999. “A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 46 (1): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1%3C131::AID-NME726%3E3.0.CO;2-J.
Peerlings, R., W. Brekelmans, R. de Borst, and M. Geers. 2001. “Mathematical and numerical aspects of an elasticity-based local approach to fracture.” Revue Eur. des Elem. Finis 10 (2–4): 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/12506559.2001.11869248.
Perras, M. A., and M. S. Diederichs. 2014. “A review of the tensile strength of rock: Concepts and testing.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 32 (2): 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9732-0.
Rabczuk, T., G. Zi, A. Gerstenberger, and W. A. Wall. 2008. “A new crack tip element for the phantom-node method with arbitrary cohesive cracks.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 75 (5): 577–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2273.
Schultz, R. A. 1995. “Limits on strength and deformation properties of jointed basaltic rock masses.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 28 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024770.
Shah, S., S. E. Swartz, and C. Ouyang. 1995. Fracture mechanics of concrete: Applications of fracture mechanics to concrete, rock and other quasi-brittle materials. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Wang, X., P. Yu, J. Yu, Y. Yu, and H. Lv. 2018. “Simulated crack and slip plane propagation in soil slopes with embedded discontinuities using XFEM.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (12): 04018170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001290.
Weng, M.-C., J.-H. Li, C.-H. Lin, and C.-T. Liao. 2018. “Measuring foliation tensile strength of metamorphic rock by using pull-off test.” Geotech. Test. J. 41 (1): 132–140.
Whittaker, B. N., R. N. Singh, and G. Sun. 1992. Rock fracture mechanics—Principles, design and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wu, L. Z., G. Q. Shao, R. Q. Huang, and Q. He. 2018. “Overhanging rock: Theoretical, physical and numerical modeling.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51 (11): 3585–3597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1543-9.
Xie, Y., P. Cao, J. Jin, and M. Wang. 2017. “Mixed mode fracture analysis of semi-circular bend (SCB) specimen: A numerical study based on extended finite element method.” Comput. Geotech. 82: 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.012.
Xu, X., S. Wu, A. Jin, and Y. Gao. 2018. “Review of the relationships between crack initiation stress, mode I fracture toughness and tensile strength of geo-materials.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (10): 04018136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001227.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: May 6, 2019
Accepted: Dec 19, 2019
Published online: Apr 17, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.E. Student, Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Polytechnic School, Univ. of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0159-8847. Email: [email protected]
Pedro Pazzoto Cacciari, D.Sc. [email protected]
Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Polytechnic School, Univ. of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil. Email: [email protected]
Marcos Massao Futai [email protected]
Professor, Civil Engineering Graduate Program, Polytechnic School, Univ. of São Paulo, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share