Technical Papers
Jan 29, 2020

Choosing Appropriate Appraisal to Describe Peak-Spatial Features of Rock-Joint Profiles

Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20, Issue 4

Abstract

Understanding the contact behaviors of rock joint is of fundamental importance in many rock engineering practices. Most of the available contact models rely on the spatial features of asperity peaks as input parameters, such as peak density, radius, and height. However, there is no general accepted appraisal to characterize the spatial features of peaks distributed on the rough surfaces. The present study clarified how different peak identification criteria, accounting for the number of required neighboring points (three, five, and seven points), affects the peak spatial features for a rock joint profile [two-dimensional (2D)]. The three-point peak (3PP) criterion appears to be the most appropriate appraisal to identify the peaks for rock joint profiles, and was suggested to capture the peak spatial features. Further discussion of the effects of both sampling interval in the x-direction and preselected peak-threshold value in the z-direction on the peak spatial features of joint profile were provided on the basis of the 3PP criterion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Natural Science Foundation of China under Projects 41672302, 41402247, and 41731284, and from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), under Project CUGGC09.

References

Barber, J. R. 2013. “Multiscale surfaces and Amontons’ law of friction.” Tribol. Lett. 49 (3): 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0094-6.
Barton, N., and V. Choubey. 1977. “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 10 (1): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261801.
Belem, T., M. Souley, and F. Homand. 2007. “Modeling surface roughness degradation of rock joint wall during monotonic and cyclic shearing.” Acta Geotech. 2 (4): 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-007-0039-7.
Benoit, N., E. Andreas, P. Christophe, and S. Aline. 2017. “Multiscale characterization of joint surface roughness.” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 122 (12): 9714–9728. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014322.
Bhushan, B., and P. L. Ko. 2002. Introduction to tribology. New York: Wiley.
Brown, S. R., and C. H. Scholz. 1985. “Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact.” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 90 (B7): 5531–5545. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05531.
Brown, S. R., and C. H. Scholz. 1986. “Closure of rock joints.” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 91 (B5): 4939–4948. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB05p04939.
Chen, N., X. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Feng, W. Wei, and B. Yi. 2018. “Shear behavior of rough rock joints reinforced by bolts.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (1): 04017130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001048.
Cook, N. G. W. 1992. “Natural joints in rock: Mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 29 (3): 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(92)93656-5.
Ge, Y., H. Tang, M. A. M. E. Eldin, L. Wang, Q. Wu, and C. Xiong. 2017. “Evolution process of natural rock joint roughness during direct shear tests.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (5): E4016013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000694.
Grasselli, G., J. Wirth, and P. Egger. 2002. “Quantitative three-dimensional description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 (6): 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00070-9.
Greenwood, J. A. 1984. “A unified theory of surface roughness.” Proc. R. Soc. London 393 (1804): 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1984.0050.
Greenwood, J. A., and J. H. Tripp. 1967. “The elastic contact of rough spheres.” J. Appl. Mech. 34 (1): 153. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3607616.
Greenwood, J. A., and J. H. Tripp. 1971. “The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 185 (1): 625–633. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1970_185_069_02.
Greenwood, J. A., and J. B. P. Williamson. 1966. “Contact of nominally flat surfaces.” Proc. R. Soc. London 295 (1442): 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.0242.
Hopkins, D. L. 2000. “The implications of joint deformation in analyzing the properties and behavior of fractured rock masses, underground excavations, and faults.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37 (1): 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00100-8.
International Society for Rock Mechanics. 1978. “Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 15 (6): 319–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)91472-9.
Johansson, F. 2016. “Influence of scale and matedness on the peak shear strength of fresh, unweathered rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 82 (Feb): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.11.010.
Li, Y., W. Wu, and B. Li. 2018. “An analytical model for two-order asperity degradation of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51 (5): 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1405-5.
Marache, A., J. Riss, and S. Gentier. 2008. “Experimental and modelled mechanical behaviour of a rock fracture under normal stress.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 41 (6): 869–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-008-0166-y.
McCool, J. I. 1987. “Relating profile instrument measurements to the functional performance of rough surfaces.” J. Tribol. 109 (2): 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3261349.
Meng, F., L. N. Y. Wong, H. Zhou, and Z. Wang. 2018. “Comparative study on dynamic shear behavior and failure mechanism of two types of granite joint.” Eng. Geol. 245 (Nov): 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.005.
Misra, A. 1999. “Micromechanical model for anisotropic rock joints.” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 104 (B10): 23175–23187. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900210.
Misra, A., and O. Marangos. 2011a. “Effect of loading induced anisotropy on the shear behavior of rough interfaces.” Tribol. Int. 44 (5): 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.12.010.
Misra, A., and O. Marangos. 2011b. “Rock-joint micromechanics: Relationship of roughness to closure and wave propagation.” Int. J. Geomech. 11 (6): 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000021.
Nayak, P. R. 1971. “Random process model of rough surfaces.” J. Tribol. 93 (3): 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3451608.
Poon, C. Y., and B. Bhushan. 1995. “Surface roughness analysis of glass-ceramic substrates and finished magnetic disks, and Ni-P coated Al-Mg and glass substrates.” Wear 190 (1): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06764-7.
Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., and J. P. Morris. 2000. “Single fractures under normal stress: The relation between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37 (1): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00104-5.
Reeves, M. J. 1985. “Rock surface roughness and frictional strength.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 22 (6): 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)90007-5.
Sista, B., and K. Vemaganti. 2014. “Estimation of statistical parameters of rough surfaces suitable for developing micro-asperity friction models.” Wear 316 (1–2): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.04.012.
Song, H., A. I. Vakis, X. Liu, and E. Van der Giessen. 2017. “Statistical model of rough surface contact accounting for size-dependent plasticity and asperity interaction.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 106 (Sep): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.05.014.
Swan, G. 1983. “Determination of stiffness and other joint properties from roughness measurements.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 16 (1): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01030216.
Swan, G., and S. Zongqi. 1985. “Prediction of shear behaviour of joints using profiles.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 18 (3): 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112506.
Tang, Z. C. 2013. “Mechanical behaviors of rock joint under different contact state and columnar jointed rock mass.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Tang, Z. C., Y. Y. Jiao, and L. N. Y. Wong. 2017. “Theoretical model with multi-asperity interaction for the closure behavior of rock joint.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 97 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.06.003.
Tang, Z. C., Q. S. Liu, C. C. Xia, Y. L. Song, J. H. Huang, and C. B. Wang. 2014. “Mechanical model for predicting closure behavior of rock joints under normal stress.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (6): 2287–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0499-z.
Tang, Z. C., and L. N. Y. Wong. 2016. “New criterion for evaluating the peak shear strength of rock joints under different contact states.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (4): 1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0811-1.
Tatone, B. S. A., and G. Grasselli. 2010. “A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47 (8): 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.006.
Tatone, B. S. A., and G. Grasselli. 2013. “An investigation of discontinuity roughness scale dependency using high-resolution surface measurements.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 46 (4): 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0294-2.
Tomanik, E. 2005. Modelling of the asperity contact are on actual 3D surfaces. Troy, MI: SAE International.
Whitehouse, D. J., and J. Archard. 1970. “The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact.” Proc. R. Soc. London Math. Phys. Sci. 316 (1524): 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1970.0068.
Xia, C. C., Z. C. Tang, W. M. Xiao, and Y. L. Song. 2014. “New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47 (2): 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0395-6.
Xia, C. C., Z. Q. Yue, L. G. Tham, C. F. Lee, and Z. Q. Sun. 2003. “Quantifying topography and closure deformation of rock joints.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40 (2): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00134-X.
Zavarise, G., M. Borri-Brunetto, and M. Paggi. 2004. “On the reliability of microscopical contact models.” Wear 257 (3): 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2003.12.010.
Zhao, J. 1997. “Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 (2): 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00063-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to International Journal of Geomechanics
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 20Issue 4April 2020

History

Received: Oct 11, 2018
Accepted: Sep 20, 2019
Published online: Jan 29, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 29, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhicheng Tang [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China. Email: [email protected]
Yuyong Jiao [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, PR China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share